linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Donet Tom <donettom@linux.ibm.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>,
	Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm/numa_balancing:Allow migrate on protnone reference with MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY policy
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 18:39:16 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0e633718-2313-4a0f-9907-b0fa5ffa18bc@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZdRneVbsts8t3VAW@tiehlicka>


On 2/20/24 14:18, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 20-02-24 09:27:25, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> [...]
>> 	case MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY:
>> 		if (pol->flags & MPOL_F_MORON) {
>> 			if (!mpol_preferred_should_numa_migrate(thisnid, curnid, pol))
>> 				goto out;
>> 			break;
>> 		}
>>
>> 		/*
>> 		 * use current page if in policy nodemask,
>> 		 * else select nearest allowed node, if any.
>> 		 * If no allowed nodes, use current [!misplaced].
>> 		 */
>> 		if (node_isset(curnid, pol->nodes))
>> 			goto out;
>> 		z = first_zones_zonelist(
>> 				node_zonelist(thisnid, GFP_HIGHUSER),
>> 				gfp_zone(GFP_HIGHUSER),
>> 				&pol->nodes);
>> 		polnid = zone_to_nid(z->zone);
>> 		break;
>>   ....
>> ..
>>         }
>>
>> 	/* Migrate the folio towards the node whose CPU is referencing it */
>> 	if (pol->flags & MPOL_F_MORON) {
>> 		polnid = thisnid;
>>
>> 		if (!should_numa_migrate_memory(current, folio, curnid,
>> 						thiscpu))
>> 			goto out;
>> 	}
>>
>> 	if (curnid != polnid)
>> 		ret = polnid;
>> out:
>> 	mpol_cond_put(pol);
>>
>> 	return ret;
>> }
> Ohh, right this code is confusing as hell. Thanks for the clarification.
> With this in mind. There should be a comment warning about MPOL_F_MOF
> always being unset as the userspace cannot really set it up.
>
> Thanks!
>
Hi Michal

Sorry For the late reply.
If we set  MPOL_F_NUMA_BALANCING from userspace then MPOL_F_MOF and MPOL_F_MORON flags will get set in kernel.

/* Basic parameter sanity check used by both mbind() and set_mempolicy() */
static inline int sanitize_mpol_flags(int *mode, unsigned short *flags)
{
     *flags = *mode & MPOL_MODE_FLAGS;
     *mode &= ~MPOL_MODE_FLAGS;

     if ((unsigned int)(*mode) >=  MPOL_MAX)
         return -EINVAL;

     if ((*flags & MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES) && (*flags & MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES))
         return -EINVAL;

     if (*flags & MPOL_F_NUMA_BALANCING) {
         if (*mode == MPOL_BIND || *mode == MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY)
             *flags |= (MPOL_F_MOF | MPOL_F_MORON);
         else
             return -EINVAL;
}

In current kernel it is supported only for MPOL_BIND and we added suppor for MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY also.

Why MPOL_F_MOF  flag is required?
---------------------------------
For NUMA migration the process memory is unmapped by "task_numa_work" periodically, if unmapped memory got
accessed again then NUMA hinting page fault will occur and in page fault handler the pages get migrated.

If MPOL_F_MOF is not set then "task_numa_work" will not unmap the process pages and NUMA hinting page fault
and migration will not occur. This change has been introduced by commit
fc3147245d193b (mm: numa: Limit NUMA scanning to migrate-on-fault VMAs).

How new implementation works
----------------------------
MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY is able to set  MPOL_F_MOF and MPOL_F_MORON through MPOL_F_NUMA_BALANCING. So NUMA hinting
page faults will occur. In mpol_misplaced if we can do numa migration, we select the currently executing node as the target node
otherwise we end up returning from the function with ret = NUMA_NO_NODE.

So since we are able to set MPOL_F_MOF from userspace through MPOL_F_NUMA_BALANCING, no need to add this comment right?

Thanks
Donet Tom




  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-26 13:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-17  7:31 [PATCH 1/3] mm/mempolicy: Use the already fetched local variable Donet Tom
2024-02-17  7:31 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm/numa_balancing:Allow migrate on protnone reference with MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY policy Donet Tom
2024-02-19 12:07   ` Michal Hocko
2024-02-19 13:44     ` Donet Tom
2024-02-20  6:36       ` Huang, Ying
2024-02-20  6:44         ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2024-02-20  7:23           ` Huang, Ying
2024-02-20  7:46             ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2024-02-20  8:01               ` Huang, Ying
2024-02-19 14:20   ` Michal Hocko
2024-02-19 15:07     ` Donet Tom
2024-02-19 19:12       ` Michal Hocko
2024-02-20  3:57         ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2024-02-20  8:48           ` Michal Hocko
2024-02-26 13:09             ` Donet Tom [this message]
2024-02-20  7:18   ` Huang, Ying
2024-02-20  7:53     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2024-02-20  7:58       ` Huang, Ying
2024-03-03  6:16         ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2024-03-04  1:59           ` Huang, Ying
2024-02-18 21:38 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm/mempolicy: Use the already fetched local variable Andrew Morton
2024-02-19  8:34   ` Donet Tom
2024-02-20  1:21     ` Andrew Morton
2024-02-20  4:10       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2024-02-20  6:25         ` Huang, Ying
2024-02-20  6:32           ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2024-02-20  7:03             ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2024-02-20  7:22               ` Huang, Ying
2024-02-20  9:03                 ` Michal Hocko
2024-03-03  6:17                   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2024-03-04  1:49                     ` Huang, Ying
     [not found] ` <bf7e6779f842fb65cf7bb9b2c617feb2af271cb7.1708097962.git.donettom@linux.ibm.com>
2024-02-19 12:02   ` [PATCH 2/3] mm/mempolicy: Avoid the fallthrough with MPOLD_BIND in mpol_misplaced Michal Hocko
2024-02-19 15:18     ` Donet Tom

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0e633718-2313-4a0f-9907-b0fa5ffa18bc@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=donettom@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
    --cc=ben.widawsky@intel.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox