From: Steven Cole <elenstev@mesatop.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>
Cc: "Martin J. Bligh" <Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: MM patches against 2.5.31
Date: 25 Aug 2002 21:06:20 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1030331182.16525.16.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D699343.D5343AD4@zip.com.au>
On Sun, 2002-08-25 at 20:32, Andrew Morton wrote:
> "Martin J. Bligh" wrote:
> >
> > >> > kjournald: page allocation failure. order:0, mode:0x0
> > >>
> > >> I've seen this before, but am curious how we ever passed
> > >> a gfpmask (aka mode) of 0 to __alloc_pages? Can't see anywhere
> > >> that does this?
> > >
> > > Could be anywhere, really. A network interrupt doing GFP_ATOMIC
> > > while kjournald is executing. A radix-tree node allocation
> > > on the add-to-swap path perhaps. (The swapout failure messages
> > > aren't supposed to come out, but mempool_alloc() stomps on the
> > > caller's setting of PF_NOWARN.)
> > >
> > > Or:
> > >
> > > mnm:/usr/src/25> grep -r GFP_ATOMIC drivers/scsi/*.c | wc -l
> > > 89
> >
> > No, GFP_ATOMIC is not 0:
> >
>
> It's mempool_alloc(GFP_NOIO) or such. mempool_alloc() strips
> __GFP_WAIT|__GFP_IO on the first attempt.
>
> It also disables the printk, so maybe I just dunno ;) show_stack()
> would tell.
>
The "kjournald: page allocation failure. order:0, mode:0x0" message and
"pdflush: page allocation failure. order:0, mode:0x0" occurred only once
each on my dual p3 scsi ext3 test box running 2.5.31-mm1. So, I added
something like this:
--- page_alloc.c.orig Thu Aug 22 17:27:32 2002
+++ page_alloc.c Thu Aug 22 17:29:24 2002
@@ -388,6 +388,8 @@
printk("%s: page allocation failure."
" order:%d, mode:0x%x\n",
current->comm, order, gfp_mask);
+ if (gfp_mask == 0)
+ BUG();
}
return NULL;
}
and continued testing on Friday with no repeats of the "page allocation failure"
messages. I obtained a second dual p3 ext3 test box (ide this time) and left both
boxes running 2.5.31-mm1 and the dbench 1..128 stress test scripted to rerun many
times over the weekend. Due to a couple of firewalls, I can't look at those boxes
from here, but I'll let you know what happened in about 10 to 11 hours.
Cheers,
Steven
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-26 3:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-22 2:29 Andrew Morton
2002-08-22 11:28 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2002-08-26 1:52 ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-26 9:10 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2002-08-26 14:22 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-26 15:29 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2002-08-26 17:56 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-26 19:24 ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-26 19:34 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-26 19:48 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2002-08-27 9:22 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2002-08-27 19:19 ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-26 20:00 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2002-08-26 20:09 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-26 20:58 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2002-08-27 16:48 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-28 13:14 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2002-08-28 17:18 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-28 17:42 ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-28 20:41 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-28 21:03 ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-28 22:04 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-28 22:39 ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-28 22:57 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-08-26 21:31 ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-27 3:42 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-08-27 4:37 ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-22 15:59 ` Steven Cole
2002-08-22 16:06 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-08-22 19:45 ` Steven Cole
2002-08-26 2:15 ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-26 2:08 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-08-26 2:32 ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-26 3:06 ` Steven Cole [this message]
2002-08-26 22:09 Ed Tomlinson
2002-08-26 23:58 ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-27 0:13 ` Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1030331182.16525.16.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=elenstev@mesatop.com \
--cc=Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox