From: Sayali Patil <sayalip@linux.ibm.com>
To: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/13] selftests/mm: skip uffd-wp-mremap if UFFD write-protect is unsupported
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2026 19:56:01 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0e9cea41-7c49-446a-b67b-256584960516@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <457dddf1-04ec-4d1e-8640-b04997fac4f1@kernel.org>
On 12/03/26 18:20, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
> On 3/12/26 13:25, Sayali Patil wrote:
>> The uffd-wp-mremap test requires the UFFD_FEATURE_PAGEFAULT_FLAG_WP
>> capability. On systems where userfaultfd write-protect is
>> not supported, uffd_register() fails and the test reports failures.
>>
>> Check for the required feature at startup and skip the test when the
>> UFFD_FEATURE_PAGEFAULT_FLAG_WP capability is not present,
>> preventing false failures on unsupported configurations.
>>
>> Before patch:
>> running ./uffd-wp-mremap
>> ------------------------
>> [INFO] detected THP size: 256 KiB
>> [INFO] detected THP size: 512 KiB
>> [INFO] detected THP size: 1024 KiB
>> [INFO] detected THP size: 2048 KiB
>> [INFO] detected hugetlb page size: 2048 KiB
>> [INFO] detected hugetlb page size: 1048576 KiB
>> 1..24
>> [RUN] test_one_folio(size=65536, private=false, swapout=false,
>> hugetlb=false)
>> not ok 1 uffd_register() failed
>> [RUN] test_one_folio(size=65536, private=true, swapout=false,
>> hugetlb=false)
>> not ok 2 uffd_register() failed
>> [RUN] test_one_folio(size=65536, private=false, swapout=true,
>> hugetlb=false)
>> not ok 3 uffd_register() failed
>> [RUN] test_one_folio(size=65536, private=true, swapout=true,
>> hugetlb=false)
>> not ok 4 uffd_register() failed
>> [RUN] test_one_folio(size=262144, private=false, swapout=false,
>> hugetlb=false)
>> not ok 5 uffd_register() failed
>> [RUN] test_one_folio(size=524288, private=false, swapout=false,
>> hugetlb=false)
>> not ok 6 uffd_register() failed
>> .
>> .
>> .
>> Bail out! 24 out of 24 tests failed
>> Totals: pass:0 fail:24 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
>> [FAIL]
>> not ok 1 uffd-wp-mremap # exit=1
>>
>> After patch:
>> running ./uffd-wp-mremap
>> ------------------------
>> 1..0 # SKIP uffd-wp feature not supported
>> [SKIP]
>> ok 1 uffd-wp-mremap # SKIP
>>
>> Acked-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Sayali Patil <sayalip@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-wp-mremap.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-wp-mremap.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-wp-mremap.c
>> index 17186d4a4147..73d53a4da389 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-wp-mremap.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-wp-mremap.c
>> @@ -19,6 +19,17 @@ static size_t thpsizes[20];
>> static int nr_hugetlbsizes;
>> static size_t hugetlbsizes[10];
>>
>> +static void uffd_wp_feature_supported(void)
> Likely that function should be called
>
> "check_uffd_wp_feature_supported()"
>
> Because right now it reads as if it would be returning a bool.
>
> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>
>
Thanks for the review. I'll rename it to
"check_uffd_wp_feature_supported()" in the next version.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-13 14:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-12 12:25 [PATCH v2 00/13] selftests/mm: fix failures and robustness improvements Sayali Patil
2026-03-12 12:25 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] selftests/mm: restore default nr_hugepages value during cleanup in charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh Sayali Patil
2026-03-12 12:43 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-03-12 12:25 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] selftests/mm: fix hugetlb pathname construction " Sayali Patil
2026-03-12 12:25 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] selftests/mm: fix hugetlb pathname construction in hugetlb_reparenting_test.sh Sayali Patil
2026-03-12 12:25 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] selftest/mm: fix cgroup task placement and tolerance " Sayali Patil
2026-03-12 12:25 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] selftests/mm: size tmpfs according to PMD page size in split_huge_page_test Sayali Patil
2026-03-12 12:46 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-03-12 12:25 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] selftest/mm: adjust hugepage-mremap test size for large huge pages Sayali Patil
2026-03-12 12:25 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] selftest/mm: register existing mapping with userfaultfd in hugepage-mremap Sayali Patil
2026-03-12 12:25 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] selftests/mm: ensure destination is hugetlb-backed " Sayali Patil
2026-03-12 12:25 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] selftests/mm: skip uffd-wp-mremap if UFFD write-protect is unsupported Sayali Patil
2026-03-12 12:50 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-03-13 14:26 ` Sayali Patil [this message]
2026-03-24 23:56 ` Andrew Morton
2026-03-26 18:01 ` Sayali Patil
2026-03-26 18:38 ` Andrew Morton
2026-03-12 12:25 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] selftests/mm: skip uffd-stress test when nr_pages_per_cpu is zero Sayali Patil
2026-03-12 12:25 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] selftests/mm: fix double increment in linked list cleanup in compaction_test Sayali Patil
2026-03-12 12:51 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-03-12 12:25 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] selftests/mm: move hwpoison setup into run_test() and silence modprobe output for memory-failure category Sayali Patil
2026-03-12 12:25 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] selftests/cgroup: extend test_hugetlb_memcg.c to support all huge page sizes Sayali Patil
2026-03-12 22:05 ` [PATCH v2 00/13] selftests/mm: fix failures and robustness improvements Andrew Morton
2026-03-13 14:16 ` Sayali Patil
2026-03-17 6:00 ` Venkat Rao Bagalkote
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0e9cea41-7c49-446a-b67b-256584960516@linux.ibm.com \
--to=sayalip@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox