linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
	Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
	Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 05/14] mm: clarify lazy_mmu sleeping constraints
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2026 16:03:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0c72913e-9708-4675-a421-06ed82b7802a@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251215150323.2218608-6-kevin.brodsky@arm.com>

On 12/15/25 16:03, Kevin Brodsky wrote:
> The lazy MMU mode documentation makes clear that an implementation
> should not assume that preemption is disabled or any lock is held
> upon entry to the mode; however it says nothing about what code
> using the lazy MMU interface should expect.
> 
> In practice sleeping is forbidden (for generic code) while the lazy
> MMU mode is active: say it explicitly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>
> ---
>   include/linux/pgtable.h | 14 +++++++++-----
>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/pgtable.h b/include/linux/pgtable.h
> index 652f287c1ef6..1abc4a1c3d72 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pgtable.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pgtable.h
> @@ -225,11 +225,15 @@ static inline int pmd_dirty(pmd_t pmd)
>    * up to date.
>    *
>    * In the general case, no lock is guaranteed to be held between entry and exit
> - * of the lazy mode. So the implementation must assume preemption may be enabled
> - * and cpu migration is possible; it must take steps to be robust against this.
> - * (In practice, for user PTE updates, the appropriate page table lock(s) are
> - * held, but for kernel PTE updates, no lock is held). Nesting is not permitted
> - * and the mode cannot be used in interrupt context.
> + * of the lazy mode. (In practice, for user PTE updates, the appropriate page
> + * table lock(s) are held, but for kernel PTE updates, no lock is held).
> + * The implementation must therefore assume preemption may be enabled upon
> + * entry to the mode and cpu migration is possible; it must take steps to be
> + * robust against this. An implementation may handle this by disabling
> + * preemption, as a consequence generic code may not sleep while the lazy MMU
> + * mode is active.
> + *
> + * Nesting is not permitted and the mode cannot be used in interrupt context.
>    */
>   #ifndef __HAVE_ARCH_ENTER_LAZY_MMU_MODE
>   static inline void arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode(void) {}

Acked-by: David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) <david@kernel.org>

-- 
Cheers

David


  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-09 15:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-15 15:03 [PATCH v6 00/14] Nesting support for lazy MMU mode Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-15 15:03 ` [PATCH v6 01/14] powerpc/64s: Do not re-activate batched TLB flush Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-15 15:03 ` [PATCH v6 02/14] x86/xen: simplify flush_lazy_mmu() Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-15 15:03 ` [PATCH v6 03/14] powerpc/mm: implement arch_flush_lazy_mmu_mode() Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-16  5:14   ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-12-15 15:03 ` [PATCH v6 04/14] sparc/mm: " Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-15 15:03 ` [PATCH v6 05/14] mm: clarify lazy_mmu sleeping constraints Kevin Brodsky
2026-01-09 15:03   ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) [this message]
2025-12-15 15:03 ` [PATCH v6 06/14] mm: introduce CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_LAZY_MMU_MODE Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-15 15:03 ` [PATCH v6 07/14] mm: introduce generic lazy_mmu helpers Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-15 15:03 ` [PATCH v6 08/14] mm: bail out of lazy_mmu_mode_* in interrupt context Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-15 15:03 ` [PATCH v6 09/14] mm: enable lazy_mmu sections to nest Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-15 15:03 ` [PATCH v6 10/14] arm64: mm: replace TIF_LAZY_MMU with is_lazy_mmu_mode_active() Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-15 15:03 ` [PATCH v6 11/14] powerpc/mm: replace batch->active " Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-15 15:03 ` [PATCH v6 12/14] sparc/mm: " Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-15 15:03 ` [PATCH v6 13/14] x86/xen: use lazy_mmu_state when context-switching Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-15 15:03 ` [PATCH v6 14/14] mm: Add basic tests for lazy_mmu Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-17  4:14   ` Andrew Morton
2025-12-17  9:26     ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-17 10:01       ` Ryan Roberts
2025-12-17 15:37         ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-17 15:46         ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-12-17 16:10           ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-17 16:38     ` [PATCH] powerpc/mm: export symbols for lazy_mmu_mode KUnit tests Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-17 16:45       ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-12-17 17:30         ` Andrew Morton
2025-12-17 17:37           ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-21 23:42       ` kernel test robot
2025-12-17 16:38     ` [PATCH] mm: Add basic tests for lazy_mmu - fix for powerpc Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-18 10:05     ` [PATCH] sparc/mm: export symbols for lazy_mmu_mode KUnit tests Kevin Brodsky
2026-01-09 15:07   ` [PATCH v6 14/14] mm: Add basic tests for lazy_mmu David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-15 16:52 ` [PATCH v6 00/14] Nesting support for lazy MMU mode Yeoreum Yun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0c72913e-9708-4675-a421-06ed82b7802a@kernel.org \
    --to=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andreas@gaisler.com \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=venkat88@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    --cc=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox