From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4BD5C433E2 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 07:29:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 283272076C for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 07:29:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b="V5U9ZDb5" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 283272076C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id BA18D6B0037; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 03:29:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id B52B16B0055; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 03:29:34 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id A417B6B005A; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 03:29:34 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0129.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.129]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AC136B0037 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 03:29:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin17.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 494DF180AD81A for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 07:29:34 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77268099468.17.step81_1d01a5727118 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin17.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BEE8180D0186 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 07:29:34 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: step81_1d01a5727118 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 5979 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) by imf45.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 07:29:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 08G6Whgp191066; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 03:29:29 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=subject : to : cc : references : from : message-id : date : mime-version : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=AWZZJFJRXFs7fou2XZXqNHA6HWBjC2PWD4vfkVc54/Y=; b=V5U9ZDb5RgrjTzJ4py/zbwCzG57C+CZnOKGT6U1l7n6rILSVSwQQpNNWvwnDIP3MyAXB 2LQGaaotTGpArlCXOSPAp30VZxe5ifTS8wDjL++pXdUXLAYNBtkMr79rsmbw1p0DOEHZ x9CY5+bkTEdSLNheBSWIEuGuuImtkQpb3hTkm+0n/4XbHFs/M/JZuhRSLAjUeGQ3s2oO xTMYDKTyFuVkf7mNkPh5iG3lFhwmjZ+fHWpp22YVFU6lSUxL+l5+PKWRQjW4QXaMvuRw WxYxF9Mfn2EerUtLpz/b68kunw8NqvvANkb4AlVyaURGK9GYawuJOgyMS9VNF6EjxgL1 hA== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 33kc2t3r0r-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 16 Sep 2020 03:29:29 -0400 Received: from m0098421.ppops.net (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 08G6ZEi5002492; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 03:29:28 -0400 Received: from ppma06fra.de.ibm.com (48.49.7a9f.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [159.122.73.72]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 33kc2t3qyn-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 16 Sep 2020 03:29:28 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma06fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma06fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 08G76v34000817; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 07:29:26 GMT Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay09.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.194]) by ppma06fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 33k5u7r6s4-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 16 Sep 2020 07:29:26 +0000 Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.61]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 08G7TNjO20644226 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 16 Sep 2020 07:29:23 GMT Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D58211C052; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 07:29:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60EA111C050; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 07:29:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pomme.local (unknown [9.145.183.110]) by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 07:29:22 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] mm: replace memmap_context by meminit_context To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, David Hildenbrand , Oscar Salvador , mhocko@suse.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, "Rafael J . Wysocki" , nathanl@linux.ibm.com, cheloha@linux.ibm.com, Tony Luck , Fenghua Yu , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org References: <20200915121541.GD4649@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20200915132624.9723-1-ldufour@linux.ibm.com> <20200916063325.GK142621@kroah.com> From: Laurent Dufour Message-ID: <0b3f2eb1-0efa-a491-c509-d16a7e18d8e8@linux.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 09:29:22 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200916063325.GK142621@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235,18.0.687 definitions=2020-09-16_02:2020-09-15,2020-09-16 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 impostorscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1015 malwarescore=0 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=627 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2009160047 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 1BEE8180D0186 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 100.00] X-Rspamd-Server: rspam01 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Le 16/09/2020 =C3=A0 08:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 03:26:24PM +0200, Laurent Dufour wrote: >> The memmap_context enum is used to detect whether a memory operation i= s due >> to a hot-add operation or happening at boot time. >> >> Make it general to the hotplug operation and rename it as meminit_cont= ext. >> >> There is no functional change introduced by this patch >> >> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand >> Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour >> --- >> arch/ia64/mm/init.c | 6 +++--- >> include/linux/mm.h | 2 +- >> include/linux/mmzone.h | 11 ++++++++--- >> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 2 +- >> mm/page_alloc.c | 10 +++++----- >> 5 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) >=20 > >=20 > This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the > stable kernel tree. Please read: > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules= .html > for how to do this properly. >=20 > Hi Greg, I'm sorry, I read that document few days ago before sending the series an= d again=20 this morning, but I can't figure out what I missed (following option 1). Should the "Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org" tag be on each patch of the serie= s even=20 if the whole series has been sent to stable ? Should the whole series sent again (v4) instead of sending a fix as a rep= ly to ? Thanks, Laurent.