From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Lin Feng <linf@wangsu.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
mgorman@techsingularity.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] init/main: fix broken buffer_init when DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT set
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 16:20:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <06a3d903-1f27-16c5-b45b-92ec56a47e96@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201123110500.103523-1-linf@wangsu.com>
On 11/23/20 12:05 PM, Lin Feng wrote:
> In the booting phase if CONFIG_DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT is set,
> we have following callchain:
>
> start_kernel
> ...
> mm_init
> mem_init
> memblock_free_all
> reset_all_zones_managed_pages
> free_low_memory_core_early
> ...
> buffer_init
> nr_free_buffer_pages
> zone->managed_pages
> ...
> rest_init
> kernel_init
> kernel_init_freeable
> page_alloc_init_late
> kthread_run(deferred_init_memmap, NODE_DATA(nid), "pgdatinit%d", nid);
> wait_for_completion(&pgdat_init_all_done_comp);
> ...
> files_maxfiles_init
>
> It's clear that buffer_init depends on zone->managed_pages, but it's reset
> in reset_all_zones_managed_pages after that pages are readded into
> zone->managed_pages, but when buffer_init runs this process is half done
> and most of them will finally be added till deferred_init_memmap done.
> In large memory couting of nr_free_buffer_pages drifts too much, also
> drifting from kernels to kernels on same hardware.
>
> Fix is simple, it delays buffer_init run till deferred_init_memmap all done.
Hmm nobody should need bh_cachep to allocate buffer heads until then, right.
> But as corrected by this patch, max_buffer_heads becomes very large,
> the value is roughly as many as 4 times of totalram_pages, formula:
> max_buffer_heads = nrpages * (10%) * (PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(struct buffer_head));
>
> Say in a 64GB memory box we have 16777216 pages, then max_buffer_heads
> turns out to be roughly 67,108,864.
> In common cases, should a buffer_head be mapped to one page/block(4KB)?
> So max_buffer_heads never exceeds totalram_pages.
> IMO it's likely to make buffer_heads_over_limit bool value alwasy false,
> then make codes 'if (buffer_heads_over_limit)' test in vmscan unnecessary.
> Correct me if it's not true.
Maybe we could compile that out with CONFIG_HIGHMEM then?
> So this patch will change the original behavior related to
> buffer_heads_over_limit in vmscan since we used a half done value
> of zone->managed_pages before, or should we use a smaller factor(<10%) in
> previous formula.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lin Feng <linf@wangsu.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> ---
> init/main.c | 2 --
> mm/page_alloc.c | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c
> index 20baced721ad..a3f7c3416286 100644
> --- a/init/main.c
> +++ b/init/main.c
> @@ -58,7 +58,6 @@
> #include <linux/rmap.h>
> #include <linux/mempolicy.h>
> #include <linux/key.h>
> -#include <linux/buffer_head.h>
> #include <linux/page_ext.h>
> #include <linux/debug_locks.h>
> #include <linux/debugobjects.h>
> @@ -1034,7 +1033,6 @@ asmlinkage __visible void __init __no_sanitize_address start_kernel(void)
> fork_init();
> proc_caches_init();
> uts_ns_init();
> - buffer_init();
> key_init();
> security_init();
> dbg_late_init();
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index eaa227a479e4..2931d706fb52 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -70,6 +70,7 @@
> #include <linux/psi.h>
> #include <linux/padata.h>
> #include <linux/khugepaged.h>
> +#include <linux/buffer_head.h>
>
> #include <asm/sections.h>
> #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
> @@ -2103,6 +2104,8 @@ void __init page_alloc_init_late(void)
> files_maxfiles_init();
> #endif
>
> + buffer_init();
> +
> /* Discard memblock private memory */
> memblock_discard();
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-25 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-23 11:05 Lin Feng
2020-11-23 20:04 ` Andrew Morton
2020-11-25 15:20 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=06a3d903-1f27-16c5-b45b-92ec56a47e96@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linf@wangsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox