linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@amd.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Mel Gorman" <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>, <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Bharata B Rao <bharata@amd.com>,
	Aithal Srikanth <sraithal@amd.com>,
	"kernel test robot" <oliver.sang@intel.com>,
	Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@amd.com>,
	Sapkal Swapnil <Swapnil.Sapkal@amd.com>,
	K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH V1 6/6] sched/numa: Allow scanning of shared VMAs
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 11:36:14 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0ff0d56b88a64e2017b427f37b15ab41aa5d4019.1693287931.git.raghavendra.kt@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1693287931.git.raghavendra.kt@amd.com>

VMAs being accessed by more than two tasks are critical. Scan them
unconditionally. Note that current patch considers full history of
VMA access.

Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@amd.com>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 6529da7f370a..70c8e62c1a89 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -2981,6 +2981,19 @@ static inline bool vma_accessed_recent(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
 	return (bitmap_weight(pids, BITS_PER_LONG) >= 1);
 }
 
+#define SHARED_VMA_THRESH	3
+
+static inline bool vma_shared_access(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+{
+	int i;
+	unsigned long pids = 0;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < NR_ACCESS_PID_HIST; i++)
+		pids  |= vma->numab_state->access_pids[i];
+
+	return (bitmap_weight(&pids, BITS_PER_LONG) >= SHARED_VMA_THRESH);
+}
+
 static bool vma_is_accessed(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
 {
 	/* Check at least one task had accessed VMA recently. */
@@ -2991,7 +3004,8 @@ static bool vma_is_accessed(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
 	if (vma_test_access_pid_history(vma))
 		return true;
 
-	return false;
+	/* Check if VMA is shared by many tasks. */
+	return vma_shared_access(vma);
 }
 
 #define VMA_PID_RESET_PERIOD (4 * sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_delay)
-- 
2.34.1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-08-29  6:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-29  6:06 [RFC PATCH V1 0/6] sched/numa: Enhance disjoint VMA scanning Raghavendra K T
2023-08-29  6:06 ` [RFC PATCH V1 1/6] sched/numa: Move up the access pid reset logic Raghavendra K T
2023-08-29  6:06 ` [RFC PATCH V1 2/6] sched/numa: Add disjoint vma unconditional scan logic Raghavendra K T
2023-09-12  7:50   ` kernelt test robot
2023-09-13  6:21     ` Raghavendra K T
2023-08-29  6:06 ` [RFC PATCH V1 3/6] sched/numa: Remove unconditional scan logic using mm numa_scan_seq Raghavendra K T
2023-08-29  6:06 ` [RFC PATCH V1 4/6] sched/numa: Increase tasks' access history Raghavendra K T
2023-09-12 14:24   ` kernel test robot
2023-09-13  6:15     ` Raghavendra K T
2023-09-13  7:34       ` Oliver Sang
2023-08-29  6:06 ` [RFC PATCH V1 5/6] sched/numa: Allow recently accessed VMAs to be scanned Raghavendra K T
2023-09-10 15:29   ` kernel test robot
2023-09-11 11:25     ` Raghavendra K T
2023-09-12  2:22       ` Oliver Sang
2023-09-12  6:43         ` Raghavendra K T
2023-08-29  6:06 ` Raghavendra K T [this message]
2023-09-13  5:28 ` [RFC PATCH V1 0/6] sched/numa: Enhance disjoint VMA scanning Swapnil Sapkal
2023-09-13  6:24   ` Raghavendra K T
2023-09-19  6:30 ` Raghavendra K T
2023-09-19  7:15   ` Ingo Molnar
2023-09-19  8:06     ` Raghavendra K T
2023-09-19  9:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-19 16:22   ` Mel Gorman
2023-09-19 19:11     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-09-20 10:42     ` Raghavendra K T

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0ff0d56b88a64e2017b427f37b15ab41aa5d4019.1693287931.git.raghavendra.kt@amd.com \
    --to=raghavendra.kt@amd.com \
    --cc=Swapnil.Sapkal@amd.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bharata@amd.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sraithal@amd.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox