[RFC v3 1/3] fadump: Refactor and prepare fadump_cma_init for late init

[RFC v3 1/3] fadump: Refactor and prepare fadump_cma_init for late init

[Ritesh Harjani (IBM)]

We anyway don't use any return values from fadump_cma_init(). Since
fadump_reserve_mem() from where fadump_cma_init() gets called today,
already has the required checks.
This patch makes this function return type as void. Let's also handle
extra cases like return if fadump_supported is false or dump_active, so
that in later patches we can call fadump_cma_init() separately from
setup_arch().

Acked-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
---
v2 -> v3: Separated the series into 2 as discussed in v2.
[v2]: https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/cover.1728585512.git.ritesh.list@gmail.com/

 arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c | 23 +++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c
index a612e7513a4f..162327d66982 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c
@@ -78,27 +78,23 @@ static struct cma *fadump_cma;
  * But for some reason even if it fails we still have the memory reservation
  * with us and we can still continue doing fadump.
  */
-static int __init fadump_cma_init(void)
+static void __init fadump_cma_init(void)
 {
 	unsigned long long base, size;
 	int rc;

-	if (!fw_dump.fadump_enabled)
-		return 0;
-
+	if (!fw_dump.fadump_supported || !fw_dump.fadump_enabled ||
+			fw_dump.dump_active)
+		return;
 	/*
 	 * Do not use CMA if user has provided fadump=nocma kernel parameter.
-	 * Return 1 to continue with fadump old behaviour.
 	 */
-	if (fw_dump.nocma)
-		return 1;
+	if (fw_dump.nocma || !fw_dump.boot_memory_size)
+		return;

 	base = fw_dump.reserve_dump_area_start;
 	size = fw_dump.boot_memory_size;

-	if (!size)
-		return 0;
-
 	rc = cma_init_reserved_mem(base, size, 0, "fadump_cma", &fadump_cma);
 	if (rc) {
 		pr_err("Failed to init cma area for firmware-assisted dump,%d\n", rc);
@@ -108,7 +104,7 @@ static int __init fadump_cma_init(void)
 		 * blocked from production system usage.  Hence return 1,
 		 * so that we can continue with fadump.
 		 */
-		return 1;
+		return;
 	}

 	/*
@@ -125,10 +121,9 @@ static int __init fadump_cma_init(void)
 		cma_get_size(fadump_cma),
 		(unsigned long)cma_get_base(fadump_cma) >> 20,
 		fw_dump.reserve_dump_area_size);
-	return 1;
 }
 #else
-static int __init fadump_cma_init(void) { return 1; }
+static void __init fadump_cma_init(void) { }
 #endif /* CONFIG_CMA */

 /*
@@ -638,7 +633,7 @@ int __init fadump_reserve_mem(void)
 		pr_info("Reserved %lldMB of memory at %#016llx (System RAM: %lldMB)\n",
 			(size >> 20), base, (memblock_phys_mem_size() >> 20));

-		ret = fadump_cma_init();
+		fadump_cma_init();
 	}

 	return ret;
--
2.46.0

[RFC v3 2/3] fadump: Reserve page-aligned boot_memory_size during fadump_reserve_mem

[Ritesh Harjani (IBM)]

This patch refactors all CMA related initialization and alignment code
to within fadump_cma_init() which gets called in the end. This also means
that we keep [reserve_dump_area_start, boot_memory_size] page aligned
during fadump_reserve_mem(). Then later in fadump_cma_init() we extract the
aligned chunk and provide it to CMA. This inherently also fixes an issue in
the current code where the reserve_dump_area_start is not aligned
when the physical memory can have holes and the suitable chunk starts at
an unaligned boundary.

After this we should be able to call fadump_cma_init() independently
later in setup_arch() where pageblock_order is non-zero.

Suggested-by: Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c
index 162327d66982..ffaec625b7a8 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static struct cma *fadump_cma;
  */
 static void __init fadump_cma_init(void)
 {
-	unsigned long long base, size;
+	unsigned long long base, size, end;
 	int rc;
 
 	if (!fw_dump.fadump_supported || !fw_dump.fadump_enabled ||
@@ -92,8 +92,24 @@ static void __init fadump_cma_init(void)
 	if (fw_dump.nocma || !fw_dump.boot_memory_size)
 		return;
 
+	/*
+	 * [base, end) should be reserved during early init in
+	 * fadump_reserve_mem(). No need to check this here as
+	 * cma_init_reserved_mem() already checks for overlap.
+	 * Here we give the aligned chunk of this reserved memory to CMA.
+	 */
 	base = fw_dump.reserve_dump_area_start;
 	size = fw_dump.boot_memory_size;
+	end = base + size;
+
+	base = ALIGN(base, CMA_MIN_ALIGNMENT_BYTES);
+	end = ALIGN_DOWN(end, CMA_MIN_ALIGNMENT_BYTES);
+	size = end - base;
+
+	if (end <= base) {
+		pr_warn("%s: Too less memory to give to CMA\n", __func__);
+		return;
+	}
 
 	rc = cma_init_reserved_mem(base, size, 0, "fadump_cma", &fadump_cma);
 	if (rc) {
@@ -116,11 +132,12 @@ static void __init fadump_cma_init(void)
 	/*
 	 * So we now have successfully initialized cma area for fadump.
 	 */
-	pr_info("Initialized 0x%lx bytes cma area at %ldMB from 0x%lx "
+	pr_info("Initialized [0x%llx, %luMB] cma area from [0x%lx, %luMB] "
 		"bytes of memory reserved for firmware-assisted dump\n",
-		cma_get_size(fadump_cma),
-		(unsigned long)cma_get_base(fadump_cma) >> 20,
-		fw_dump.reserve_dump_area_size);
+		cma_get_base(fadump_cma), cma_get_size(fadump_cma) >> 20,
+		fw_dump.reserve_dump_area_start,
+		fw_dump.boot_memory_size >> 20);
+	return;
 }
 #else
 static void __init fadump_cma_init(void) { }
@@ -553,13 +570,6 @@ int __init fadump_reserve_mem(void)
 	if (!fw_dump.dump_active) {
 		fw_dump.boot_memory_size =
 			PAGE_ALIGN(fadump_calculate_reserve_size());
-#ifdef CONFIG_CMA
-		if (!fw_dump.nocma) {
-			fw_dump.boot_memory_size =
-				ALIGN(fw_dump.boot_memory_size,
-				      CMA_MIN_ALIGNMENT_BYTES);
-		}
-#endif
 
 		bootmem_min = fw_dump.ops->fadump_get_bootmem_min();
 		if (fw_dump.boot_memory_size < bootmem_min) {
-- 
2.46.0

Re: [RFC v3 2/3] fadump: Reserve page-aligned boot_memory_size during fadump_reserve_mem

[Madhavan Srinivasan]

On 10/11/24 8:30 PM, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) wrote:
> This patch refactors all CMA related initialization and alignment code
> to within fadump_cma_init() which gets called in the end. This also means
> that we keep [reserve_dump_area_start, boot_memory_size] page aligned
> during fadump_reserve_mem(). Then later in fadump_cma_init() we extract the
> aligned chunk and provide it to CMA. This inherently also fixes an issue in
> the current code where the reserve_dump_area_start is not aligned
> when the physical memory can have holes and the suitable chunk starts at
> an unaligned boundary.
> 
> After this we should be able to call fadump_cma_init() independently
> later in setup_arch() where pageblock_order is non-zero.
> 
> Suggested-by: Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com>
> Acked-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c
> index 162327d66982..ffaec625b7a8 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c
> @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static struct cma *fadump_cma;
>   */
>  static void __init fadump_cma_init(void)
>  {
> -	unsigned long long base, size;
> +	unsigned long long base, size, end;
>  	int rc;
>  
>  	if (!fw_dump.fadump_supported || !fw_dump.fadump_enabled ||
> @@ -92,8 +92,24 @@ static void __init fadump_cma_init(void)
>  	if (fw_dump.nocma || !fw_dump.boot_memory_size)
>  		return;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * [base, end) should be reserved during early init in
> +	 * fadump_reserve_mem(). No need to check this here as
> +	 * cma_init_reserved_mem() already checks for overlap.
> +	 * Here we give the aligned chunk of this reserved memory to CMA.
> +	 */
>  	base = fw_dump.reserve_dump_area_start;
>  	size = fw_dump.boot_memory_size;
> +	end = base + size;
> +
> +	base = ALIGN(base, CMA_MIN_ALIGNMENT_BYTES);
> +	end = ALIGN_DOWN(end, CMA_MIN_ALIGNMENT_BYTES);
> +	size = end - base;
> +
> +	if (end <= base) {
> +		pr_warn("%s: Too less memory to give to CMA\n", __func__);
> +		return;
> +	}
>  

just minor, other prints are all "cma", any reason for "CMA" here?


>  	rc = cma_init_reserved_mem(base, size, 0, "fadump_cma", &fadump_cma);
>  	if (rc) {
> @@ -116,11 +132,12 @@ static void __init fadump_cma_init(void)
>  	/*
>  	 * So we now have successfully initialized cma area for fadump.
>  	 */
> -	pr_info("Initialized 0x%lx bytes cma area at %ldMB from 0x%lx "
> +	pr_info("Initialized [0x%llx, %luMB] cma area from [0x%lx, %luMB] "
>  		"bytes of memory reserved for firmware-assisted dump\n",
> -		cma_get_size(fadump_cma),
> -		(unsigned long)cma_get_base(fadump_cma) >> 20,
> -		fw_dump.reserve_dump_area_size);
> +		cma_get_base(fadump_cma), cma_get_size(fadump_cma) >> 20,
> +		fw_dump.reserve_dump_area_start,
> +		fw_dump.boot_memory_size >> 20);
> +	return;
>  }
>  #else
>  static void __init fadump_cma_init(void) { }
> @@ -553,13 +570,6 @@ int __init fadump_reserve_mem(void)
>  	if (!fw_dump.dump_active) {
>  		fw_dump.boot_memory_size =
>  			PAGE_ALIGN(fadump_calculate_reserve_size());
> -#ifdef CONFIG_CMA
> -		if (!fw_dump.nocma) {
> -			fw_dump.boot_memory_size =
> -				ALIGN(fw_dump.boot_memory_size,
> -				      CMA_MIN_ALIGNMENT_BYTES);
> -		}
> -#endif
>  
>  		bootmem_min = fw_dump.ops->fadump_get_bootmem_min();
>  		if (fw_dump.boot_memory_size < bootmem_min) {

[RFC v3 3/3] fadump: Move fadump_cma_init to setup_arch() after initmem_init()

[Ritesh Harjani (IBM)]

During early init CMA_MIN_ALIGNMENT_BYTES can be PAGE_SIZE,
since pageblock_order is still zero and it gets initialized
later during initmem_init() e.g.
setup_arch() -> initmem_init() -> sparse_init() -> set_pageblock_order()

One such use case where this causes issues is -
early_setup() -> early_init_devtree() -> fadump_reserve_mem() -> fadump_cma_init()

This causes CMA memory alignment check to be bypassed in
cma_init_reserved_mem(). Then later cma_activate_area() can hit
a VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(pfn & ((1 << order) - 1)) if the reserved memory
area was not pageblock_order aligned.

Fix it by moving the fadump_cma_init() after initmem_init(),
where other such cma reservations also gets called.

<stack trace>
==============
page: refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x10010
flags: 0x13ffff800000000(node=1|zone=0|lastcpupid=0x7ffff) CMA
raw: 013ffff800000000 5deadbeef0000100 5deadbeef0000122 0000000000000000
raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000000ffffffff 0000000000000000
page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(pfn & ((1 << order) - 1))
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at mm/page_alloc.c:778!

Call Trace:
__free_one_page+0x57c/0x7b0 (unreliable)
free_pcppages_bulk+0x1a8/0x2c8
free_unref_page_commit+0x3d4/0x4e4
free_unref_page+0x458/0x6d0
init_cma_reserved_pageblock+0x114/0x198
cma_init_reserved_areas+0x270/0x3e0
do_one_initcall+0x80/0x2f8
kernel_init_freeable+0x33c/0x530
kernel_init+0x34/0x26c
ret_from_kernel_user_thread+0x14/0x1c

Fixes: 11ac3e87ce09 ("mm: cma: use pageblock_order as the single alignment")
Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Sachin P Bappalige <sachinpb@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/fadump.h  | 7 +++++++
 arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c       | 6 +-----
 arch/powerpc/kernel/setup-common.c | 6 ++++--
 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/fadump.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/fadump.h
index ef40c9b6972a..3638f04447f5 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/fadump.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/fadump.h
@@ -34,4 +34,11 @@ extern int early_init_dt_scan_fw_dump(unsigned long node, const char *uname,
 				      int depth, void *data);
 extern int fadump_reserve_mem(void);
 #endif
+
+#if defined(CONFIG_FA_DUMP) && defined(CONFIG_CMA)
+void fadump_cma_init(void);
+#else
+static inline void fadump_cma_init(void) { }
+#endif
+
 #endif /* _ASM_POWERPC_FADUMP_H */
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c
index ffaec625b7a8..c42f89862893 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ static struct cma *fadump_cma;
  * But for some reason even if it fails we still have the memory reservation
  * with us and we can still continue doing fadump.
  */
-static void __init fadump_cma_init(void)
+void __init fadump_cma_init(void)
 {
 	unsigned long long base, size, end;
 	int rc;
@@ -139,8 +139,6 @@ static void __init fadump_cma_init(void)
 		fw_dump.boot_memory_size >> 20);
 	return;
 }
-#else
-static void __init fadump_cma_init(void) { }
 #endif /* CONFIG_CMA */
 
 /*
@@ -642,8 +640,6 @@ int __init fadump_reserve_mem(void)
 
 		pr_info("Reserved %lldMB of memory at %#016llx (System RAM: %lldMB)\n",
 			(size >> 20), base, (memblock_phys_mem_size() >> 20));
-
-		fadump_cma_init();
 	}
 
 	return ret;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup-common.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup-common.c
index 4bd2f87616ba..9f1e6f2e299e 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup-common.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup-common.c
@@ -996,9 +996,11 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
 	initmem_init();
 
 	/*
-	 * Reserve large chunks of memory for use by CMA for KVM and hugetlb. These must
-	 * be called after initmem_init(), so that pageblock_order is initialised.
+	 * Reserve large chunks of memory for use by CMA for fadump, KVM and
+	 * hugetlb. These must be called after initmem_init(), so that
+	 * pageblock_order is initialised.
 	 */
+	fadump_cma_init();
 	kvm_cma_reserve();
 	gigantic_hugetlb_cma_reserve();
 
-- 
2.46.0

Re: [RFC v3 3/3] fadump: Move fadump_cma_init to setup_arch() after initmem_init()

[Madhavan Srinivasan]

On 10/11/24 8:30 PM, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) wrote:
> During early init CMA_MIN_ALIGNMENT_BYTES can be PAGE_SIZE,
> since pageblock_order is still zero and it gets initialized
> later during initmem_init() e.g.
> setup_arch() -> initmem_init() -> sparse_init() -> set_pageblock_order()
> 
> One such use case where this causes issues is -
> early_setup() -> early_init_devtree() -> fadump_reserve_mem() -> fadump_cma_init()
> 
> This causes CMA memory alignment check to be bypassed in
> cma_init_reserved_mem(). Then later cma_activate_area() can hit
> a VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(pfn & ((1 << order) - 1)) if the reserved memory
> area was not pageblock_order aligned.
> 
> Fix it by moving the fadump_cma_init() after initmem_init(),
> where other such cma reservations also gets called.
> 
> <stack trace>
> ==============
> page: refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x10010
> flags: 0x13ffff800000000(node=1|zone=0|lastcpupid=0x7ffff) CMA
> raw: 013ffff800000000 5deadbeef0000100 5deadbeef0000122 0000000000000000
> raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000000ffffffff 0000000000000000
> page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(pfn & ((1 << order) - 1))
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> kernel BUG at mm/page_alloc.c:778!
> 
> Call Trace:
> __free_one_page+0x57c/0x7b0 (unreliable)
> free_pcppages_bulk+0x1a8/0x2c8
> free_unref_page_commit+0x3d4/0x4e4
> free_unref_page+0x458/0x6d0
> init_cma_reserved_pageblock+0x114/0x198
> cma_init_reserved_areas+0x270/0x3e0
> do_one_initcall+0x80/0x2f8
> kernel_init_freeable+0x33c/0x530
> kernel_init+0x34/0x26c
> ret_from_kernel_user_thread+0x14/0x1c
> 

Changes looks fine to me.
Reviewed-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>

> Fixes: 11ac3e87ce09 ("mm: cma: use pageblock_order as the single alignment")
> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Reported-by: Sachin P Bappalige <sachinpb@linux.ibm.com>
> Acked-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/fadump.h  | 7 +++++++
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c       | 6 +-----
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/setup-common.c | 6 ++++--
>  3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/fadump.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/fadump.h
> index ef40c9b6972a..3638f04447f5 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/fadump.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/fadump.h
> @@ -34,4 +34,11 @@ extern int early_init_dt_scan_fw_dump(unsigned long node, const char *uname,
>  				      int depth, void *data);
>  extern int fadump_reserve_mem(void);
>  #endif
> +
> +#if defined(CONFIG_FA_DUMP) && defined(CONFIG_CMA)
> +void fadump_cma_init(void);
> +#else
> +static inline void fadump_cma_init(void) { }
> +#endif
> +
>  #endif /* _ASM_POWERPC_FADUMP_H */
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c
> index ffaec625b7a8..c42f89862893 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c
> @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ static struct cma *fadump_cma;
>   * But for some reason even if it fails we still have the memory reservation
>   * with us and we can still continue doing fadump.
>   */
> -static void __init fadump_cma_init(void)
> +void __init fadump_cma_init(void)
>  {
>  	unsigned long long base, size, end;
>  	int rc;
> @@ -139,8 +139,6 @@ static void __init fadump_cma_init(void)
>  		fw_dump.boot_memory_size >> 20);
>  	return;
>  }
> -#else
> -static void __init fadump_cma_init(void) { }
>  #endif /* CONFIG_CMA */
>  
>  /*
> @@ -642,8 +640,6 @@ int __init fadump_reserve_mem(void)
>  
>  		pr_info("Reserved %lldMB of memory at %#016llx (System RAM: %lldMB)\n",
>  			(size >> 20), base, (memblock_phys_mem_size() >> 20));
> -
> -		fadump_cma_init();
>  	}
>  
>  	return ret;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup-common.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup-common.c
> index 4bd2f87616ba..9f1e6f2e299e 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup-common.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup-common.c
> @@ -996,9 +996,11 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
>  	initmem_init();
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * Reserve large chunks of memory for use by CMA for KVM and hugetlb. These must
> -	 * be called after initmem_init(), so that pageblock_order is initialised.
> +	 * Reserve large chunks of memory for use by CMA for fadump, KVM and
> +	 * hugetlb. These must be called after initmem_init(), so that
> +	 * pageblock_order is initialised.
>  	 */
> +	fadump_cma_init();
>  	kvm_cma_reserve();
>  	gigantic_hugetlb_cma_reserve();
>  

Re: [RFC v3 1/3] fadump: Refactor and prepare fadump_cma_init for late init

[Madhavan Srinivasan]

On 10/11/24 8:30 PM, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) wrote:
> We anyway don't use any return values from fadump_cma_init(). Since
> fadump_reserve_mem() from where fadump_cma_init() gets called today,
> already has the required checks.
> This patch makes this function return type as void. Let's also handle
> extra cases like return if fadump_supported is false or dump_active, so
> that in later patches we can call fadump_cma_init() separately from
> setup_arch().

Usually patches to this file are posted with title format of

powerpc/fadump:<>


> 
> Acked-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
> ---
> v2 -> v3: Separated the series into 2 as discussed in v2.
> [v2]: https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/cover.1728585512.git.ritesh.list@gmail.com/
> 
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c | 23 +++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c
> index a612e7513a4f..162327d66982 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c
> @@ -78,27 +78,23 @@ static struct cma *fadump_cma;
>   * But for some reason even if it fails we still have the memory reservation
>   * with us and we can still continue doing fadump.
>   */
> -static int __init fadump_cma_init(void)
> +static void __init fadump_cma_init(void)
>  {
>  	unsigned long long base, size;
>  	int rc;
> 
> -	if (!fw_dump.fadump_enabled)
> -		return 0;
> -
> +	if (!fw_dump.fadump_supported || !fw_dump.fadump_enabled ||
> +			fw_dump.dump_active)
> +		return;

Is these checks even needed here? fadump_reserve_mem() checked for all
these already, also dont see any other caller for fadump_cma_init(). 


>  	/*
>  	 * Do not use CMA if user has provided fadump=nocma kernel parameter.
> -	 * Return 1 to continue with fadump old behaviour.
>  	 */
> -	if (fw_dump.nocma)
> -		return 1;
> +	if (fw_dump.nocma || !fw_dump.boot_memory_size)
> +		return;
> 
>  	base = fw_dump.reserve_dump_area_start;
>  	size = fw_dump.boot_memory_size;
> 
> -	if (!size)
> -		return 0;

So this is the only place where we return 0, which in turn will make the
"ret" in fadump_reserve_mem() as zero forcing to call reserve_crashkernel()
in early_init_devtree().

we are removing it, becos we know "size" here will never be zero?


> -
>  	rc = cma_init_reserved_mem(base, size, 0, "fadump_cma", &fadump_cma);
>  	if (rc) {
>  		pr_err("Failed to init cma area for firmware-assisted dump,%d\n", rc);
> @@ -108,7 +104,7 @@ static int __init fadump_cma_init(void)
>  		 * blocked from production system usage.  Hence return 1,
>  		 * so that we can continue with fadump.
>  		 */
> -		return 1;
> +		return;
>  	}
> 
>  	/*
> @@ -125,10 +121,9 @@ static int __init fadump_cma_init(void)
>  		cma_get_size(fadump_cma),
>  		(unsigned long)cma_get_base(fadump_cma) >> 20,
>  		fw_dump.reserve_dump_area_size);
> -	return 1;
>  }
>  #else
> -static int __init fadump_cma_init(void) { return 1; }
> +static void __init fadump_cma_init(void) { }
>  #endif /* CONFIG_CMA */
> 
>  /*
> @@ -638,7 +633,7 @@ int __init fadump_reserve_mem(void)
>  		pr_info("Reserved %lldMB of memory at %#016llx (System RAM: %lldMB)\n",
>  			(size >> 20), base, (memblock_phys_mem_size() >> 20));
> 
> -		ret = fadump_cma_init();
> +		fadump_cma_init();
>  	}
> 
>  	return ret;
> --
> 2.46.0
> 

Re: [RFC v3 1/3] fadump: Refactor and prepare fadump_cma_init for late init

[Ritesh Harjani]

Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> writes:

> On 10/11/24 8:30 PM, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) wrote:
>> We anyway don't use any return values from fadump_cma_init(). Since
>> fadump_reserve_mem() from where fadump_cma_init() gets called today,
>> already has the required checks.
>> This patch makes this function return type as void. Let's also handle
>> extra cases like return if fadump_supported is false or dump_active, so
>> that in later patches we can call fadump_cma_init() separately from
>> setup_arch().
>
> Usually patches to this file are posted with title format of
>
> powerpc/fadump:<>

yes. I guess it is good to do it that way (I might have missed it)
Although commit history of oldest few patches to fadump shows..

ebaeb5ae2437 fadump: Convert firmware-assisted cpu state dump data into elf notes.
2df173d9e85d fadump: Initialize elfcore header and add PT_LOAD program headers.
3ccc00a7e04f fadump: Register for firmware assisted dump.
eb39c8803d0e fadump: Reserve the memory for firmware assisted dump.

>
>
>> 
>> Acked-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> v2 -> v3: Separated the series into 2 as discussed in v2.
>> [v2]: https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/cover.1728585512.git.ritesh.list@gmail.com/
>> 
>>  arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c | 23 +++++++++--------------
>>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c
>> index a612e7513a4f..162327d66982 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c
>> @@ -78,27 +78,23 @@ static struct cma *fadump_cma;
>>   * But for some reason even if it fails we still have the memory reservation
>>   * with us and we can still continue doing fadump.
>>   */
>> -static int __init fadump_cma_init(void)
>> +static void __init fadump_cma_init(void)
>>  {
>>  	unsigned long long base, size;
>>  	int rc;
>> 
>> -	if (!fw_dump.fadump_enabled)
>> -		return 0;
>> -
>> +	if (!fw_dump.fadump_supported || !fw_dump.fadump_enabled ||
>> +			fw_dump.dump_active)
>> +		return;
>
> Is these checks even needed here? fadump_reserve_mem() checked for all
> these already, also dont see any other caller for fadump_cma_init(). 
>
>

In the next patch we will move fadump_cma_init() call from within
fadump_reserve_mem() to setup_arch(). Hence we need these extra checks
in fadump_cma_init() as well. I mentioned the same in the commit msg of
this patch too.

>>  	/*
>>  	 * Do not use CMA if user has provided fadump=nocma kernel parameter.
>> -	 * Return 1 to continue with fadump old behaviour.
>>  	 */
>> -	if (fw_dump.nocma)
>> -		return 1;
>> +	if (fw_dump.nocma || !fw_dump.boot_memory_size)
>> +		return;
>> 
>>  	base = fw_dump.reserve_dump_area_start;
>>  	size = fw_dump.boot_memory_size;
>> 
>> -	if (!size)
>> -		return 0;
>
> So this is the only place where we return 0, which in turn will make the
> "ret" in fadump_reserve_mem() as zero forcing to call reserve_crashkernel()
> in early_init_devtree().
>
> we are removing it, becos we know "size" here will never be zero?
>
>

yes. Because we already check if boot_memory_size is less than
bootmem_min in fadump_reserve_mem(). If it is less, then we fail and
disable fadump (fadump_enabled = 0).

So then there is no need to check for !boot_memory_size in here.

fadump_reseve_mem( ) {
<...>
	if (!fw_dump.dump_active) {
		fw_dump.boot_memory_size =
			PAGE_ALIGN(fadump_calculate_reserve_size());

		bootmem_min = fw_dump.ops->fadump_get_bootmem_min();
		if (fw_dump.boot_memory_size < bootmem_min) {
			pr_err("Can't enable fadump with boot memory size (0x%lx) less than 0x%llx\n",
			       fw_dump.boot_memory_size, bootmem_min);
			goto error_out;
		}
    <...>    
    }
<...>
error_out:
	fw_dump.fadump_enabled = 0;
	fw_dump.reserve_dump_area_size = 0;
	return 0;
}


Thanks for the review!
-ritesh

Re: [RFC v3 1/3] fadump: Refactor and prepare fadump_cma_init for late init

[Madhavan Srinivasan]

On 10/14/24 4:54 PM, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) wrote:
> Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> writes:
> 
>> On 10/11/24 8:30 PM, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) wrote:
>>> We anyway don't use any return values from fadump_cma_init(). Since
>>> fadump_reserve_mem() from where fadump_cma_init() gets called today,
>>> already has the required checks.
>>> This patch makes this function return type as void. Let's also handle
>>> extra cases like return if fadump_supported is false or dump_active, so
>>> that in later patches we can call fadump_cma_init() separately from
>>> setup_arch().
>>
>> Usually patches to this file are posted with title format of
>>
>> powerpc/fadump:<>
> 
> yes. I guess it is good to do it that way (I might have missed it)
> Although commit history of oldest few patches to fadump shows..
> 
> ebaeb5ae2437 fadump: Convert firmware-assisted cpu state dump data into elf notes.
> 2df173d9e85d fadump: Initialize elfcore header and add PT_LOAD program headers.
> 3ccc00a7e04f fadump: Register for firmware assisted dump.
> eb39c8803d0e fadump: Reserve the memory for firmware assisted dump.
> 
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>> v2 -> v3: Separated the series into 2 as discussed in v2.
>>> [v2]: https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/cover.1728585512.git.ritesh.list@gmail.com/
>>>
>>>  arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c | 23 +++++++++--------------
>>>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c
>>> index a612e7513a4f..162327d66982 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c
>>> @@ -78,27 +78,23 @@ static struct cma *fadump_cma;
>>>   * But for some reason even if it fails we still have the memory reservation
>>>   * with us and we can still continue doing fadump.
>>>   */
>>> -static int __init fadump_cma_init(void)
>>> +static void __init fadump_cma_init(void)
>>>  {
>>>  	unsigned long long base, size;
>>>  	int rc;
>>>
>>> -	if (!fw_dump.fadump_enabled)
>>> -		return 0;
>>> -
>>> +	if (!fw_dump.fadump_supported || !fw_dump.fadump_enabled ||
>>> +			fw_dump.dump_active)
>>> +		return;
>>
>> Is these checks even needed here? fadump_reserve_mem() checked for all
>> these already, also dont see any other caller for fadump_cma_init(). 
>>
>>
> 
> In the next patch we will move fadump_cma_init() call from within
> fadump_reserve_mem() to setup_arch(). Hence we need these extra checks
> in fadump_cma_init() as well. I mentioned the same in the commit msg of
> this patch too.
> 

yes, just saw that when looking at the patch 3, sorry for the noise.


>>>  	/*
>>>  	 * Do not use CMA if user has provided fadump=nocma kernel parameter.
>>> -	 * Return 1 to continue with fadump old behaviour.
>>>  	 */
>>> -	if (fw_dump.nocma)
>>> -		return 1;
>>> +	if (fw_dump.nocma || !fw_dump.boot_memory_size)
>>> +		return;
>>>
>>>  	base = fw_dump.reserve_dump_area_start;
>>>  	size = fw_dump.boot_memory_size;
>>>
>>> -	if (!size)
>>> -		return 0;
>>
>> So this is the only place where we return 0, which in turn will make the
>> "ret" in fadump_reserve_mem() as zero forcing to call reserve_crashkernel()
>> in early_init_devtree().
>>
>> we are removing it, becos we know "size" here will never be zero?
>>
>>
> 
> yes. Because we already check if boot_memory_size is less than
> bootmem_min in fadump_reserve_mem(). If it is less, then we fail and
> disable fadump (fadump_enabled = 0).
>

Thanks for the clarification.


 
> So then there is no need to check for !boot_memory_size in here.
> 
> fadump_reseve_mem( ) {
> <...>
> 	if (!fw_dump.dump_active) {
> 		fw_dump.boot_memory_size =
> 			PAGE_ALIGN(fadump_calculate_reserve_size());
> 
> 		bootmem_min = fw_dump.ops->fadump_get_bootmem_min();
> 		if (fw_dump.boot_memory_size < bootmem_min) {
> 			pr_err("Can't enable fadump with boot memory size (0x%lx) less than 0x%llx\n",
> 			       fw_dump.boot_memory_size, bootmem_min);
> 			goto error_out;
> 		}
>     <...>    
>     }
> <...>
> error_out:
> 	fw_dump.fadump_enabled = 0;
> 	fw_dump.reserve_dump_area_size = 0;
> 	return 0;
> }
> 
> 
> Thanks for the review!
> -ritesh

Re: [RFC v3 1/3] fadump: Refactor and prepare fadump_cma_init for late init

[Madhavan Srinivasan]

On 10/14/24 4:54 PM, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) wrote:
> Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> writes:
> 
>> On 10/11/24 8:30 PM, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) wrote:
>>> We anyway don't use any return values from fadump_cma_init(). Since
>>> fadump_reserve_mem() from where fadump_cma_init() gets called today,
>>> already has the required checks.
>>> This patch makes this function return type as void. Let's also handle
>>> extra cases like return if fadump_supported is false or dump_active, so
>>> that in later patches we can call fadump_cma_init() separately from
>>> setup_arch().
>>
>> Usually patches to this file are posted with title format of
>>
>> powerpc/fadump:<>
> 
> yes. I guess it is good to do it that way (I might have missed it)
> Although commit history of oldest few patches to fadump shows..
> 
> ebaeb5ae2437 fadump: Convert firmware-assisted cpu state dump data into elf notes.
> 2df173d9e85d fadump: Initialize elfcore header and add PT_LOAD program headers.
> 3ccc00a7e04f fadump: Register for firmware assisted dump.
> eb39c8803d0e fadump: Reserve the memory for firmware assisted dump.
> 
>>

Patchset looks fine to me. 

Reviewed-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> for the series.


>>
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>> v2 -> v3: Separated the series into 2 as discussed in v2.
>>> [v2]: https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/cover.1728585512.git.ritesh.list@gmail.com/
>>>
>>>  arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c | 23 +++++++++--------------
>>>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c
>>> index a612e7513a4f..162327d66982 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c
>>> @@ -78,27 +78,23 @@ static struct cma *fadump_cma;
>>>   * But for some reason even if it fails we still have the memory reservation
>>>   * with us and we can still continue doing fadump.
>>>   */
>>> -static int __init fadump_cma_init(void)
>>> +static void __init fadump_cma_init(void)
>>>  {
>>>  	unsigned long long base, size;
>>>  	int rc;
>>>
>>> -	if (!fw_dump.fadump_enabled)
>>> -		return 0;
>>> -
>>> +	if (!fw_dump.fadump_supported || !fw_dump.fadump_enabled ||
>>> +			fw_dump.dump_active)
>>> +		return;
>>
>> Is these checks even needed here? fadump_reserve_mem() checked for all
>> these already, also dont see any other caller for fadump_cma_init(). 
>>
>>
> 
> In the next patch we will move fadump_cma_init() call from within
> fadump_reserve_mem() to setup_arch(). Hence we need these extra checks
> in fadump_cma_init() as well. I mentioned the same in the commit msg of
> this patch too.
> 
>>>  	/*
>>>  	 * Do not use CMA if user has provided fadump=nocma kernel parameter.
>>> -	 * Return 1 to continue with fadump old behaviour.
>>>  	 */
>>> -	if (fw_dump.nocma)
>>> -		return 1;
>>> +	if (fw_dump.nocma || !fw_dump.boot_memory_size)
>>> +		return;
>>>
>>>  	base = fw_dump.reserve_dump_area_start;
>>>  	size = fw_dump.boot_memory_size;
>>>
>>> -	if (!size)
>>> -		return 0;
>>
>> So this is the only place where we return 0, which in turn will make the
>> "ret" in fadump_reserve_mem() as zero forcing to call reserve_crashkernel()
>> in early_init_devtree().
>>
>> we are removing it, becos we know "size" here will never be zero?
>>
>>
> 
> yes. Because we already check if boot_memory_size is less than
> bootmem_min in fadump_reserve_mem(). If it is less, then we fail and
> disable fadump (fadump_enabled = 0).
> 
> So then there is no need to check for !boot_memory_size in here.
> 
> fadump_reseve_mem( ) {
> <...>
> 	if (!fw_dump.dump_active) {
> 		fw_dump.boot_memory_size =
> 			PAGE_ALIGN(fadump_calculate_reserve_size());
> 
> 		bootmem_min = fw_dump.ops->fadump_get_bootmem_min();
> 		if (fw_dump.boot_memory_size < bootmem_min) {
> 			pr_err("Can't enable fadump with boot memory size (0x%lx) less than 0x%llx\n",
> 			       fw_dump.boot_memory_size, bootmem_min);
> 			goto error_out;
> 		}
>     <...>    
>     }
> <...>
> error_out:
> 	fw_dump.fadump_enabled = 0;
> 	fw_dump.reserve_dump_area_size = 0;
> 	return 0;
> }
> 
> 
> Thanks for the review!
> -ritesh

Re: [RFC v3 1/3] fadump: Refactor and prepare fadump_cma_init for late init

[Ritesh Harjani]

Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> writes:

>
> Patchset looks fine to me. 
>
> Reviewed-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> for the series.
>

Thanks Maddy for the reviews! 
I will spin PATCH v4 with these minor suggested changes (No code changes)

-ritesh