linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lgoncalv@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] seqlock: Do the lockdep annotation before locking in do_write_seqcount_begin_nested()
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2023 18:25:56 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0a0c768c-227d-c0cd-1b91-5a884d161c1b@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230626081254.XmorFrhs@linutronix.de>

On 2023/06/26 17:12, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2023-06-24 15:54:12 [+0900], Tetsuo Handa wrote:
>> Why not to do the same on the end side?
>>
>>  static inline void do_write_seqcount_end(seqcount_t *s)
>>  {
>> - 	seqcount_release(&s->dep_map, _RET_IP_);
>>  	do_raw_write_seqcount_end(s);
>> +	seqcount_release(&s->dep_map, _RET_IP_);
>>  }
> 
> I don't have a compelling argument for doing it. It is probably better
> to release the lock from lockdep's point of view and then really release
> it (so it can't be acquired before it is released).

We must do it because this is a source of possible printk() deadlock.
Otherwise, I will nack on PATCH 2/2.

> 
> Looking at other locking primitives (spin_lock_unlock(),
> mutex_unlock(),…) that is what they do in the unlock path: lockdep
> annotation followed by the actual operation. Therefore I would keep the
> current ordering to remain in-sync with the other primitives.



  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-26  9:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-23 17:12 [PATCH v2 0/2] seqlock,mm: lockdep annotation + write_seqlock_irqsave() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-06-23 17:12 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] seqlock: Do the lockdep annotation before locking in do_write_seqcount_begin_nested() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-06-24  6:54   ` Tetsuo Handa
2023-06-26  8:12     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-06-26  9:25       ` Tetsuo Handa [this message]
2023-06-26 10:48         ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-26 11:26           ` Tetsuo Handa
2023-06-26 11:35             ` Michal Hocko
2023-06-26 12:27               ` Tetsuo Handa
2023-06-26 13:16                 ` Michal Hocko
2023-06-26 12:46               ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-06-26 13:13           ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-06-26 14:44       ` Petr Mladek
2023-06-28 12:14         ` Tetsuo Handa
2023-07-27 15:10           ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-07-29  5:31             ` Tetsuo Handa
2023-07-29 11:05               ` Tetsuo Handa
2023-07-31 14:25                 ` Michal Hocko
2023-08-03 13:18                   ` Tetsuo Handa
2023-08-03 14:49                     ` Michal Hocko
2023-08-04 13:27                       ` Tetsuo Handa
2023-08-07  8:20                         ` Michal Hocko
2023-06-26 12:56   ` Mel Gorman
2023-06-23 17:12 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/page_alloc: Use write_seqlock_irqsave() instead write_seqlock() + local_irq_save() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-06-23 18:17   ` Michal Hocko
2023-06-23 20:15     ` [PATCH v3 " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-06-26  7:56       ` David Hildenbrand
2023-06-26 13:14       ` Mel Gorman
2023-06-28 13:56       ` Michal Hocko
2023-06-25  2:27 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] seqlock,mm: lockdep annotation + write_seqlock_irqsave() Tetsuo Handa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0a0c768c-227d-c0cd-1b91-5a884d161c1b@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    --to=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
    --cc=lgoncalv@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox