From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1A35C433E0 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 02:16:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DA8B2074B for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 02:16:32 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7DA8B2074B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id ECCC26B0008; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 22:16:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id E55756B000A; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 22:16:31 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id D45948D0001; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 22:16:31 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0023.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.23]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB5386B0008 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 22:16:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin05.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85139180AD817 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 02:16:31 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77093128182.05.stew03_561575c26f77 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64E461802184B for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 02:16:31 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: stew03_561575c26f77 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2466 Received: from out4436.biz.mail.alibaba.com (out4436.biz.mail.alibaba.com [47.88.44.36]) by imf26.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 02:16:30 +0000 (UTC) X-Alimail-AntiSpam:AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R401e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=e01f04397;MF=alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=19;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0U4C7kb-_1596075375; Received: from IT-FVFX43SYHV2H.local(mailfrom:alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0U4C7kb-_1596075375) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Thu, 30 Jul 2020 10:16:16 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 00/21] per memcg lru lock To: Hugh Dickins Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mgorman@techsingularity.net, tj@kernel.org, khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru, daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com, yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com, willy@infradead.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, lkp@intel.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, shakeelb@google.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, richard.weiyang@gmail.com, kirill@shutemov.name, alexander.duyck@gmail.com, rong.a.chen@intel.com References: <1595681998-19193-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> <49d4f3bf-ccce-3c97-3a4c-f5cefe2d623a@linux.alibaba.com> From: Alex Shi Message-ID: <08c8797d-1935-7b41-b8db-d22f054912ac@linux.alibaba.com> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 10:16:13 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gbk X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 64E461802184B X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 100.00] X-Rspamd-Server: rspam01 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: =D4=DA 2020/7/30 =C9=CF=CE=E72:06, Hugh Dickins =D0=B4=B5=C0: > On Wed, 29 Jul 2020, Alex Shi wrote: >> >> Is there any comments or suggestion for this patchset? >> Any hints will be very appreciated. >=20 > Alex: it is now v5.8-rc7, obviously too late for this patchset to make > v5.9, so I'm currently concentrated on checking some patches headed for > v5.9 (and some bugfix patches of my own that I don't get time to send): > I'll get back to responding on lru_lock in a week or two's time. Hi Hugh, Thanks a lot for response! It's fine to wait longer. But thing would be more efficient if review get concentrated... I am still too new in mm area. Thanks Alex