From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: [PATCH] strict VM overcommit for stock 2.4 From: Robert Love In-Reply-To: <1027022323.8154.38.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> References: <1027022323.8154.38.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: 18 Jul 2002 11:52:19 -0700 Message-Id: <1027018340.1086.134.camel@sinai> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Alan Cox Cc: Szakacsits Szabolcs , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2002-07-18 at 12:58, Alan Cox wrote: > Adjusting the percentages to have a root only zone is doable. It helps > in some conceivable cases but not all. Do people think its important, if > so I'll add it Changing the rules would be easy, but you would need to make the accounting check for root vs non-root and keep track accordingly. Admittedly not hard but not entirely pretty either. I still contend the issues are not related. It would make more sense to me to do resource limits to solve this problem - rlimits are something Rik has on his TODO and supposedly easy to add to rmap. That way people can use strict overcommit, rlimits, neither, or both to meet their needs. Robert Love -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/