From: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
To: 'Oleg Nesterov' <oleg@redhat.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: 'Jiri Olsa' <olsajiri@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
"bpf@vger.kernel.org" <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH bpf-next 08/13] uprobes/x86: Add support to optimize uprobes
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 11:10:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0916e24539ba4bae9fb729198b033bd7@AcuMS.aculab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241216101258.GA374@redhat.com>
From: Oleg Nesterov
> Sent: 16 December 2024 10:13
>
> David,
>
> let me say first that my understanding of this magic is very limited,
> please correct me.
I only (half) understand what the 'magic' has to accomplish and
some of the pitfalls.
I've copied linux-mm - someone there might know more.
> On 12/16, David Laight wrote:
> >
> > It all depends on how hard __replace_page() tries to be atomic.
> > The page has to change from one backed by the executable to a private
> > one backed by swap - otherwise you can't write to it.
>
> This is what uprobe_write_opcode() does,
And will be enough for single byte changes - they'll be picked up
at some point after the change.
> > But the problems arise when the instruction prefetch unit has read
> > part of the 5-byte instruction (it might even only read half a cache
> > line at a time).
> > I'm not sure how long the pipeline can sit in that state - but I
> > can do a memory read of a PCIe address that takes ~3000 clocks.
> > (And a misaligned AVX-512 read is probably eight 8-byte transfers.)
> >
> > So I think you need to force an interrupt while the PTE is invalid.
> > And that need to be simultaneous on all cpu running that process.
>
> __replace_page() does ptep_get_and_clear(old_pte) + flush_tlb_page().
>
> That's not enough?
I doubt it. As I understand it.
The hardware page tables will be shared by all the threads of a process.
So unless you hard synchronise all the cpu (and flush the TLB) while the
PTE is being changed there is always the possibility of a cpu picking up
the new PTE before the IPI that (I presume) flush_tlb_page() generates
is processed.
If that happens when the instruction you are patching is part-read into
the instruction decode buffer then you'll execute a mismatch of the two
instructions.
I can't remember the outcome of discussions about live-patching kernel
code - and I'm sure that was aligned 32bit writes.
>
> > Stopping the process using ptrace would do it.
>
> Not an option :/
Thought you'd say that.
David
>
> Oleg.
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
next parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-16 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20241211133403.208920-1-jolsa@kernel.org>
[not found] ` <20241211133403.208920-9-jolsa@kernel.org>
[not found] ` <1521ff93bc0649b0aade9cfc444929ca@AcuMS.aculab.com>
[not found] ` <20241215141412.GA13580@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <Z1_gFymfO3sAwhiY@krava>
[not found] ` <c5fb22629d3f42798def5b63ce834801@AcuMS.aculab.com>
[not found] ` <20241216101258.GA374@redhat.com>
2024-12-16 11:10 ` David Laight [this message]
2024-12-16 12:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-12-16 12:50 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-12-16 15:08 ` David Laight
2024-12-16 16:06 ` Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0916e24539ba4bae9fb729198b033bd7@AcuMS.aculab.com \
--to=david.laight@aculab.com \
--cc=alan.maguire@oracle.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=olsajiri@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox