Re: [PATCH 1/4] mm/vmalloc: Remove unnecessary size ALIGN in __vmalloc_node_range_noprof

[liuye <liuye@kylinos.cn>]

在 2025/3/5 18:06, Uladzislau Rezki 写道:
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 06:02:19PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
>> On 03/05/25 at 09:46am, liuye wrote:
>>>
>>> 在 2025/3/4 02:30, Uladzislau Rezki 写道:
>>>> On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 05:44:07PM +0800, Liu Ye wrote:
>>>>> The same operation already exists in the function __get_vm_area_node,
>>>>> so delete the duplicate operation to simplify the code.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Liu Ye <liuye@kylinos.cn>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  mm/vmalloc.c | 1 -
>>>>>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
>>>>> index dc658d4af181..20d9b9de84b1 100644
>>>>> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
>>>>> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
>>>>> @@ -3798,7 +3798,6 @@ void *__vmalloc_node_range_noprof(unsigned long size, unsigned long align,
>>>>>  			shift = arch_vmap_pte_supported_shift(size);
>>>>>  
>>>>>  		align = max(real_align, 1UL << shift);
>>>>> -		size = ALIGN(real_size, 1UL << shift);
>>>>>  	}
>>>>>  
>>>>>  again:
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> 2.25.1
>>>>>
>>>> There is a mess with:
>>>>
>>>>  unsigned long real_size = size;
>>>>  unsigned long real_align = align;
>>>>
>>>> "real_size" and "real_align". Those are useless. What is about:
>>>
>>> Sorry, the order of the patches may be misleading.
>>>
>>> The correct order is as follows：
>>>
>>> PATCH1.  mm/vmalloc: Size should be used instead of real_size "
>>> PATCH2.  mm/vmalloc: Remove unnecessary size ALIGN in __vmalloc_node_range_noprof                 
>>> PATCH3.  mm/vmalloc: Remove the real_size variable to simplify the code "
>>> PATCH4.  mm/vmalloc: Rename the variable real_align to original_align to prevent misunderstanding
>>>
>>> If PATCH1 is the correct fix, then consider PATCH2, PATCH3, and PATCH4.
>>
>> Well, seems the patch split is done too subtly. It's only about the
>> size/align inside one function, maybe one patch is enough in this case.
>> My personal opinion.
>>
> I agree. One patch would be enough.
> 

At first, I only wanted to use one patch, but to better understand, I split it up.
I can integrate it later and resend a new patch, and add a detailed description in the commit message.

Thanks，
Liu Ye

> --
> Uladzislau Rezki