From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [rfc][patch] Memory Binding API v0.3 2.5.41 From: john stultz In-Reply-To: <3DAB6385.9000207@us.ibm.com> References: <3DAB5DF2.5000002@us.ibm.com> <2004595005.1034616026@[10.10.2.3]> <3DAB6385.9000207@us.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: 14 Oct 2002 17:55:53 -0700 Message-Id: <1034643354.19094.149.camel@cog> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Matt Cc: "Martin J. Bligh" , "Eric W. Biederman" , linux-kernel , linux-mm@kvack.org, LSE Tech , Andrew Morton , Michael Hohnbaum List-ID: On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 17:38, Matthew Dobson wrote: > Also, right now, memblks map to nodes in a straightforward manner (1-1 > on NUMA-Q, the only architecture that has defined them). It will likely > look the same on most architectures, too. Just an FYI: I believe the x440 breaks this assumption. There are 2 chunks on the first CEC. The current discontig patch for it has to drop the second chunk (anything over 3.5G on the first CEC) in order to work w/ the existing code. However, that will probably need to be addressed at some point, so be aware that this might affect you as well. thanks -john -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/