From: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Roman Guschin <guroan@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
hannes@cmpxchg.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/oom_kill: count global and memory cgroup oom kills
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 13:32:17 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0f67046d-cdf6-1264-26f6-11c82978c621@yandex-team.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1705230044590.50796@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
On 23.05.2017 10:49, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Mon, 22 May 2017, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
>
>> Nope, they are different. I think we should rephase documentation somehow
>>
>> low - count of reclaims below low level
>> high - count of post-allocation reclaims above high level
>> max - count of direct reclaims
>> oom - count of failed direct reclaims
>> oom_kill - count of oom killer invocations and killed processes
>>
>
> In our kernel, we've maintained counts of oom kills per memcg for years as
> part of memory.oom_control for memcg v1, but we've also found it helpful
> to complement that with another count that specifies the number of
> processes oom killed that were attached to that exact memcg.
>
> In your patch, oom_kill in memory.oom_control specifies that number of oom
> events that resulted in an oom kill of a process from that hierarchy, but
> not the number of processes killed from a specific memcg (the difference
> between oc->memcg and mem_cgroup_from_task(victim)). Not sure if you
> would also find it helpful.
>
This is worth addition. Let's call it "oom_victim" for short.
It allows to locate leaky part if they are spread over sub-containers within common limit.
But doesn't tell which limit caused this kill. For hierarchical limits this might be not so easy.
I think oom_kill better suits for automatic actions - restart affected hierarchy, increase limits, e.t.c.
But oom_victim allows to determine container affected by global oom killer.
So, probably it's worth to merge them together and increment oom_kill by global killer for victim memcg:
if (!is_memcg_oom(oc)) {
count_vm_event(OOM_KILL);
mem_cgroup_count_vm_event(mm, OOM_KILL);
} else
mem_cgroup_event(oc->memcg, OOM_KILL);
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-23 10:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-19 14:22 Konstantin Khlebnikov
2017-05-19 14:32 ` Michal Hocko
2017-05-19 16:34 ` Roman Guschin
2017-05-22 9:11 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2017-05-22 18:05 ` Roman Guschin
2017-05-23 7:49 ` David Rientjes
2017-05-23 10:32 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov [this message]
2017-05-24 20:43 ` David Rientjes
2017-05-25 8:44 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2017-05-23 7:27 ` Michal Hocko
2017-05-23 11:05 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2017-05-23 11:29 ` Tetsuo Handa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0f67046d-cdf6-1264-26f6-11c82978c621@yandex-team.ru \
--to=khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=guroan@gmail.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox