From: Scott Kaplan <sfkaplan@cs.amherst.edu>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Avoiding the highmem mess
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 17:54:09 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0334AD85-BC63-11D6-B00B-000393829FA4@cs.amherst.edu> (raw)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Folks,
As I've mentioned before, I'm trying to do some basic experiments using
the Linux VM. Part of doing these experiments will involve reverting the
kernel to a more ``classic'' kind of structure: A SEGQ layout where the
active pages are managed by a CLOCK algorithm, and the inactive pages are
kept in an LRU queue and are marked ``not present'' so that references to
them generate a trap. Critically, I don't aim to produce a kernel that
will work on non-x86 platforms, let alone NUMA machines or even (at least
initially) multiprocessor machines. I want to do some experiments where
the heart of the matter lies in testing single-processor management.
(Back to basics!)
SO! To that end, I'd like to avoid the ZONE_HIGHMEM mess. It seems oddly
done, and creates new kinds of contention between pools of pages that I
don't want polluting my experiments. (That's not to say that I don't
think it's a problem worth solving -- it's just not *the* problem that *I*
want to examine just yet.)
Is there an easy way to avoid ZONE_HIGHMEM? Is it as easy as avoiding
machines that have more than 1 GB of physical memory so that only
ZONE_NORMAL is used? I'd be happy to just use ZONE_NORMAL (and ZONE_DMA,
which I'm not all that worried about here) and have my experimental code
fail to support machines with more than 1 GB. Later I may want to fix
that, but I need to start with something simple and comprehensible.
Tips? Feedback? Your commentary is greatly appreciated...
Scott
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (Darwin)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE9b+mE8eFdWQtoOmgRAtVbAJ45HVBGz6BsDAEaoMQ8sDPSIIUtlACgjNFX
V7wxeT5NNPfS4KDmlqJbsIM=
=B0NR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/
next reply other threads:[~2002-08-30 21:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-30 21:54 Scott Kaplan [this message]
2002-08-30 21:59 ` Andrew Morton
2002-08-30 22:05 ` William Lee Irwin III
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0334AD85-BC63-11D6-B00B-000393829FA4@cs.amherst.edu \
--to=sfkaplan@cs.amherst.edu \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox