From: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, tkhai@ya.ru, vbabka@suse.cz,
roman.gushchin@linux.dev, djwong@kernel.org, brauner@kernel.org,
paulmck@kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, steven.price@arm.com,
cel@kernel.org, senozhatsky@chromium.org, yujie.liu@intel.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, muchun.song@linux.dev,
simon.horman@corigine.com, dlemoal@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, cluster-devel@redhat.com,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
rcu@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 45/48] mm: shrinker: make global slab shrink lockless
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2023 15:22:51 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0fdb926c-0d61-d81f-1a52-4ef634b51804@bytedance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZNGnSbiPN0lDLpSW@dread.disaster.area>
Hi Dave,
On 2023/8/8 10:24, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 07:09:33PM +0800, Qi Zheng wrote:
>> diff --git a/include/linux/shrinker.h b/include/linux/shrinker.h
>> index eb342994675a..f06225f18531 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/shrinker.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/shrinker.h
>> @@ -4,6 +4,8 @@
>>
>> #include <linux/atomic.h>
>> #include <linux/types.h>
>> +#include <linux/refcount.h>
>> +#include <linux/completion.h>
>>
>> #define SHRINKER_UNIT_BITS BITS_PER_LONG
>>
>> @@ -87,6 +89,10 @@ struct shrinker {
>> int seeks; /* seeks to recreate an obj */
>> unsigned flags;
>>
>> + refcount_t refcount;
>> + struct completion done;
>> + struct rcu_head rcu;
>
> Documentation, please. What does the refcount protect, what does the
> completion provide, etc.
How about the following:
/*
* reference count of this shrinker, holding this can guarantee
* that the shrinker will not be released.
*/
refcount_t refcount;
/*
* Wait for shrinker::refcount to reach 0, that is, no shrinker
* is running or will run again.
*/
struct completion done;
>
>> +
>> void *private_data;
>>
>> /* These are for internal use */
>> @@ -120,6 +126,17 @@ struct shrinker *shrinker_alloc(unsigned int flags, const char *fmt, ...);
>> void shrinker_register(struct shrinker *shrinker);
>> void shrinker_free(struct shrinker *shrinker);
>>
>> +static inline bool shrinker_try_get(struct shrinker *shrinker)
>> +{
>> + return refcount_inc_not_zero(&shrinker->refcount);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void shrinker_put(struct shrinker *shrinker)
>> +{
>> + if (refcount_dec_and_test(&shrinker->refcount))
>> + complete(&shrinker->done);
>> +}
>> +
>> #ifdef CONFIG_SHRINKER_DEBUG
>> extern int __printf(2, 3) shrinker_debugfs_rename(struct shrinker *shrinker,
>> const char *fmt, ...);
>> diff --git a/mm/shrinker.c b/mm/shrinker.c
>> index 1911c06b8af5..d318f5621862 100644
>> --- a/mm/shrinker.c
>> +++ b/mm/shrinker.c
>> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
>> #include <linux/memcontrol.h>
>> #include <linux/rwsem.h>
>> #include <linux/shrinker.h>
>> +#include <linux/rculist.h>
>> #include <trace/events/vmscan.h>
>>
>> #include "internal.h"
>> @@ -577,33 +578,42 @@ unsigned long shrink_slab(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>> if (!mem_cgroup_disabled() && !mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg))
>> return shrink_slab_memcg(gfp_mask, nid, memcg, priority);
>>
>> - if (!down_read_trylock(&shrinker_rwsem))
>> - goto out;
>> -
>> - list_for_each_entry(shrinker, &shrinker_list, list) {
>> + rcu_read_lock();
>> + list_for_each_entry_rcu(shrinker, &shrinker_list, list) {
>> struct shrink_control sc = {
>> .gfp_mask = gfp_mask,
>> .nid = nid,
>> .memcg = memcg,
>> };
>>
>> + if (!shrinker_try_get(shrinker))
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * We can safely unlock the RCU lock here since we already
>> + * hold the refcount of the shrinker.
>> + */
>> + rcu_read_unlock();
>> +
>> ret = do_shrink_slab(&sc, shrinker, priority);
>> if (ret == SHRINK_EMPTY)
>> ret = 0;
>> freed += ret;
>> +
>> /*
>> - * Bail out if someone want to register a new shrinker to
>> - * prevent the registration from being stalled for long periods
>> - * by parallel ongoing shrinking.
>> + * This shrinker may be deleted from shrinker_list and freed
>> + * after the shrinker_put() below, but this shrinker is still
>> + * used for the next traversal. So it is necessary to hold the
>> + * RCU lock first to prevent this shrinker from being freed,
>> + * which also ensures that the next shrinker that is traversed
>> + * will not be freed (even if it is deleted from shrinker_list
>> + * at the same time).
>> */
>
> This needs to be moved to the head of the function, and document
> the whole list walk, get, put and completion parts of the algorithm
> that make it safe. There's more to this than "we hold a reference
> count", especially the tricky "we might see the shrinker before it
> is fully initialised" case....
How about moving these documents to before list_for_each_entry_rcu(),
and then go to the head of shrink_slab_memcg() to explain the memcg
slab shrink case.
>
>
> .....
>> void shrinker_free(struct shrinker *shrinker)
>> {
>> struct dentry *debugfs_entry = NULL;
>> @@ -686,9 +712,18 @@ void shrinker_free(struct shrinker *shrinker)
>> if (!shrinker)
>> return;
>>
>> + if (shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_REGISTERED) {
>> + shrinker_put(shrinker);
>> + wait_for_completion(&shrinker->done);
>> + }
>
> Needs a comment explaining why we need to wait here...
/*
* Wait for all lookups of the shrinker to complete, after that, no
* shrinker is running or will run again, then we can safely free
* the structure where the shrinker is located, such as super_block
* etc.
*/
>> +
>> down_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
>> if (shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_REGISTERED) {
>> - list_del(&shrinker->list);
>> + /*
>> + * Lookups on the shrinker are over and will fail in the future,
>> + * so we can now remove it from the lists and free it.
>> + */
>
> .... rather than here after the wait has been done and provided the
> guarantee that no shrinker is running or will run again...
With the above comment, how about simplifying the comment here to the
following:
/*
* Now we can safely remove it from the shrinker_list and free it.
*/
Thanks,
Qi
>
> -Dave.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-08 7:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-07 11:08 [PATCH v4 00/48] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
2023-08-07 11:08 ` [PATCH v4 01/48] mm: move some shrinker-related function declarations to mm/internal.h Qi Zheng
2023-08-15 8:36 ` Muchun Song
2023-08-15 9:14 ` Qi Zheng
2023-08-07 11:08 ` [PATCH v4 02/48] mm: vmscan: move shrinker-related code into a separate file Qi Zheng
2023-08-15 8:44 ` Muchun Song
2023-08-07 11:08 ` [PATCH v4 03/48] mm: shrinker: remove redundant shrinker_rwsem in debugfs operations Qi Zheng
2023-08-07 11:08 ` [PATCH v4 04/48] mm: shrinker: add infrastructure for dynamically allocating shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-07 11:08 ` [PATCH v4 05/48] kvm: mmu: dynamically allocate the x86-mmu shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-07 11:08 ` [PATCH v4 06/48] binder: dynamically allocate the android-binder shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-08 2:30 ` Muchun Song
2023-08-07 11:08 ` [PATCH v4 07/48] drm/ttm: dynamically allocate the drm-ttm_pool shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-07 11:08 ` [PATCH v4 08/48] xenbus/backend: dynamically allocate the xen-backend shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-07 11:08 ` [PATCH v4 09/48] erofs: dynamically allocate the erofs-shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-07 11:08 ` [PATCH v4 10/48] f2fs: dynamically allocate the f2fs-shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-07 11:08 ` [PATCH v4 11/48] gfs2: dynamically allocate the gfs2-glock shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v4 12/48] gfs2: dynamically allocate the gfs2-qd shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-15 8:56 ` Muchun Song
2023-08-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v4 13/48] NFSv4.2: dynamically allocate the nfs-xattr shrinkers Qi Zheng
2023-08-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v4 14/48] nfs: dynamically allocate the nfs-acl shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v4 15/48] nfsd: dynamically allocate the nfsd-filecache shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v4 16/48] quota: dynamically allocate the dquota-cache shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v4 17/48] ubifs: dynamically allocate the ubifs-slab shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v4 18/48] rcu: dynamically allocate the rcu-lazy shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-07 14:16 ` Joel Fernandes
2023-08-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v4 19/48] rcu: dynamically allocate the rcu-kfree shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-07 14:14 ` Joel Fernandes
2023-08-08 2:28 ` Muchun Song
2023-08-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v4 20/48] mm: thp: dynamically allocate the thp-related shrinkers Qi Zheng
2023-08-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v4 21/48] sunrpc: dynamically allocate the sunrpc_cred shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v4 22/48] mm: workingset: dynamically allocate the mm-shadow shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v4 23/48] drm/i915: dynamically allocate the i915_gem_mm shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v4 24/48] drm/msm: dynamically allocate the drm-msm_gem shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v4 25/48] drm/panfrost: dynamically allocate the drm-panfrost shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v4 26/48] dm: dynamically allocate the dm-bufio shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v4 27/48] dm zoned: dynamically allocate the dm-zoned-meta shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v4 28/48] md/raid5: dynamically allocate the md-raid5 shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v4 29/48] bcache: dynamically allocate the md-bcache shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v4 30/48] vmw_balloon: dynamically allocate the vmw-balloon shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v4 31/48] virtio_balloon: dynamically allocate the virtio-balloon shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v4 32/48] mbcache: dynamically allocate the mbcache shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v4 33/48] ext4: dynamically allocate the ext4-es shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v4 34/48] jbd2,ext4: dynamically allocate the jbd2-journal shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v4 35/48] nfsd: dynamically allocate the nfsd-client shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v4 36/48] nfsd: dynamically allocate the nfsd-reply shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v4 37/48] xfs: dynamically allocate the xfs-buf shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v4 38/48] xfs: dynamically allocate the xfs-inodegc shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v4 39/48] xfs: dynamically allocate the xfs-qm shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v4 40/48] zsmalloc: dynamically allocate the mm-zspool shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v4 41/48] fs: super: dynamically allocate the s_shrink Qi Zheng
2023-08-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v4 42/48] mm: shrinker: remove old APIs Qi Zheng
2023-08-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v4 43/48] drm/ttm: introduce pool_shrink_rwsem Qi Zheng
2023-08-22 13:56 ` Daniel Vetter
2023-08-23 2:59 ` Qi Zheng
2023-08-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v4 44/48] mm: shrinker: add a secondary array for shrinker_info::{map, nr_deferred} Qi Zheng
2023-08-08 2:12 ` Dave Chinner
2023-08-08 6:32 ` Qi Zheng
2023-08-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v4 45/48] mm: shrinker: make global slab shrink lockless Qi Zheng
2023-08-07 23:28 ` Dave Chinner
2023-08-08 2:24 ` Dave Chinner
2023-08-08 7:22 ` Qi Zheng [this message]
2023-08-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v4 46/48] mm: shrinker: make memcg " Qi Zheng
2023-08-08 2:44 ` Dave Chinner
2023-08-08 7:50 ` Qi Zheng
2023-08-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v4 47/48] mm: shrinker: hold write lock to reparent shrinker nr_deferred Qi Zheng
2023-08-07 11:09 ` [PATCH v4 48/48] mm: shrinker: convert shrinker_rwsem to mutex Qi Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0fdb926c-0d61-d81f-1a52-4ef634b51804@bytedance.com \
--to=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=cel@kernel.org \
--cc=cluster-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=simon.horman@corigine.com \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=tkhai@ya.ru \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
--cc=yujie.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox