From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
<kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>, <mgorman@suse.de>,
<linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/mempolicy: fix potential mpol_new leak in shared_policy_replace
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 17:25:51 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0d306244-748e-9774-8578-525073770a3f@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yjg+hVuJBPGhkfeJ@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On 2022/3/21 16:59, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Sat 19-03-22 18:42:33, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> [...]
>> This would be triggered easily with below code snippet in my virtual machine:
>>
>> shmid = shmget((key_t)5566, 1024 * PAGE_SIZE, 0666|IPC_CREAT);
>> shm = shmat(shmid, 0, 0);
>> loop {
>> mbind(shm, 1024 * PAGE_SIZE, MPOL_LOCAL, mask, maxnode, 0);
>> mbind(shm + 128 * PAGE_SIZE, 128 * PAGE_SIZE, MPOL_DEFAULT, mask, maxnode, 0);
>> }
>>
>> If there're many process doing the above work, mpol_new will be leaked easily.
>> So should I resend this patch with Cc stable? But it seems I'am not supposed
>> to make this decision and the maintainer will take care of this?
>
> I would just add
> Fixes: 42288fe366c4 ("mm: mempolicy: Convert shared_policy mutex to spinlock")
> Cc: stable # 3.8
>
> And also add your above reproducer snippet added to the original changelog.
> This would be more then enough to conclude the importance.
Will do. Many thanks for your patience and suggestion!
>
> Thank you for working hard on this!
Thanks. :)
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-21 9:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-11 9:36 Miaohe Lin
2022-03-14 16:44 ` Michal Hocko
2022-03-15 13:42 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-03-15 15:27 ` Michal Hocko
2022-03-16 6:39 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-03-16 9:56 ` Michal Hocko
2022-03-17 2:05 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-03-17 9:03 ` Michal Hocko
2022-03-17 9:34 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-03-19 10:42 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-03-21 8:59 ` Michal Hocko
2022-03-21 9:25 ` Miaohe Lin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0d306244-748e-9774-8578-525073770a3f@huawei.com \
--to=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox