From: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Copy-on-write poison recovery
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 13:19:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0a67888e-6cf4-3a9d-32b1-adbbfcaf2aec@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <85b1b706-c3c2-6316-6dd5-ba1b4306d772@linux.alibaba.com>
在 2022/10/23 PM11:52, Shuai Xue 写道:
>
>
> 在 2022/10/22 AM4:01, Tony Luck 写道:
>> Part 1 deals with the process that triggered the copy on write
>> fault with a store to a shared read-only page. That process is
>> send a SIGBUS with the usual machine check decoration to specify
>> the virtual address of the lost page, together with the scope.
>>
>> Part 2 sets up to asynchronously take the page with the uncorrected
>> error offline to prevent additional machine check faults. H/t to
>> Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> and Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
>> for pointing me to the existing function to queue a call to
>> memory_failure().
>>
>> On x86 there is some duplicate reporting (because the error is
>> also signalled by the memory controller as well as by the core
>> that triggered the machine check). Console logs look like this:
>>
>> [ 1647.723403] mce: [Hardware Error]: Machine check events logged
>> Machine check from kernel copy routine
>>
>> [ 1647.723414] MCE: Killing einj_mem_uc:3600 due to hardware memory corruption fault at 7f3309503400
>> x86 fault handler sends SIGBUS to child process
>>
>> [ 1647.735183] Memory failure: 0x905b92d: recovery action for dirty LRU page: Recovered
>> Async call to memory_failure() from copy on write path
>
> The recovery action might also be handled asynchronously in CMCI uc_decode_notifier
> handler signaled by memory controller, right?
>
> I have a one more memory failure log than yours.
>
> [ 3187.485742] MCE: Killing einj_mem_uc:31746 due to hardware memory corruption fault at 7fc4bf7cf400
> [ 3187.740620] Memory failure: 0x1a3b80: recovery action for dirty LRU page: Recovered
> uc_decode_notifier() processes memory controller report
>
> [ 3187.748272] Memory failure: 0x1a3b80: already hardware poisoned
> Workqueue: events memory_failure_work_func // queued by ghes_do_memory_failure
>
> [ 3187.754194] Memory failure: 0x1a3b80: already hardware poisoned
> Workqueue: events memory_failure_work_func // queued by __wp_page_copy_user
>
> [ 3188.615920] MCE: Killing einj_mem_uc:31745 due to hardware memory corruption fault at 7fc4bf7cf400
>
> Best Regards,
> Shuai
Tested-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
Thank you.
Shuai
>
>>
>> [ 1647.748397] Memory failure: 0x905b92d: already hardware poisoned
>> uc_decode_notifier() processes memory controller report
>>
>> [ 1647.761313] MCE: Killing einj_mem_uc:3599 due to hardware memory corruption fault at 7f3309503400
>> Parent process tries to read poisoned page. Page has been unmapped, so
>> #PF handler sends SIGBUS
>>
>>
>> Tony Luck (2):
>> mm, hwpoison: Try to recover from copy-on write faults
>> mm, hwpoison: When copy-on-write hits poison, take page offline
>>
>> include/linux/highmem.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/linux/mm.h | 5 ++++-
>> mm/memory.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>> 3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-26 5:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-17 23:42 [RFC PATCH] mm, hwpoison: Recover from copy-on-write machine checks Tony Luck
2022-10-18 8:43 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-10-18 17:52 ` Luck, Tony
2022-10-19 17:08 ` [PATCH v2] mm, hwpoison: Try to recover from copy-on write faults Tony Luck
2022-10-19 17:45 ` Dan Williams
2022-10-19 20:30 ` Luck, Tony
2022-10-20 1:57 ` Shuai Xue
2022-10-20 20:05 ` Tony Luck
2022-10-21 1:38 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-10-21 3:57 ` Luck, Tony
2022-10-21 1:52 ` Shuai Xue
2022-10-21 4:08 ` Tony Luck
2022-10-21 4:11 ` David Laight
2022-10-21 4:41 ` Luck, Tony
2022-10-21 9:29 ` Shuai Xue
2022-10-21 16:30 ` Luck, Tony
2022-10-23 15:04 ` Shuai Xue
2022-10-21 6:57 ` Shuai Xue
2022-10-21 20:01 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Copy-on-write poison recovery Tony Luck
2022-10-21 20:01 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] mm, hwpoison: Try to recover from copy-on write faults Tony Luck
2022-10-25 5:46 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-10-28 2:11 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-10-28 16:09 ` Luck, Tony
2022-11-02 14:27 ` Alexander Potapenko
2022-11-02 14:30 ` Alexander Potapenko
2022-10-21 20:01 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] mm, hwpoison: When copy-on-write hits poison, take page offline Tony Luck
2022-10-28 2:28 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-10-28 16:13 ` Luck, Tony
2022-10-29 1:55 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-10-23 15:52 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Copy-on-write poison recovery Shuai Xue
2022-10-26 5:19 ` Shuai Xue [this message]
2022-10-31 20:10 ` [PATCH v4 " Tony Luck
2022-10-31 20:10 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] mm, hwpoison: Try to recover from copy-on write faults Tony Luck
2022-10-31 20:10 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] mm, hwpoison: When copy-on-write hits poison, take page offline Tony Luck
2023-05-18 21:49 ` Jane Chu
2023-05-18 22:10 ` Luck, Tony
2023-05-19 7:28 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0a67888e-6cf4-3a9d-32b1-adbbfcaf2aec@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=naoya.horiguchi@nec.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox