From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
To: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
Naoya Horiguchi <nao.horiguchi@gmail.com>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
<dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] mm: memory_hotplug: check hwpoisoned page firstly in do_migrate_range()
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2024 16:36:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0e4eb9c6-c3bc-98e4-309b-50e760e753c5@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240827114728.3212578-4-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
On 2024/8/27 19:47, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> The commit b15c87263a69 ("hwpoison, memory_hotplug: allow hwpoisoned
> pages to be offlined") don't handle the hugetlb pages, the endless loop
> still occur if offline a hwpoison hugetlb page, luckly, after the
> commit e591ef7d96d6 ("mm, hwpoison,hugetlb,memory_hotplug: hotremove
> memory section with hwpoisoned hugepage"), the HPageMigratable of hugetlb
> page will be cleared, and the hwpoison hugetlb page will be skipped in
> scan_movable_pages(), so the endless loop issue is fixed.
>
> However if the HPageMigratable() check passed(without reference and lock),
> the hugetlb page may be hwpoisoned, it won't cause issue since the
> hwpoisoned page will be handled correctly in the next movable pages scan
> loop, and it will be isolated in do_migrate_range() but fails to migrate.
> In order to avoid the unnecessary isolation and unify all hwpoisoned page
> handling, let's unconditionally check hwpoison firstly, and if it is a
> hwpoisoned hugetlb page, try to unmap it as the catch all safety net like
> normal page does.
>
> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
> ---
> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> index 9ef776a25b9d..1335fb6ef7fa 100644
> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> @@ -1793,26 +1793,26 @@ static void do_migrate_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
> * folio_nr_pages() may read garbage. This is fine as the outer
> * loop will revisit the split folio later.
> */
> - if (folio_test_large(folio)) {
> + if (folio_test_large(folio))
> pfn = folio_pfn(folio) + folio_nr_pages(folio) - 1;
> - if (folio_test_hugetlb(folio)) {
> - isolate_hugetlb(folio, &source);
> - continue;
> - }
> - }
>
> /*
> * HWPoison pages have elevated reference counts so the migration would
> * fail on them. It also doesn't make any sense to migrate them in the
> * first place. Still try to unmap such a page in case it is still mapped
> - * (e.g. current hwpoison implementation doesn't unmap KSM pages but keep
> - * the unmap as the catch all safety net).
> + * (keep the unmap as the catch all safety net).
I tend to remove "keep the unmap as the catch all safety net" too. I think it's simply
used to describe KSM scene.
Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Thanks.
.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-31 8:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-27 11:47 [PATCH v3 0/5] mm: memory_hotplug: improve do_migrate_range() Kefeng Wang
2024-08-27 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] mm: memory_hotplug: remove head variable in do_migrate_range() Kefeng Wang
2024-09-28 4:55 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-09-28 8:34 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-28 8:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-09-29 1:16 ` Miaohe Lin
2024-09-29 2:04 ` Kefeng Wang
2024-09-29 2:19 ` Miaohe Lin
2024-09-30 9:25 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-09 7:27 ` Kefeng Wang
2024-08-27 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] mm: memory-failure: add unmap_poisoned_folio() Kefeng Wang
2024-08-31 8:16 ` Miaohe Lin
2024-08-27 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] mm: memory_hotplug: check hwpoisoned page firstly in do_migrate_range() Kefeng Wang
2024-08-31 8:36 ` Miaohe Lin [this message]
2024-08-27 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] mm: migrate: add isolate_folio_to_list() Kefeng Wang
2024-08-27 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] mm: memory_hotplug: unify Huge/LRU/non-LRU movable folio isolation Kefeng Wang
2024-08-29 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 5-fix/5] mm: memory_hotplug: unify Huge/LRU/non-LRU movable folio isolation fix Kefeng Wang
2024-08-29 15:19 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-30 1:23 ` Kefeng Wang
2024-08-31 9:01 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] mm: memory_hotplug: unify Huge/LRU/non-LRU movable folio isolation Miaohe Lin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0e4eb9c6-c3bc-98e4-309b-50e760e753c5@huawei.com \
--to=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox