From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen/gntdev: fix up blockable calls to mn_invl_range_start
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 22:44:07 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <07c7ead4-334d-9b25-f588-25e9b46bbea0@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180823120707.10998-1-mhocko@kernel.org>
On 2018/08/23 21:07, Michal Hocko wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/gntdev.c b/drivers/xen/gntdev.c
> index 57390c7666e5..e7d8bb1bee2a 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/gntdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/gntdev.c
> @@ -519,21 +519,20 @@ static int mn_invl_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
> struct gntdev_grant_map *map;
> int ret = 0;
>
> - /* TODO do we really need a mutex here? */
> if (blockable)
> mutex_lock(&priv->lock);
> else if (!mutex_trylock(&priv->lock))
> return -EAGAIN;
>
> list_for_each_entry(map, &priv->maps, next) {
> - if (in_range(map, start, end)) {
> + if (!blockable && in_range(map, start, end)) {
This still looks strange. Prior to 93065ac753e4, in_range() test was
inside unmap_if_in_range(). But this patch removes in_range() test
if blockable == true. That is, unmap_if_in_range() will unconditionally
unmap if blockable == true, which seems to be an unexpected change.
> ret = -EAGAIN;
> goto out_unlock;
> }
> unmap_if_in_range(map, start, end);
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-23 13:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-23 12:07 Michal Hocko
2018-08-23 13:44 ` Tetsuo Handa [this message]
2018-08-23 13:51 ` Michal Hocko
2018-08-23 14:06 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2018-08-23 19:09 ` Michal Hocko
2018-08-24 5:03 ` Juergen Gross
2018-08-24 7:49 ` Michal Hocko
2018-08-23 14:20 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-08-23 13:46 ` Boris Ostrovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=07c7ead4-334d-9b25-f588-25e9b46bbea0@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--to=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox