linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen/gntdev: fix up blockable calls to mn_invl_range_start
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 22:44:07 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <07c7ead4-334d-9b25-f588-25e9b46bbea0@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180823120707.10998-1-mhocko@kernel.org>

On 2018/08/23 21:07, Michal Hocko wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/gntdev.c b/drivers/xen/gntdev.c
> index 57390c7666e5..e7d8bb1bee2a 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/gntdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/gntdev.c
> @@ -519,21 +519,20 @@ static int mn_invl_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
>  	struct gntdev_grant_map *map;
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
> -	/* TODO do we really need a mutex here? */
>  	if (blockable)
>  		mutex_lock(&priv->lock);
>  	else if (!mutex_trylock(&priv->lock))
>  		return -EAGAIN;
>  
>  	list_for_each_entry(map, &priv->maps, next) {
> -		if (in_range(map, start, end)) {
> +		if (!blockable && in_range(map, start, end)) {

This still looks strange. Prior to 93065ac753e4, in_range() test was
inside unmap_if_in_range(). But this patch removes in_range() test
if blockable == true. That is, unmap_if_in_range() will unconditionally
unmap if blockable == true, which seems to be an unexpected change.

>  			ret = -EAGAIN;
>  			goto out_unlock;
>  		}
>  		unmap_if_in_range(map, start, end);
>  	}

  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-23 13:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-23 12:07 Michal Hocko
2018-08-23 13:44 ` Tetsuo Handa [this message]
2018-08-23 13:51   ` Michal Hocko
2018-08-23 14:06     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2018-08-23 19:09       ` Michal Hocko
2018-08-24  5:03         ` Juergen Gross
2018-08-24  7:49           ` Michal Hocko
2018-08-23 14:20     ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-08-23 13:46 ` Boris Ostrovsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=07c7ead4-334d-9b25-f588-25e9b46bbea0@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --to=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox