From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] mm/slub: do not bypass memcg reclaim for high-order page allocation
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 22:02:18 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <077206b884045ae9d82fd603fddde51d2eb630b5.1440960578.git.vdavydov@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1440960578.git.vdavydov@parallels.com>
Commit 6af3142bed1f52 ("mm/slub: don't wait for high-order page
allocation") made allocate_slab() try to allocate high order slab pages
without __GFP_WAIT in order to avoid invoking reclaim/compaction when we
can fall back on low order pages. However, it broke memcg/memory.high
logic in case kmem accounting is enabled. The memory.high threshold
works as a soft limit: an allocation does not fail if it is breached,
but we call direct reclaim to compensate for the excess. Without
__GFP_WAIT we cannot invoke reclaimer and therefore we will go on
exceeding memory.high more and more until a normal __GFP_WAIT allocation
is issued.
Since memcg reclaim never triggers compaction, we can pass __GFP_WAIT to
memcg_charge_slab() even on high order page allocations w/o any
performance impact. So let us fix this problem by excluding __GFP_WAIT
only from alloc_pages() while still forwarding it to memcg_charge_slab()
if the context allows.
Reported-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>
---
mm/slub.c | 24 +++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index e180f8dcd06d..416a332277cb 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -1333,6 +1333,14 @@ static inline struct page *alloc_slab_page(struct kmem_cache *s,
if (memcg_charge_slab(s, flags, order))
return NULL;
+ /*
+ * Let the initial higher-order allocation fail under memory pressure
+ * so we fall-back to the minimum order allocation.
+ */
+ if (oo_order(oo) > oo_order(s->min))
+ flags = (flags | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC) &
+ ~(__GFP_NOFAIL | __GFP_WAIT);
+
if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE)
page = alloc_pages(flags, order);
else
@@ -1348,7 +1356,6 @@ static struct page *allocate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node)
{
struct page *page;
struct kmem_cache_order_objects oo = s->oo;
- gfp_t alloc_gfp;
void *start, *p;
int idx, order;
@@ -1359,23 +1366,14 @@ static struct page *allocate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node)
flags |= s->allocflags;
- /*
- * Let the initial higher-order allocation fail under memory pressure
- * so we fall-back to the minimum order allocation.
- */
- alloc_gfp = (flags | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_NORETRY) & ~__GFP_NOFAIL;
- if ((alloc_gfp & __GFP_WAIT) && oo_order(oo) > oo_order(s->min))
- alloc_gfp = (alloc_gfp | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC) & ~__GFP_WAIT;
-
- page = alloc_slab_page(s, alloc_gfp, node, oo);
+ page = alloc_slab_page(s, flags, node, oo);
if (unlikely(!page)) {
oo = s->min;
- alloc_gfp = flags;
/*
* Allocation may have failed due to fragmentation.
* Try a lower order alloc if possible
*/
- page = alloc_slab_page(s, alloc_gfp, node, oo);
+ page = alloc_slab_page(s, flags, node, oo);
if (unlikely(!page))
goto out;
stat(s, ORDER_FALLBACK);
@@ -1385,7 +1383,7 @@ static struct page *allocate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node)
!(s->flags & (SLAB_NOTRACK | DEBUG_DEFAULT_FLAGS))) {
int pages = 1 << oo_order(oo);
- kmemcheck_alloc_shadow(page, oo_order(oo), alloc_gfp, node);
+ kmemcheck_alloc_shadow(page, oo_order(oo), flags, node);
/*
* Objects from caches that have a constructor don't get
--
2.1.4
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-30 19:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-30 19:02 [PATCH 0/2] Fix memcg/memory.high in case kmem accounting is enabled Vladimir Davydov
2015-08-30 19:02 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm/slab: skip memcg reclaim only if in atomic context Vladimir Davydov
2015-08-30 19:02 ` Vladimir Davydov [this message]
2015-08-31 13:24 ` [PATCH 0/2] Fix memcg/memory.high in case kmem accounting is enabled Michal Hocko
2015-08-31 13:43 ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-31 14:30 ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-08-31 14:39 ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-31 15:18 ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-08-31 15:47 ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-31 16:51 ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-08-31 17:03 ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-31 19:26 ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-08-31 20:22 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-09-01 9:25 ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-08-31 14:20 ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-08-31 14:46 ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-31 15:24 ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-09-01 12:36 ` Michal Hocko
2015-09-01 13:40 ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-09-01 15:01 ` Michal Hocko
2015-09-01 16:55 ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-09-01 18:38 ` Michal Hocko
2015-09-02 9:30 ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-09-02 18:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-09-03 9:36 ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-09-03 16:32 ` Tejun Heo
2015-09-04 11:15 ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-09-04 15:44 ` Tejun Heo
2015-09-04 18:21 ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-09-04 19:30 ` Tejun Heo
2015-09-04 14:38 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=077206b884045ae9d82fd603fddde51d2eb630b5.1440960578.git.vdavydov@parallels.com \
--to=vdavydov@parallels.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox