linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: maddy@linux.ibm.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au, npiggin@gmail.com,
	christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com,
	Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, vbabka@suse.cz, rppt@kernel.org,
	surenb@google.com, mhocko@suse.com, masahiroy@kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "mm: fix MAX_FOLIO_ORDER on powerpc configs with hugetlb"
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 07:17:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0b007374-1058-487c-8033-4f0d2830dc89@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251204023358.54107-1-skhan@linuxfoundation.org>

Hi,

On 12/4/25 03:33, Shuah Khan wrote:
> This reverts commit 39231e8d6ba7f794b566fd91ebd88c0834a23b98.

That was supposed to fix powerpc handling though. So I think we have to
understand what is happening here.

> 
> Enabling HAVE_GIGANTIC_FOLIOS broke kernel build and git clone on two
> systems. git fetch-pack fails when cloning large repos and make hangs
> or errors out of Makefile.build with Error: 139. These failures are
> random with git clone failing after fetching 1% of the objects, and
> make hangs while compiling random files.

On which architecture do we see these issues and with which kernel configs?
Can you share one?

> 
> The blow is is one of the git clone failures:
> 
> git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git linux_6.19
> Cloning into 'linux_6.19'...
> remote: Enumerating objects: 11173575, done.
> remote: Counting objects: 100% (785/785), done.
> remote: Compressing objects: 100% (373/373), done.
> remote: Total 11173575 (delta 534), reused 505 (delta 411), pack-reused 11172790 (from 1)
> Receiving objects: 100% (11173575/11173575), 3.00 GiB | 7.08 MiB/s, done.
> Resolving deltas: 100% (9195212/9195212), done.
> fatal: did not receive expected object 0002003e951b5057c16de5a39140abcbf6e44e50
> fatal: fetch-pack: invalid index-pack output

If I would have to guess, these symptoms match what we saw between commit
adfb6609c680 ("mm/huge_memory: initialise the tags of the huge zero folio")
and commit 5bebe8de1926 ("mm/huge_memory: Fix initialization of huge zero folio").

5bebe8de1926 went into v6.18-rc7.

Just to be sure, are you sure we were able to reproduce this issue with a
v6.18-rc7 or even v6.18 that contains 5bebe8de1926?

Bisecting might give you wrong results, as the problems of adfb6609c680 do not
reproduce reliably.


The confusing bit is that MAX_FOLIO_ORDER is mostly used for warnings:

$ git grep MAX_FOLIO_ORDER
include/linux/mm.h:#define MAX_FOLIO_ORDER              MAX_PAGE_ORDER
include/linux/mm.h:#define MAX_FOLIO_ORDER              PFN_SECTION_SHIFT
include/linux/mm.h:#define MAX_FOLIO_ORDER              get_order(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT) ? SZ_16G : SZ_1G)
include/linux/mm.h:#define MAX_FOLIO_ORDER              PUD_ORDER
include/linux/mm.h:#define MAX_FOLIO_NR_PAGES   (1UL << MAX_FOLIO_ORDER)
mm/hugetlb.c:   BUILD_BUG_ON_INVALID(HUGETLB_PAGE_ORDER > MAX_FOLIO_ORDER);
mm/hugetlb.c:   WARN_ON(order > MAX_FOLIO_ORDER);
mm/internal.h:  VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(order > MAX_FOLIO_ORDER);
mm/memremap.c:  if (WARN_ONCE(pgmap->vmemmap_shift > MAX_FOLIO_ORDER,
mm/page_alloc.c:        if (WARN_ON_ONCE((gfp_mask & __GFP_COMP) && order > MAX_FOLIO_ORDER))


And MAX_FOLIO_NR_PAGES (derived from MAX_FOLIO_ORDER) is only used in a debug helper

$ git grep MAX_FOLIO_NR_PAGES
include/linux/mm.h:#define MAX_FOLIO_NR_PAGES   (1UL << MAX_FOLIO_ORDER)
mm/util.c:      if (ps->idx < MAX_FOLIO_NR_PAGES) {


> 
> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
> ---
>   arch/powerpc/Kconfig                   |  1 -
>   arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype |  1 +
>   include/linux/mm.h                     | 13 +++----------
>   mm/Kconfig                             |  7 -------
>   4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> index 9537a61ebae0..e24f4d88885a 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> @@ -137,7 +137,6 @@ config PPC
>   	select ARCH_HAS_DMA_OPS			if PPC64
>   	select ARCH_HAS_FORTIFY_SOURCE
>   	select ARCH_HAS_GCOV_PROFILE_ALL
> -	select ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE		if ARCH_SUPPORTS_HUGETLBFS
>   	select ARCH_HAS_KCOV
>   	select ARCH_HAS_KERNEL_FPU_SUPPORT	if PPC64 && PPC_FPU
>   	select ARCH_HAS_MEMBARRIER_CALLBACKS
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype b/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype
> index 4c321a8ea896..7b527d18aa5e 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype
> @@ -423,6 +423,7 @@ config PPC_64S_HASH_MMU
>   config PPC_RADIX_MMU
>   	bool "Radix MMU Support"
>   	depends on PPC_BOOK3S_64
> +	select ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE
>   	default y
>   	help
>   	  Enable support for the Power ISA 3.0 Radix style MMU. Currently this
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index 7c79b3369b82..d16b33bacc32 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -2074,7 +2074,7 @@ static inline unsigned long folio_nr_pages(const struct folio *folio)
>   	return folio_large_nr_pages(folio);
>   }
>   
> -#if !defined(CONFIG_HAVE_GIGANTIC_FOLIOS)
> +#if !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE)
>   /*
>    * We don't expect any folios that exceed buddy sizes (and consequently
>    * memory sections).
> @@ -2087,17 +2087,10 @@ static inline unsigned long folio_nr_pages(const struct folio *folio)
>    * pages are guaranteed to be contiguous.
>    */
>   #define MAX_FOLIO_ORDER		PFN_SECTION_SHIFT
> -#elif defined(CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE)
> -/*
> - * There is no real limit on the folio size. We limit them to the maximum we
> - * currently expect (see CONFIG_HAVE_GIGANTIC_FOLIOS): with hugetlb, we expect
> - * no folios larger than 16 GiB on 64bit and 1 GiB on 32bit.
> - */
> -#define MAX_FOLIO_ORDER		get_order(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT) ? SZ_16G : SZ_1G)
>   #else
>   /*
> - * Without hugetlb, gigantic folios that are bigger than a single PUD are
> - * currently impossible.
> + * There is no real limit on the folio size. We limit them to the maximum we
> + * currently expect (e.g., hugetlb, dax).
>    */
>   #define MAX_FOLIO_ORDER		PUD_ORDER
>   #endif
> diff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig
> index ca3f146bc705..0e26f4fc8717 100644
> --- a/mm/Kconfig
> +++ b/mm/Kconfig
> @@ -908,13 +908,6 @@ config PAGE_MAPCOUNT
>   config PGTABLE_HAS_HUGE_LEAVES
>   	def_bool TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE || HUGETLB_PAGE
>   
> -#
> -# We can end up creating gigantic folio.
> -#
> -config HAVE_GIGANTIC_FOLIOS
> -	def_bool (HUGETLB_PAGE && ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE) || \
> -		 (ZONE_DEVICE && HAVE_ARCH_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_PUD)
> -
>   # TODO: Allow to be enabled without THP
>   config ARCH_SUPPORTS_HUGE_PFNMAP
>   	def_bool n


-- 
Cheers

David


  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-04  6:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-04  2:33 Shuah Khan
2025-12-04  6:17 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) [this message]
2025-12-04  6:35   ` Mike Rapoport
2025-12-04 17:03     ` Shuah Khan
2025-12-04 19:38       ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-04 20:59       ` Mike Rapoport
2025-12-04 21:27 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-12-04 21:57 ` Andrew Morton
2025-12-04 22:12   ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-05  7:01   ` Mike Rapoport
2025-12-05  7:05     ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-05  7:41       ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2025-12-05 18:19         ` Andrew Morton
2025-12-04 22:16 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-04 23:23   ` Shuah Khan
2025-12-05  6:50     ` Mike Rapoport

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0b007374-1058-487c-8033-4f0d2830dc89@kernel.org \
    --to=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox