From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
To: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] powerpc/mm: support nested lazy_mmu sections
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2025 17:52:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <074ff6ab-5868-4fde-b5bb-9e17632ad817-agordeev@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250904125736.3918646-6-kevin.brodsky@arm.com>
On Thu, Sep 04, 2025 at 01:57:34PM +0100, Kevin Brodsky wrote:
...
> static inline lazy_mmu_state_t arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode(void)
> {
> struct ppc64_tlb_batch *batch;
> + int lazy_mmu_nested;
>
> if (radix_enabled())
> return LAZY_MMU_DEFAULT;
> @@ -39,9 +40,14 @@ static inline lazy_mmu_state_t arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode(void)
> */
> preempt_disable();
> batch = this_cpu_ptr(&ppc64_tlb_batch);
> - batch->active = 1;
> + lazy_mmu_nested = batch->active;
>
> - return LAZY_MMU_DEFAULT;
> + if (!lazy_mmu_nested) {
Why not just?
if (!batch->active) {
> + batch->active = 1;
> + return LAZY_MMU_DEFAULT;
> + } else {
> + return LAZY_MMU_NESTED;
> + }
> }
>
> static inline void arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode(lazy_mmu_state_t state)
> @@ -54,7 +60,10 @@ static inline void arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode(lazy_mmu_state_t state)
>
> if (batch->index)
> __flush_tlb_pending(batch);
> - batch->active = 0;
> +
> + if (state != LAZY_MMU_NESTED)
> + batch->active = 0;
> +
> preempt_enable();
> }
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-05 15:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-04 12:57 [PATCH 0/7] Nesting support for lazy MMU mode Kevin Brodsky
2025-09-04 12:57 ` [PATCH 1/7] mm: remove arch_flush_lazy_mmu_mode() Kevin Brodsky
2025-09-05 11:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-09-04 12:57 ` [PATCH 2/7] mm: introduce local state for lazy_mmu sections Kevin Brodsky
2025-09-04 15:06 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-09-04 15:47 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-09-04 17:28 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-09-04 22:14 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-09-05 11:21 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-09-05 11:37 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-09-05 12:22 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-09-05 11:19 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-09-04 12:57 ` [PATCH 3/7] arm64: mm: fully support nested " Kevin Brodsky
2025-09-04 12:57 ` [PATCH 4/7] x86/xen: support nested lazy_mmu sections (again) Kevin Brodsky
2025-09-05 15:48 ` Alexander Gordeev
2025-09-08 7:32 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-09-04 12:57 ` [PATCH 5/7] powerpc/mm: support nested lazy_mmu sections Kevin Brodsky
2025-09-05 15:52 ` Alexander Gordeev [this message]
2025-09-08 7:32 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-09-04 12:57 ` [PATCH 6/7] sparc/mm: " Kevin Brodsky
2025-09-04 12:57 ` [PATCH 7/7] mm: update lazy_mmu documentation Kevin Brodsky
2025-09-05 11:13 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-09-05 9:46 ` [PATCH 0/7] Nesting support for lazy MMU mode Alexander Gordeev
2025-09-05 12:11 ` Kevin Brodsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=074ff6ab-5868-4fde-b5bb-9e17632ad817-agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--to=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreas@gaisler.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox