From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pl1-f200.google.com (mail-pl1-f200.google.com [209.85.214.200]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B6DB6B0010 for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 18:41:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pl1-f200.google.com with SMTP id f5-v6so22096730plf.11 for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 15:41:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org (smtp.codeaurora.org. [198.145.29.96]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t6-v6si18197410pgk.306.2018.10.17.15.41.38 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 17 Oct 2018 15:41:38 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] serial: set suppress_bind_attrs flag only if builtin References: <20181017140311.28679-1-anders.roxell@linaro.org> <20181017150546.0d451252950214bec74a6fc8@linux-foundation.org> <20181017153223.6c4e5156895dad7973f7d059@linux-foundation.org> From: Jeffrey Hugo Message-ID: <0bc08889-4801-33b6-8273-5cf2123baba5@codeaurora.org> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 16:41:34 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20181017153223.6c4e5156895dad7973f7d059@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Andrew Morton Cc: Anders Roxell , Arnd Bergmann , gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, tj@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On 10/17/2018 4:32 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 16:21:08 -0600 Jeffrey Hugo wrote: > >> On 10/17/2018 4:05 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: >>> On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 16:03:10 +0200 Anders Roxell wrote: >>> >>>> Cc: Arnd Bergmann >>>> Co-developed-by: Arnd Bergmann >>>> Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell >>> >>> This should have Arnd's Signed-off-by: as well. >> >> I'm just interested to know, why? > > So that Arnd certifies that > > (a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I > have the right to submit it under the open source license > indicated in the file; or > > and all the other stuff in Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst > section 11! > > Also, because section 12 says so :) And that final sentence is, I > believe, appropriate. Ah, interesting. I see that the documentation was updated since I was told last year in the same situation by a different maintainer that co-authors should not have SOB lines on the patch. Good to know. Thanks for illuminating me. -- Jeffrey Hugo Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.