linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
	David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [akpm-mm:mm-new 418/422] fs/orangefs/file.c:414:9: sparse: sparse: dereference of noderef expression
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 10:56:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <09bb7453-a2d7-45f4-a69a-ceddcf6fe809@lucifer.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202601201701.IhxeGffs-lkp@intel.com>

On Tue, Jan 20, 2026 at 05:10:47PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Lorenzo,
>
> FYI, the error/warning was bisected to this commit, please ignore it if it's irrelevant.
>
> tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-new
> head:   e4348a62bb1acacafcdeb149c9363291fae08c0c
> commit: ccbdd8044f13617fe9f2bce61aed556314544664 [418/422] mm: update all remaining mmap_prepare users to use vma_flags_t
> config: arm-randconfig-r131-20260120 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260120/202601201701.IhxeGffs-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 11.5.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260120/202601201701.IhxeGffs-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
>
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202601201701.IhxeGffs-lkp@intel.com/
>
> sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
> >> fs/orangefs/file.c:414:9: sparse: sparse: dereference of noderef expression
>    fs/orangefs/file.c: note: in included file (through arch/arm/include/asm/cacheflush.h, include/linux/cacheflush.h, include/linux/highmem.h, ...):
>    include/linux/mm.h:1048:16: sparse: sparse: dereference of noderef expression
>    include/linux/mm.h:1048:16: sparse: sparse: dereference of noderef expression
>    include/linux/mm.h:1199:46: sparse: sparse: dereference of noderef expression
>    include/linux/mm.h:1199:46: sparse: sparse: dereference of noderef expression
>    fs/orangefs/file.c:415:9: sparse: sparse: dereference of noderef expression
>    include/linux/mm.h:1048:16: sparse: sparse: dereference of noderef expression
>    include/linux/mm.h:1048:16: sparse: sparse: dereference of noderef expression
>    include/linux/mm.h:1216:48: sparse: sparse: dereference of noderef expression
>    include/linux/mm.h:1216:48: sparse: sparse: dereference of noderef expression
> --
> >> fs/ramfs/file-nommu.c:267:40: sparse: sparse: dereference of noderef expression
> >> fs/ramfs/file-nommu.c:267:40: sparse: sparse: dereference of noderef expression
>    fs/ramfs/file-nommu.c: note: in included file:
>    include/linux/mm.h:1954:16: sparse: sparse: dereference of noderef expression
>    include/linux/mm.h:1954:16: sparse: sparse: dereference of noderef expression
>    include/linux/mm.h:1048:16: sparse: sparse: dereference of noderef expression
>    include/linux/mm.h:1954:16: sparse: sparse: dereference of noderef expression
>    include/linux/mm.h:1048:16: sparse: sparse: dereference of noderef expression
>
> vim +414 fs/orangefs/file.c
>
>    397
>    398	/*
>    399	 * Memory map a region of a file.
>    400	 */
>    401	static int orangefs_file_mmap_prepare(struct vm_area_desc *desc)
>    402	{
>    403		struct file *file = desc->file;
>    404		int ret;
>    405
>    406		ret = orangefs_revalidate_mapping(file_inode(file));
>    407		if (ret)
>    408			return ret;
>    409
>    410		gossip_debug(GOSSIP_FILE_DEBUG,
>    411			     "orangefs_file_mmap: called on %pD\n", file);
>    412
>    413		/* set the sequential readahead hint */
>  > 414		vma_desc_set_flags(desc, VMA_SEQ_READ_BIT);

This is totally valid? vma_flags_set_mask() (which is ultimately invoked) uses
ACCESS_PRIVATE() consistently.

I wonder if mk_vma_flags() is an issue as it ultimately does (const vma_flag_t
[]){ VMA_SEQ_READ_BIT } here that then gets 'dereferenced' by array access in
__mk_vma_flags().

Nothing is accessing __vma_flags in vma_flags_t directly however, it's all via
ACCESS_PRIVATE() as far as I can tell?

>    415		vma_desc_clear_flags(desc, VMA_RAND_READ_BIT);
>    416
>    417		file_accessed(file);
>    418		desc->vm_ops = &orangefs_file_vm_ops;
>    419		return 0;
>    420	}
>    421
>
> --
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
> https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

Thanks, Lorenzo


  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-20 10:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-20  9:10 kernel test robot
2026-01-20 10:56 ` Lorenzo Stoakes [this message]
2026-01-20 12:11   ` Lorenzo Stoakes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=09bb7453-a2d7-45f4-a69a-ceddcf6fe809@lucifer.local \
    --to=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox