Re: [PATCH v2 02/12] mm/mglru: rename variables related to aging and rotation

[Chen Ridong <chenridong@huaweicloud.com>]

On 2026/3/29 3:52, Kairui Song via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
> 
> The current variable name isn't helpful. Make the variable names more
> meaningful.
> 
> Only naming change, no behavior change.
> 
> Suggested-by: Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
> ---
>  mm/vmscan.c | 14 +++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index adc07501a137..f336f89a2de6 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -4934,7 +4934,7 @@ static bool should_run_aging(struct lruvec *lruvec, unsigned long max_seq,
>   */
>  static long get_nr_to_scan(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc, int swappiness)
>  {
> -	bool success;
> +	bool need_aging;
>  	unsigned long nr_to_scan;
>  	struct mem_cgroup *memcg = lruvec_memcg(lruvec);
>  	DEFINE_MAX_SEQ(lruvec);
> @@ -4942,7 +4942,7 @@ static long get_nr_to_scan(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc, int s
>  	if (mem_cgroup_below_min(sc->target_mem_cgroup, memcg))
>  		return -1;
>  
> -	success = should_run_aging(lruvec, max_seq, swappiness, &nr_to_scan);
> +	need_aging = should_run_aging(lruvec, max_seq, swappiness, &nr_to_scan);
>  
>  	/* try to scrape all its memory if this memcg was deleted */
>  	if (nr_to_scan && !mem_cgroup_online(memcg))
> @@ -4951,7 +4951,7 @@ static long get_nr_to_scan(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc, int s
>  	nr_to_scan = apply_proportional_protection(memcg, sc, nr_to_scan);
>  
>  	/* try to get away with not aging at the default priority */
> -	if (!success || sc->priority == DEF_PRIORITY)
> +	if (!need_aging || sc->priority == DEF_PRIORITY)
>  		return nr_to_scan >> sc->priority;
>  
>  	/* stop scanning this lruvec as it's low on cold folios */
> @@ -5040,7 +5040,7 @@ static bool try_to_shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
>  
>  static int shrink_one(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
>  {
> -	bool success;
> +	bool need_rotate;
>  	unsigned long scanned = sc->nr_scanned;
>  	unsigned long reclaimed = sc->nr_reclaimed;
>  	struct mem_cgroup *memcg = lruvec_memcg(lruvec);
> @@ -5058,7 +5058,7 @@ static int shrink_one(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
>  		memcg_memory_event(memcg, MEMCG_LOW);
>  	}
>  
> -	success = try_to_shrink_lruvec(lruvec, sc);
> +	need_rotate = try_to_shrink_lruvec(lruvec, sc);
>  
>  	shrink_slab(sc->gfp_mask, pgdat->node_id, memcg, sc->priority);
>  
> @@ -5068,10 +5068,10 @@ static int shrink_one(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
>  
>  	flush_reclaim_state(sc);
>  
> -	if (success && mem_cgroup_online(memcg))
> +	if (need_rotate && mem_cgroup_online(memcg))
>  		return MEMCG_LRU_YOUNG;
>  
> -	if (!success && lruvec_is_sizable(lruvec, sc))
> +	if (!need_rotate && lruvec_is_sizable(lruvec, sc))
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	/* one retry if offlined or too small */
> 

Reviewed-by: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huaweicloud.com>

-- 
Best regards,
Ridong