linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Copy-on-write poison recovery
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 13:19:57 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0a67888e-6cf4-3a9d-32b1-adbbfcaf2aec@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <85b1b706-c3c2-6316-6dd5-ba1b4306d772@linux.alibaba.com>



在 2022/10/23 PM11:52, Shuai Xue 写道:
> 
> 
> 在 2022/10/22 AM4:01, Tony Luck 写道:
>> Part 1 deals with the process that triggered the copy on write
>> fault with a store to a shared read-only page. That process is
>> send a SIGBUS with the usual machine check decoration to specify
>> the virtual address of the lost page, together with the scope.
>>
>> Part 2 sets up to asynchronously take the page with the uncorrected
>> error offline to prevent additional machine check faults. H/t to
>> Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> and Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
>> for pointing me to the existing function to queue a call to
>> memory_failure().
>>
>> On x86 there is some duplicate reporting (because the error is
>> also signalled by the memory controller as well as by the core
>> that triggered the machine check). Console logs look like this:
>>
>> [ 1647.723403] mce: [Hardware Error]: Machine check events logged
>> 	Machine check from kernel copy routine
>>
>> [ 1647.723414] MCE: Killing einj_mem_uc:3600 due to hardware memory corruption fault at 7f3309503400
>> 	x86 fault handler sends SIGBUS to child process
>>
>> [ 1647.735183] Memory failure: 0x905b92d: recovery action for dirty LRU page: Recovered
>> 	Async call to memory_failure() from copy on write path
> 
> The recovery action might also be handled asynchronously in CMCI uc_decode_notifier
> handler signaled by memory controller, right?
> 
> I have a one more memory failure log than yours.
> 
> [ 3187.485742] MCE: Killing einj_mem_uc:31746 due to hardware memory corruption fault at 7fc4bf7cf400
> [ 3187.740620] Memory failure: 0x1a3b80: recovery action for dirty LRU page: Recovered
> 	uc_decode_notifier() processes memory controller report
> 
> [ 3187.748272] Memory failure: 0x1a3b80: already hardware poisoned
> 	Workqueue: events memory_failure_work_func // queued by ghes_do_memory_failure
> 
> [ 3187.754194] Memory failure: 0x1a3b80: already hardware poisoned
> 	Workqueue: events memory_failure_work_func // queued by __wp_page_copy_user
> 
> [ 3188.615920] MCE: Killing einj_mem_uc:31745 due to hardware memory corruption fault at 7fc4bf7cf400
> 
> Best Regards,
> Shuai

Tested-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>

Thank you.
Shuai

> 
>>
>> [ 1647.748397] Memory failure: 0x905b92d: already hardware poisoned
>> 	uc_decode_notifier() processes memory controller report
>>
>> [ 1647.761313] MCE: Killing einj_mem_uc:3599 due to hardware memory corruption fault at 7f3309503400
>> 	Parent process tries to read poisoned page. Page has been unmapped, so
>> 	#PF handler sends SIGBUS
>>
>>
>> Tony Luck (2):
>>   mm, hwpoison: Try to recover from copy-on write faults
>>   mm, hwpoison: When copy-on-write hits poison, take page offline
>>
>>  include/linux/highmem.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  include/linux/mm.h      |  5 ++++-
>>  mm/memory.c             | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>>  3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>


  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-26  5:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-17 23:42 [RFC PATCH] mm, hwpoison: Recover from copy-on-write machine checks Tony Luck
2022-10-18  8:43 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-10-18 17:52   ` Luck, Tony
2022-10-19 17:08     ` [PATCH v2] mm, hwpoison: Try to recover from copy-on write faults Tony Luck
2022-10-19 17:45       ` Dan Williams
2022-10-19 20:30         ` Luck, Tony
2022-10-20  1:57       ` Shuai Xue
2022-10-20 20:05         ` Tony Luck
2022-10-21  1:38           ` Miaohe Lin
2022-10-21  3:57             ` Luck, Tony
2022-10-21  1:52           ` Shuai Xue
2022-10-21  4:08             ` Tony Luck
2022-10-21  4:11               ` David Laight
2022-10-21  4:41                 ` Luck, Tony
2022-10-21  9:29                   ` Shuai Xue
2022-10-21 16:30                     ` Luck, Tony
2022-10-23 15:04                       ` Shuai Xue
2022-10-21  6:57               ` Shuai Xue
2022-10-21 20:01       ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Copy-on-write poison recovery Tony Luck
2022-10-21 20:01         ` [PATCH v3 1/2] mm, hwpoison: Try to recover from copy-on write faults Tony Luck
2022-10-25  5:46           ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-10-28  2:11           ` Miaohe Lin
2022-10-28 16:09             ` Luck, Tony
2022-11-02 14:27               ` Alexander Potapenko
2022-11-02 14:30                 ` Alexander Potapenko
2022-10-21 20:01         ` [PATCH v3 2/2] mm, hwpoison: When copy-on-write hits poison, take page offline Tony Luck
2022-10-28  2:28           ` Miaohe Lin
2022-10-28 16:13             ` Luck, Tony
2022-10-29  1:55               ` Miaohe Lin
2022-10-23 15:52         ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Copy-on-write poison recovery Shuai Xue
2022-10-26  5:19           ` Shuai Xue [this message]
2022-10-31 20:10         ` [PATCH v4 " Tony Luck
2022-10-31 20:10           ` [PATCH v4 1/2] mm, hwpoison: Try to recover from copy-on write faults Tony Luck
2022-10-31 20:10           ` [PATCH v4 2/2] mm, hwpoison: When copy-on-write hits poison, take page offline Tony Luck
2023-05-18 21:49             ` Jane Chu
2023-05-18 22:10               ` Luck, Tony
2023-05-19  7:28               ` Greg Kroah-Hartman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0a67888e-6cf4-3a9d-32b1-adbbfcaf2aec@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=naoya.horiguchi@nec.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox