From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Ge Yang <yangge1116@126.com>, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org, 21cnbao@gmail.com,
baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, muchun.song@linux.dev,
osalvador@suse.de, liuzixing@hygon.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/hugetlb: wait for hugepage folios to be freed
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 10:41:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <048ca765-bf44-46ab-87d4-328dc0979159@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <406c6713-356b-4acf-bcd0-e5a6c1e9adcf@126.com>
On 18.02.25 10:22, Ge Yang wrote:
>
>
> 在 2025/2/18 16:55, David Hildenbrand 写道:
>> On 15.02.25 06:50, Ge Yang wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> 在 2025/2/14 16:08, David Hildenbrand 写道:
>>>> On 14.02.25 07:32, yangge1116@126.com wrote:
>>>>> From: Ge Yang <yangge1116@126.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Since the introduction of commit b65d4adbc0f0 ("mm: hugetlb: defer
>>>>> freeing
>>>>> of HugeTLB pages"), which supports deferring the freeing of HugeTLB
>>>>> pages,
>>>>> the allocation of contiguous memory through cma_alloc() may fail
>>>>> probabilistically.
>>>>>
>>>>> In the CMA allocation process, if it is found that the CMA area is
>>>>> occupied
>>>>> by in-use hugepage folios, these in-use hugepage folios need to be
>>>>> migrated
>>>>> to another location. When there are no available hugepage folios in the
>>>>> free HugeTLB pool during the migration of in-use HugeTLB pages, new
>>>>> folios
>>>>> are allocated from the buddy system. A temporary state is set on the
>>>>> newly
>>>>> allocated folio. Upon completion of the hugepage folio migration, the
>>>>> temporary state is transferred from the new folios to the old folios.
>>>>> Normally, when the old folios with the temporary state are freed, it is
>>>>> directly released back to the buddy system. However, due to the
>>>>> deferred
>>>>> freeing of HugeTLB pages, the PageBuddy() check fails, ultimately
>>>>> leading
>>>>> to the failure of cma_alloc().
>>>>>
>>>>> Here is a simplified call trace illustrating the process:
>>>>> cma_alloc()
>>>>> ->__alloc_contig_migrate_range() // Migrate in-use hugepage
>>>>> ->unmap_and_move_huge_page()
>>>>> ->folio_putback_hugetlb() // Free old folios
>>>>> ->test_pages_isolated()
>>>>> ->__test_page_isolated_in_pageblock()
>>>>> ->PageBuddy(page) // Check if the page is in buddy
>>>>>
>>>>> To resolve this issue, we have implemented a function named
>>>>> wait_for_hugepage_folios_freed(). This function ensures that the
>>>>> hugepage
>>>>> folios are properly released back to the buddy system after their
>>>>> migration
>>>>> is completed. By invoking wait_for_hugepage_folios_freed() following
>>>>> the
>>>>> migration process, we guarantee that when test_pages_isolated() is
>>>>> executed, it will successfully pass.
>>>>
>>>> Okay, so after every successful migration -> put of src, we wait for the
>>>> src to actually get freed.
>>>>
>>>> When migrating multiple hugetlb folios, we'd wait once per folio.
>>>>
>>>> It reminds me a bit about pcp caches, where folios are !buddy until the
>>>> pcp was drained.
>>>>
>>> It seems that we only track unmovable, reclaimable, and movable pages on
>>> the pcp lists. For specific details, please refer to the
>>> free_frozen_pages() function.
>>
>> It reminded me about PCP caches, because we effectively also have to
>> wait for some stuck folios to properly get freed to the buddy.
>>
> It seems that when an isolated page is freed, it won't be placed back
> into the PCP caches.
I recall there are cases when the page was in the pcp before the
isolation started, which is why we drain the pcp at some point (IIRC).
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-18 9:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-14 6:32 yangge1116
2025-02-14 8:08 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-02-15 5:50 ` Ge Yang
2025-02-18 8:55 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-02-18 9:22 ` Ge Yang
2025-02-18 9:41 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2025-02-18 9:54 ` Ge Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=048ca765-bf44-46ab-87d4-328dc0979159@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=liuzixing@hygon.cn \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yangge1116@126.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox