From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <08a601c28bbb$2f6182a0$760010ac@edumazet> From: "dada1" References: Subject: Re: [patch] remove hugetlb syscalls Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 09:52:33 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Rik van Riel , Benjamin LaHaise Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: I beg to differ. I already use the syscalls. The patch doesnt change Documentation/vm/hugetlbpage.txt How one is supposed to use hugetlbfs ? That's not documented. Before dropping support for syscalls, please change the Documentation. Thanks ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rik van Riel" To: "Benjamin LaHaise" Cc: "Andrew Morton" ; ; Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 1:42 AM Subject: Re: [patch] remove hugetlb syscalls > On Wed, 13 Nov 2002, Benjamin LaHaise wrote: > > > Since the functionality of the hugetlb syscalls is now available via > > hugetlbfs with better control over permissions, could you apply the > > following patch that gets rid of a lot of duplicate and unnescessary > > code by removing the two hugetlb syscalls? > > #include > > Yes, lets get rid of this ugliness before somebody actually > finds a way to use these syscalls... > > regards, > > Rik > -- > Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". > http://www.surriel.com/ http://guru.conectiva.com/ > Current spamtrap: october@surriel.com > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/