From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
cl@linux.com, penberg@kernel.org, rientjes@google.com,
iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: slub: remove preemption disabling from put_cpu_partial
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 14:40:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0d6c3e3b-c270-bb7d-c038-64ee3f0257cd@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210811111921.85999-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com>
On 8/11/21 1:19 PM, Muchun Song wrote:
> The commit d6e0b7fa1186 ("slub: make dead caches discard free slabs
> immediately") introduced those logic to speed up the destruction of
> per-memcg kmem caches, because kmem caches created for a memory
> cgroup are only destroyed after the last page charged to the cgroup
> is freed at that time. But since commit 9855609bde03 ("mm: memcg/slab:
> use a single set of kmem_caches for all accounted allocations), we
> do not have per-memcg kmem caches anymore. Are those code pointless?
> No, the kmem_cache->cpu_partial can be set to zero by 'echo 0 > /sys/
> kernel/slab/*/cpu_partial'. In this case, the slab page will be put
> into cpu partial list and then moved to node list (because
> slub_cpu_partial() returns zero). However, we can skip putting the
> slab page to cpu partial list and just move it to node list directly.
> We can adjust the condition of kmem_cache_has_cpu_partial() to
> slub_cpu_partial() in __slab_free() and remove those code from
> put_cpu_partial() for simplification.
>
> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Please check again current mmotm/next if this still applies, I think it
shouldn't anymore. Thanks.
> ---
> mm/slub.c | 23 +++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index b6c5205252eb..69c8ada322a0 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -2438,7 +2438,6 @@ static void put_cpu_partial(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page, int drain)
> int pages;
> int pobjects;
>
> - preempt_disable();
> do {
> pages = 0;
> pobjects = 0;
> @@ -2470,16 +2469,7 @@ static void put_cpu_partial(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page, int drain)
> page->pobjects = pobjects;
> page->next = oldpage;
>
> - } while (this_cpu_cmpxchg(s->cpu_slab->partial, oldpage, page)
> - != oldpage);
> - if (unlikely(!slub_cpu_partial(s))) {
> - unsigned long flags;
> -
> - local_irq_save(flags);
> - unfreeze_partials(s, this_cpu_ptr(s->cpu_slab));
> - local_irq_restore(flags);
> - }
> - preempt_enable();
> + } while (this_cpu_cmpxchg(s->cpu_slab->partial, oldpage, page) != oldpage);
> #endif /* CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL */
> }
>
> @@ -3059,9 +3049,7 @@ static void __slab_free(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page,
> was_frozen = new.frozen;
> new.inuse -= cnt;
> if ((!new.inuse || !prior) && !was_frozen) {
> -
> - if (kmem_cache_has_cpu_partial(s) && !prior) {
> -
> + if (slub_cpu_partial(s) && !prior) {
> /*
> * Slab was on no list before and will be
> * partially empty
> @@ -3069,9 +3057,7 @@ static void __slab_free(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page,
> * freeze it.
> */
> new.frozen = 1;
> -
> } else { /* Needs to be taken off a list */
> -
> n = get_node(s, page_to_nid(page));
> /*
> * Speculatively acquire the list_lock.
> @@ -3082,17 +3068,14 @@ static void __slab_free(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page,
> * other processors updating the list of slabs.
> */
> spin_lock_irqsave(&n->list_lock, flags);
> -
> }
> }
> -
> } while (!cmpxchg_double_slab(s, page,
> prior, counters,
> head, new.counters,
> "__slab_free"));
>
> if (likely(!n)) {
> -
> if (likely(was_frozen)) {
> /*
> * The list lock was not taken therefore no list
> @@ -3118,7 +3101,7 @@ static void __slab_free(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page,
> * Objects left in the slab. If it was not on the partial list before
> * then add it.
> */
> - if (!kmem_cache_has_cpu_partial(s) && unlikely(!prior)) {
> + if (unlikely(!prior)) {
> remove_full(s, n, page);
> add_partial(n, page, DEACTIVATE_TO_TAIL);
> stat(s, FREE_ADD_PARTIAL);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-11 12:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-11 11:19 Muchun Song
2021-08-11 12:40 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2021-08-11 14:49 ` Muchun Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0d6c3e3b-c270-bb7d-c038-64ee3f0257cd@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox