From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40EB1C433E0 for ; Tue, 26 May 2020 06:40:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B75420899 for ; Tue, 26 May 2020 06:40:53 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0B75420899 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 7C75E80082; Tue, 26 May 2020 02:40:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 750A080061; Tue, 26 May 2020 02:40:53 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 640C780082; Tue, 26 May 2020 02:40:53 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0081.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.81]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46FE580061 for ; Tue, 26 May 2020 02:40:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin01.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A0522471 for ; Tue, 26 May 2020 06:40:53 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76857922386.01.uncle64_24b77e7c1531e X-HE-Tag: uncle64_24b77e7c1531e X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2685 Received: from huawei.com (szxga05-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.191]) by imf47.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 26 May 2020 06:40:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from DGGEMS412-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 43581B913C77D32BEFE4; Tue, 26 May 2020 14:40:48 +0800 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.173.220.25) by DGGEMS412-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.212) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Tue, 26 May 2020 14:40:40 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] arm64: Detect the ARMv8.4 TTL feature To: Anshuman Khandual , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , CC: , , , , , , , , References: <20200525125300.794-1-yezhenyu2@huawei.com> <20200525125300.794-2-yezhenyu2@huawei.com> From: Zhenyu Ye Message-ID: <050b7ee6-c7aa-5d61-4dff-4792a411464e@huawei.com> Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 14:40:38 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.173.220.25] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Hi Anshuman, On 2020/5/26 10:39, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > This patch (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11557359/) is adding some > more ID_AA64MMFR2 features including the TTL. I am going to respin parts > of the V4 series patches along with the above mentioned patch. So please > rebase this series accordingly, probably on latest next. > I noticed that some patches of your series have been merged into arm64 tree (for-next/cpufeature), such as TLB range, but this one not. Why? BTW, this patch is provided by Marc in his NV series [1], maybe you should also let him know. I will rebase my series after your patch is merged. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/d6032191-ba0e-82a4-4dde-11beef369a11@arm.com/ Thanks, Zhenyu