From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm/slub: remove full list manipulation for non-debug slab
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 09:45:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <05e23c85-1bae-48a5-b1d1-cb61e0b1efdf@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240117-slab-misc-v1-2-fd1c49ccbe70@bytedance.com>
On 1/17/24 12:45, Chengming Zhou wrote:
> Since debug slab is processed by free_to_partial_list(), and only debug
> slab which has SLAB_STORE_USER flag would care about the full list, we
> can remove these unrelated full list manipulations from __slab_free().
Well spotted.
> Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> ---
> mm/slub.c | 4 ----
> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index 20c03555c97b..f0307e8b4cd2 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -4187,7 +4187,6 @@ static void __slab_free(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,
> * then add it.
> */
> if (!kmem_cache_has_cpu_partial(s) && unlikely(!prior)) {
> - remove_full(s, n, slab);
> add_partial(n, slab, DEACTIVATE_TO_TAIL);
> stat(s, FREE_ADD_PARTIAL);
> }
> @@ -4201,9 +4200,6 @@ static void __slab_free(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,
> */
> remove_partial(n, slab);
> stat(s, FREE_REMOVE_PARTIAL);
> - } else {
> - /* Slab must be on the full list */
> - remove_full(s, n, slab);
> }
>
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-23 8:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-17 11:45 [PATCH 0/3] mm/slub: some minor optimization and cleanup Chengming Zhou
2024-01-17 11:45 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm/slub: directly load freelist from cpu partial slab in the likely case Chengming Zhou
2024-01-17 22:41 ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2024-01-18 11:37 ` Chengming Zhou
2024-01-18 22:14 ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2024-01-19 3:53 ` Chengming Zhou
2024-01-22 17:13 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-01-23 2:51 ` Chengming Zhou
2024-01-23 7:42 ` Chengming Zhou
2024-01-23 8:24 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-01-23 9:17 ` Chengming Zhou
2024-01-17 11:45 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm/slub: remove full list manipulation for non-debug slab Chengming Zhou
2024-01-17 22:44 ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2024-01-23 8:45 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2024-01-17 11:46 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm/slub: remove unused parameter in next_freelist_entry() Chengming Zhou
2024-01-23 8:47 ` Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=05e23c85-1bae-48a5-b1d1-cb61e0b1efdf@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=zhouchengming@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox