From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F99FC433E0 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 05:03:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B73223138 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 05:03:53 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6B73223138 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 2EA708D000E; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 00:03:52 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 270508D0007; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 00:03:52 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 185978D000E; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 00:03:52 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0229.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.229]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03F8C8D0007 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 00:03:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin07.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9E368245571 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 05:03:51 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77699559462.07.crush99_14054382751b Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D84A1803F920 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 05:03:51 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: crush99_14054382751b X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 3782 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by imf12.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 05:03:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 727961042; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 21:03:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.130] (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2E6A73F70D; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 21:03:45 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] mm/hotplug: Prevalidate the address range being added with platform To: David Hildenbrand , Oscar Salvador Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, hca@linux.ibm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vasily Gorbik , Will Deacon , Ard Biesheuvel , Mark Rutland References: <1608218912-28932-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> <1608218912-28932-2-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> <10e733fa-4568-d38f-9b95-2ccc5dc627b8@redhat.com> <20210111134303.GA3031@linux> <556a8a62-7bb2-d16b-67ea-57c87c1a6aa7@redhat.com> From: Anshuman Khandual Message-ID: <041d9344-b07c-c6f9-c41a-01057470c350@arm.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 10:34:04 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <556a8a62-7bb2-d16b-67ea-57c87c1a6aa7@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 1/12/21 3:39 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 12.01.21 04:51, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >> >> >> On 1/11/21 7:13 PM, Oscar Salvador wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 11:51:47AM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote: >>>> AFAIKs, all memhp_get_pluggable_range() users pass "1". >>>> >>>> What about the "add_pages()-only" path? >>> >>> I guess you refer to memremap_pages(), right? >> >> Right, via pagemap_range(). >> >>> If so, moving the added memhp_range_allowed() check above the if-else might do >>> the trick >>> >> We had that code in the earlier version. But dropped it, as we did >> not want to add any new checks in the generic code. Can add it back >> if that is preferred. > > I remember discussing replacing the check in __add_pages() instead. But The proposed change for __add_pages() now seems misleading. Instead of VM_BUG_ON(), memhp_range_allowed() should be checked directly for a non linear mapping i.e with 'false' argument and return prematurely in case that check fails. s/VM_BUG_ON(!memhp_range_allowed(.., 1)/!memhp_range_allowed(.., 0)/ /* * Reasonably generic function for adding memory. It is * expected that archs that support memory hotplug will @@ -317,10 +304,7 @@ int __ref __add_pages(int nid, unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages, if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!params->pgprot.pgprot)) return -EINVAL; - err = check_hotplug_memory_addressable(pfn, nr_pages); - if (err) - return err; - + VM_BUG_ON(!memhp_range_allowed(PFN_PHYS(pfn), nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE, 1)); if (altmap) { /* * Validate altmap is within bounds of the total request @@ -1181,6 +1165,61 @@ int add_memory_driver_managed(int nid, u64 start, u64 size, > I don't really care where the check ends up being. As discussed, at some > point, we should provide versions of add_pages() and arch_add_pages() > that don't immediately end in arch-code. Sure. But for now, AFAICS the above replacement should be sufficient.