From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
Matthew WilCox <willy@infradead.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] mm/slub: refactor deactivate_slab()
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2022 17:40:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <07d4f687-544f-17d4-51cd-7b86aa23fb21@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220307074057.902222-3-42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
On 3/7/22 08:40, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
> Simplify deactivate_slab() by unlocking n->list_lock and retrying
> cmpxchg_double() when cmpxchg_double() fails, and perform
> add_{partial,full} only when it succeed.
>
> Releasing and taking n->list_lock again here is not harmful as SLUB
> avoids deactivating slabs as much as possible.
>
> [ vbabka@suse.cz: perform add_{partial,full} when cmpxchg_double()
> succeed.
>
> count deactivating full slabs even if debugging flag is not set. ]
>
> Signed-off-by: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
adding both to slab-next. Fixed up some nits myself, see below:
>
> @@ -2420,61 +2416,50 @@ static void deactivate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,
> new.frozen = 0;
>
> if (!new.inuse && n->nr_partial >= s->min_partial)
> - m = M_FREE;
> + mode = M_FREE;
> else if (new.freelist) {
This was against kernel style even before the patch - we use { } in the
'else if' branch, thus all branches should use { } even if one-line.
> - m = M_PARTIAL;
> - if (!lock) {
> - lock = 1;
> - /*
> - * Taking the spinlock removes the possibility that
> - * acquire_slab() will see a slab that is frozen
> - */
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&n->list_lock, flags);
> - }
> - } else {
> - m = M_FULL;
> - if (kmem_cache_debug_flags(s, SLAB_STORE_USER) && !lock) {
> - lock = 1;
> - /*
> - * This also ensures that the scanning of full
> - * slabs from diagnostic functions will not see
> - * any frozen slabs.
> - */
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&n->list_lock, flags);
> - }
> - }
> -
> - if (l != m) {
> - if (l == M_PARTIAL)
> - remove_partial(n, slab);
> - else if (l == M_FULL)
> - remove_full(s, n, slab);
> + mode = M_PARTIAL;
> + /*
> + * Taking the spinlock removes the possibility that
> + * acquire_slab() will see a slab that is frozen
> + */
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&n->list_lock, flags);
> + } else if (kmem_cache_debug_flags(s, SLAB_STORE_USER)) {
> + mode = M_FULL;
> + /*
> + * This also ensures that the scanning of full
> + * slabs from diagnostic functions will not see
> + * any frozen slabs.
> + */
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&n->list_lock, flags);
> + } else
> + mode = M_FULL_NOLIST;
Ditto here (this is new).
> - if (m == M_PARTIAL)
> - add_partial(n, slab, tail);
> - else if (m == M_FULL)
> - add_full(s, n, slab);
> - }
>
> - l = m;
> if (!cmpxchg_double_slab(s, slab,
> old.freelist, old.counters,
> new.freelist, new.counters,
> - "unfreezing slab"))
> + "unfreezing slab")) {
> + if (mode == M_PARTIAL || mode == M_FULL)
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags);
> goto redo;
> + }
>
> - if (lock)
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags);
>
> - if (m == M_PARTIAL)
> + if (mode == M_PARTIAL) {
> + add_partial(n, slab, tail);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags);
> stat(s, tail);
> - else if (m == M_FULL)
> - stat(s, DEACTIVATE_FULL);
> - else if (m == M_FREE) {
> + } else if (mode == M_FREE) {
> stat(s, DEACTIVATE_EMPTY);
> discard_slab(s, slab);
> stat(s, FREE_SLAB);
> - }
> + } else if (mode == M_FULL) {
> + add_full(s, n, slab);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags);
> + stat(s, DEACTIVATE_FULL);
> + } else if (mode == M_FULL_NOLIST)
> + stat(s, DEACTIVATE_FULL);
And here.
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-07 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-07 7:40 [PATCH v3 0/2] slab cleanups Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-03-07 7:40 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] mm/slub: limit number of node partial slabs only in cache creation Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-03-08 4:48 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-03-07 7:40 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] mm/slub: refactor deactivate_slab() Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-03-07 16:40 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2022-03-08 3:58 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-03-08 1:40 ` Xiongwei Song
2022-03-08 3:50 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-03-08 5:29 ` Xiongwei Song
2022-03-08 5:01 ` Roman Gushchin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=07d4f687-544f-17d4-51cd-7b86aa23fb21@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox