From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: 2.5.59-mm2 From: Arjan van de Ven Reply-To: arjanv@redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20030118002027.2be733c7.akpm@digeo.com> References: <20030118002027.2be733c7.akpm@digeo.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-WHsfDqNlNROI9SmuFvTv" Message-Id: <1042920761.15782.5.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: 18 Jan 2003 21:12:41 +0100 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, nitin.a.kamble@intel.com, jun.nakajima@intel.com, asit.k.mallick@intel.com, sunil.saxena@intel.com List-ID: --=-WHsfDqNlNROI9SmuFvTv Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > +kirq-up-fix.patch >=20 > Fix the kirq build for non-SMP Hi, Is there any reason to put this complexity in the kernel instead of doing it from a userspace daemon? A userspace daemon can do higher level evaluations, read config files about the system (like numa configuration etc etc) and all 2.4/2.5 kernels already have a userspace api for setting irq affinity.. an example of a simple version of such daemon is: http://people.redhat.com/arjanv/irqbalance/irqbalance-0.03.tar.gz any chance of testing this in an intel lab? Greetings, Arjan van de Ven --=-WHsfDqNlNROI9SmuFvTv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+KbU5xULwo51rQBIRAs3yAJsEcLzbrvTdU6NbEd4c8NHjdiDKZQCfQ3QE smDeLZLj8ZsZi7H6b6y1cFU= =l28J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-WHsfDqNlNROI9SmuFvTv-- -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/