linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>, Shivank Garg <shivankg@amd.com>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ziy@nvidia.com, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,
	lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
	npache@redhat.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com, fengwei.yin@intel.com,
	bharata@amd.com,
	syzbot+2b99589e33edbe9475ca@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] mm/khugepaged: fix race with folio split/free using temporary reference
Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 09:48:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0dc0fef0-ec1d-4971-81e6-0add808a8551@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b19653ae-8c9a-46f1-af93-3d09c3b0759e@arm.com>

On 27.05.25 05:20, Dev Jain wrote:
> 
> On 26/05/25 11:58 pm, Shivank Garg wrote:
>> hpage_collapse_scan_file() calls is_refcount_suitable(), which in turn
>> calls folio_mapcount(). folio_mapcount() checks folio_test_large() before
>> proceeding to folio_large_mapcount(), but there is a race window where the
>> folio may get split/freed between these checks, triggering:
>>
>>     VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_large(folio), folio)
>>
>> Take a temporary reference to the folio in hpage_collapse_scan_file().
>> This stabilizes the folio during refcount check and prevents incorrect
>> large folio detection due to concurrent split/free. Use helper
>> folio_expected_ref_count() + 1 to compare with folio_ref_count()
>> instead of using is_refcount_suitable().
>>
>> Fixes: 05c5323b2a34 ("mm: track mapcount of large folios in single value")
>> Reported-by: syzbot+2b99589e33edbe9475ca@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/6828470d.a70a0220.38f255.000c.GAE@google.com
>> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Shivank Garg <shivankg@amd.com>
>> ---
> 
> The patch looks fine.
> 
> I was just wondering about the implications of this on migration. Earlier
> we had a refcount race between migration and shmem page fault via filemap_get_entry()
> taking a reference and not releasing it till we take the folio lock, which was held
> by the migration path. I would like to *think* that real workloads, when migrating
> pages, will *not* be faulting on those pages simultaneously, just guessing. But now
> we have a kernel thread (khugepaged) racing against migration. I may just be over-speculating.

I'm not quite sure I understand the concern you have. Any temporary 
reference can temporarily block migration, however, the retry logic 
should be able to handle that just fine -- and this code is not really 
special (see filemap_get_entry()).

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb



  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-27  7:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-26 18:28 Shivank Garg
2025-05-26 18:28 ` [PATCH V3 2/2] mm/khugepaged: clean up refcount check using folio_expected_ref_count() Shivank Garg
2025-05-27  3:28   ` Dev Jain
2025-05-27  6:26   ` Baolin Wang
2025-05-27  3:20 ` [PATCH V3 1/2] mm/khugepaged: fix race with folio split/free using temporary reference Dev Jain
2025-05-27  7:48   ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2025-05-27  8:06     ` Dev Jain
2025-05-27  8:40       ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-27  8:57         ` Dev Jain
2025-05-27  6:25 ` Baolin Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0dc0fef0-ec1d-4971-81e6-0add808a8551@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=bharata@amd.com \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=fengwei.yin@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=npache@redhat.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=shivankg@amd.com \
    --cc=syzbot+2b99589e33edbe9475ca@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox