From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
To: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@kernel.org,
lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
vbabka@suse.cz, rppt@kernel.org, surenb@google.com,
ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
martin.lau@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com, song@kernel.org,
yonghong.song@linux.dev, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me, haoluo@google.com,
jolsa@kernel.org, jackmanb@google.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
ziy@nvidia.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de, clrkwllms@kernel.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
kevin.brodsky@arm.com, dev.jain@arm.com,
yang@os.amperecomputing.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: mmu: use pagetable_alloc_nolock() while stop_machine()
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 12:02:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0d08b4bf-35c5-4c63-964b-ef886b8262d9@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aUPLCPAyxkPeBaoD@e129823.arm.com>
On 18/12/2025 09:36, Yeoreum Yun wrote:
> Hi,
>> On Fri 12-12-25 16:18:32, Yeoreum Yun wrote:
>>> linear_map_split_to_ptes() and __kpti_install_ng_mappings()
>>> are called as callback of stop_machine().
>>> That means these functions context are preemption disabled.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, under PREEMPT_RT, the pagetable_alloc() or
>>> __get_free_pages() couldn't be called in this context
>>> since spin lock that becomes sleepable on RT,
>>> potentially causing a sleep during page allocation.
>>>
>>> To address this, pagetable_alloc_nolock().
>>
>> As you cannot tolerate allocation failure and this is pretty much
>> permanent allocation (AFAIU) why don't you use a static allocation?
>
> Because of when bbl2_noabort is supported, that pages doesn't need to.
> If static alloc, that would be a waste in the system where bbl2_noabort
> is supported.
>
> When I tested, these extra pages are more than 40 in my FVP.
> So, it would be better dynamic allocation and I think since it's quite a
> early time, it's probably not failed that's why former code runs as it
> is.
The required allocation size is also a function of the size of the installed RAM
so a static worst case allocation would consume all the RAM on small systems.
>
> --
> Sincerely,
> Yeoreum Yun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-18 12:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-12 16:18 [PATCH 0/2] introduce pagetable_alloc_nolock() Yeoreum Yun
2025-12-12 16:18 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm: " Yeoreum Yun
2025-12-12 16:18 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: mmu: use pagetable_alloc_nolock() while stop_machine() Yeoreum Yun
2025-12-13 7:05 ` Brendan Jackman
2025-12-14 9:13 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-12-15 9:22 ` Brendan Jackman
2025-12-15 9:34 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-12-15 9:55 ` Brendan Jackman
2025-12-15 10:06 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-12-16 10:10 ` Brendan Jackman
2025-12-16 11:03 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-12-16 11:26 ` Brendan Jackman
2025-12-16 12:01 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-12-16 12:39 ` Brendan Jackman
2025-12-16 13:25 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-12-18 9:30 ` Michal Hocko
2025-12-18 9:36 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-12-18 12:02 ` Ryan Roberts [this message]
2025-12-18 12:17 ` Michal Hocko
2025-12-18 12:24 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-12-16 15:11 ` [PATCH 0/2] introduce pagetable_alloc_nolock() Ryan Roberts
2025-12-16 16:52 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-12-17 9:34 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-12-17 10:48 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-12-17 12:04 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-12-17 12:52 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-12-17 13:15 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-12-17 13:35 ` Brendan Jackman
2025-12-17 13:56 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-12-17 15:10 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-12-17 17:19 ` Brendan Jackman
2025-12-18 7:47 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-12-18 7:52 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-23 22:59 ` Yang Shi
2025-12-24 7:00 ` Yeoreum Yun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0d08b4bf-35c5-4c63-964b-ef886b8262d9@arm.com \
--to=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox