From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: MM patches against 2.5.31 From: Steven Cole In-Reply-To: <3D644C70.6D100EA5@zip.com.au> References: <3D644C70.6D100EA5@zip.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: 22 Aug 2002 09:59:17 -0600 Message-Id: <1030031958.14756.479.camel@spc9.esa.lanl.gov> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Andrew Morton Cc: lkml , "linux-mm@kvack.org" List-ID: On Wed, 2002-08-21 at 20:29, Andrew Morton wrote: > I've uploaded a rollup of pending fixes and feature work > against 2.5.31 to > > http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/2.5/2.5.31/2.5.31-mm1/ > > The rolled up patch there is suitable for ongoing testing and > development. The individual patches are in the broken-out/ > directory and should all be documented. The good news: I ran my dbench 1..128 stress test and for the first time since 2.5.31-vanilla there were _no_ BUG()s reported at all. The other news: from dmesg: kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds EXT3 FS 2.4-0.9.16, 02 Dec 2001 on sd(8,3), internal journal EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. kjournald: page allocation failure. order:0, mode:0x0 The kjournald failure message came out with dbench 48 running on an ext3 partition. The test continued with only this one instance of this message. Steven -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/