From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
simon.guinot@sequanux.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, rkrcmar@redhat.com,
matt@codeblueprint.co.uk, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linus.walleij@linaro.org, gary.hook@amd.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, hpa@zytor.com, cl@linux.com,
dan.j.williams@intel.com, aarcange@redhat.com,
sfr@canb.auug.org.au, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com,
herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, bhe@redhat.com, xemul@parallels.com,
joro@8bytes.org, x86@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
piotr.luc@intel.com, mingo@redhat.com, msalter@redhat.com,
ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com, bp@suse.de, dyoung@redhat.com,
thomas.lendacky@amd.com, jroedel@suse.de, keescook@chromium.org,
arnd@arndb.de, toshi.kani@hpe.com,
mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, luto@kernel.org,
devel@linuxdriverproject.org, bhelgaas@google.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, mchehab@kernel.org, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com,
labbott@fedoraproject.org, tony.luck@intel.com,
alexandre.bounine@idt.com, kuleshovmail@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mcgrof@kernel.org, mst@redhat.com,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, tj@kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 16/32] x86: kvm: Provide support to create Guest and HV shared per-CPU variables
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 12:06:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <02c00224-6b4d-4256-ead0-854755d6d0ea@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <148846773666.2349.9492983018843773590.stgit@brijesh-build-machine>
On 02/03/2017 16:15, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> Some KVM specific MSR's (steal-time, asyncpf, avic_eio) allocates per-CPU
> variable at compile time and share its physical address with hypervisor.
> It presents a challege when SEV is active in guest OS. When SEV is active,
> guest memory is encrypted with guest key and hypervisor will no longer able
> to modify the guest memory. When SEV is active, we need to clear the
> encryption attribute of shared physical addresses so that both guest and
> hypervisor can access the data.
>
> To solve this problem, I have tried these three options:
>
> 1) Convert the static per-CPU to dynamic per-CPU allocation. When SEV is
> detected then clear the encryption attribute. But while doing so I found
> that per-CPU dynamic allocator was not ready when kvm_guest_cpu_init was
> called.
>
> 2) Since the encryption attributes works on PAGE_SIZE hence add some extra
> padding to 'struct kvm-steal-time' to make it PAGE_SIZE and then at runtime
> clear the encryption attribute of the full PAGE. The downside of this was
> now we need to modify structure which may break the compatibility.
>
> 3) Define a new per-CPU section (.data..percpu.hv_shared) which will be
> used to hold the compile time shared per-CPU variables. When SEV is
> detected we map this section with encryption attribute cleared.
>
> This patch implements #3. It introduces a new DEFINE_PER_CPU_HV_SHAHRED
> macro to create a compile time per-CPU variable. When SEV is detected we
> map the per-CPU variable as decrypted (i.e with encryption attribute cleared).
>
> Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Looks good to me.
Paolo
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h | 3 +++
> include/linux/percpu-defs.h | 9 ++++++++
> 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
> index 099fcba..706a08e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
> @@ -75,8 +75,8 @@ static int parse_no_kvmclock_vsyscall(char *arg)
>
> early_param("no-kvmclock-vsyscall", parse_no_kvmclock_vsyscall);
>
> -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kvm_vcpu_pv_apf_data, apf_reason) __aligned(64);
> -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kvm_steal_time, steal_time) __aligned(64);
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU_HV_SHARED(struct kvm_vcpu_pv_apf_data, apf_reason) __aligned(64);
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU_HV_SHARED(struct kvm_steal_time, steal_time) __aligned(64);
> static int has_steal_clock = 0;
>
> /*
> @@ -290,6 +290,22 @@ static void __init paravirt_ops_setup(void)
> #endif
> }
>
> +static int kvm_map_percpu_hv_shared(void *addr, unsigned long size)
> +{
> + /* When SEV is active, the percpu static variables initialized
> + * in data section will contain the encrypted data so we first
> + * need to decrypt it and then map it as decrypted.
> + */
> + if (sev_active()) {
> + unsigned long pa = slow_virt_to_phys(addr);
> +
> + sme_early_decrypt(pa, size);
> + return early_set_memory_decrypted(addr, size);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static void kvm_register_steal_time(void)
> {
> int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> @@ -298,12 +314,17 @@ static void kvm_register_steal_time(void)
> if (!has_steal_clock)
> return;
>
> + if (kvm_map_percpu_hv_shared(st, sizeof(*st))) {
> + pr_err("kvm-stealtime: failed to map hv_shared percpu\n");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> wrmsrl(MSR_KVM_STEAL_TIME, (slow_virt_to_phys(st) | KVM_MSR_ENABLED));
> pr_info("kvm-stealtime: cpu %d, msr %llx\n",
> cpu, (unsigned long long) slow_virt_to_phys(st));
> }
>
> -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, kvm_apic_eoi) = KVM_PV_EOI_DISABLED;
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU_HV_SHARED(unsigned long, kvm_apic_eoi) = KVM_PV_EOI_DISABLED;
>
> static notrace void kvm_guest_apic_eoi_write(u32 reg, u32 val)
> {
> @@ -327,25 +348,33 @@ static void kvm_guest_cpu_init(void)
> if (kvm_para_has_feature(KVM_FEATURE_ASYNC_PF) && kvmapf) {
> u64 pa = slow_virt_to_phys(this_cpu_ptr(&apf_reason));
>
> + if (kvm_map_percpu_hv_shared(this_cpu_ptr(&apf_reason),
> + sizeof(struct kvm_vcpu_pv_apf_data)))
> + goto skip_asyncpf;
> #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
> pa |= KVM_ASYNC_PF_SEND_ALWAYS;
> #endif
> wrmsrl(MSR_KVM_ASYNC_PF_EN, pa | KVM_ASYNC_PF_ENABLED);
> __this_cpu_write(apf_reason.enabled, 1);
> - printk(KERN_INFO"KVM setup async PF for cpu %d\n",
> - smp_processor_id());
> + printk(KERN_INFO"KVM setup async PF for cpu %d msr %llx\n",
> + smp_processor_id(), pa);
> }
> -
> +skip_asyncpf:
> if (kvm_para_has_feature(KVM_FEATURE_PV_EOI)) {
> unsigned long pa;
> /* Size alignment is implied but just to make it explicit. */
> BUILD_BUG_ON(__alignof__(kvm_apic_eoi) < 4);
> + if (kvm_map_percpu_hv_shared(this_cpu_ptr(&kvm_apic_eoi),
> + sizeof(unsigned long)))
> + goto skip_pv_eoi;
> __this_cpu_write(kvm_apic_eoi, 0);
> pa = slow_virt_to_phys(this_cpu_ptr(&kvm_apic_eoi))
> | KVM_MSR_ENABLED;
> wrmsrl(MSR_KVM_PV_EOI_EN, pa);
> + printk(KERN_INFO"KVM setup PV EOI for cpu %d msr %lx\n",
> + smp_processor_id(), pa);
> }
> -
> +skip_pv_eoi:
> if (has_steal_clock)
> kvm_register_steal_time();
> }
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h b/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
> index 0968d13..8d29910 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
> @@ -773,6 +773,9 @@
> . = ALIGN(cacheline); \
> *(.data..percpu) \
> *(.data..percpu..shared_aligned) \
> + . = ALIGN(PAGE_SIZE); \
> + *(.data..percpu..hv_shared) \
> + . = ALIGN(PAGE_SIZE); \
> VMLINUX_SYMBOL(__per_cpu_end) = .;
>
> /**
> diff --git a/include/linux/percpu-defs.h b/include/linux/percpu-defs.h
> index 8f16299..5af366e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/percpu-defs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/percpu-defs.h
> @@ -172,6 +172,15 @@
> #define DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(type, name) \
> DEFINE_PER_CPU_SECTION(type, name, "..read_mostly")
>
> +/* Declaration/definition used for per-CPU variables that must be shared
> + * between hypervisor and guest OS.
> + */
> +#define DECLARE_PER_CPU_HV_SHARED(type, name) \
> + DECLARE_PER_CPU_SECTION(type, name, "..hv_shared")
> +
> +#define DEFINE_PER_CPU_HV_SHARED(type, name) \
> + DEFINE_PER_CPU_SECTION(type, name, "..hv_shared")
> +
> /*
> * Intermodule exports for per-CPU variables. sparse forgets about
> * address space across EXPORT_SYMBOL(), change EXPORT_SYMBOL() to
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-16 11:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 107+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-02 15:12 [RFC PATCH v2 00/32] x86: Secure Encrypted Virtualization (AMD) Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:12 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/32] x86: Add the Secure Encrypted Virtualization CPU feature Brijesh Singh
2017-03-03 16:59 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-03 21:01 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-04 10:11 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-06 18:11 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-06 20:54 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-02 15:12 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/32] x86: Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) support Brijesh Singh
2017-03-07 11:19 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-08 15:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-02 15:12 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/32] KVM: SVM: prepare for new bit definition in nested_ctl Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:12 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/32] KVM: SVM: Add SEV feature definitions to KVM Brijesh Singh
2017-03-07 0:50 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-02 15:12 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/32] x86: Use encrypted access of BOOT related data with SEV Brijesh Singh
2017-03-07 11:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-16 19:03 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-03-02 15:13 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/32] x86/pci: Use memremap when walking setup data Brijesh Singh
2017-03-03 20:42 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-03-03 21:15 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-03-07 0:03 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-03-13 20:08 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-03-02 15:13 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/32] x86/efi: Access EFI data as encrypted when SEV is active Brijesh Singh
2017-03-07 11:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-02 15:13 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/32] x86: Use PAGE_KERNEL protection for ioremap of memory page Brijesh Singh
2017-03-07 14:59 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-16 20:04 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-03-17 14:32 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-03-17 14:55 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-03-02 15:13 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/32] x86: Change early_ioremap to early_memremap for BOOT data Brijesh Singh
2017-03-08 8:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-02 15:14 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/32] x86: DMA support for SEV memory encryption Brijesh Singh
2017-03-08 10:56 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-02 15:14 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/32] x86: Unroll string I/O when SEV is active Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:14 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/32] x86: Add early boot support when running with SEV active Brijesh Singh
2017-03-09 14:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-09 16:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-09 16:29 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-10 16:35 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-16 10:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-16 14:28 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-03-16 15:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-16 16:11 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-03-16 16:29 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-02 15:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/32] KVM: SVM: Enable SEV by setting the SEV_ENABLE CPU feature Brijesh Singh
2017-03-09 19:29 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-02 15:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/32] x86: mm: Provide support to use memblock when spliting large pages Brijesh Singh
2017-03-10 11:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-10 22:41 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-16 13:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-16 18:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-16 22:25 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-17 10:17 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-17 10:47 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-17 10:56 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-17 11:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-17 11:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-17 14:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-18 16:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-06 14:05 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-04-06 17:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-06 18:37 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-04-07 11:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-07 14:50 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-16 12:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-02 15:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 15/32] x86: Add support for changing memory encryption attribute in early boot Brijesh Singh
2017-03-24 17:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-27 15:07 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 16/32] x86: kvm: Provide support to create Guest and HV shared per-CPU variables Brijesh Singh
2017-03-16 11:06 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2017-03-28 18:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-29 15:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-29 15:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-02 15:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 17/32] x86: kvmclock: Clear encryption attribute when SEV is active Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 18/32] kvm: svm: Use the hardware provided GPA instead of page walk Brijesh Singh
2017-03-29 15:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-29 17:08 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 19/32] crypto: ccp: Introduce the AMD Secure Processor device Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 17:39 ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-02 19:11 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-03 13:55 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-03-02 15:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 20/32] crypto: ccp: Add Platform Security Processor (PSP) interface support Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 21/32] crypto: ccp: Add Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) " Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 22/32] kvm: svm: prepare to reserve asid for SEV guest Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:17 ` [RFC PATCH v2 23/32] kvm: introduce KVM_MEMORY_ENCRYPT_OP ioctl Brijesh Singh
2017-03-16 10:25 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-02 15:17 ` [RFC PATCH v2 24/32] kvm: x86: prepare for SEV guest management API support Brijesh Singh
2017-03-16 10:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-02 15:17 ` [RFC PATCH v2 25/32] kvm: svm: Add support for SEV LAUNCH_START command Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:17 ` [RFC PATCH v2 26/32] kvm: svm: Add support for SEV LAUNCH_UPDATE_DATA command Brijesh Singh
2017-03-16 10:48 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-16 18:20 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:17 ` [RFC PATCH v2 27/32] kvm: svm: Add support for SEV LAUNCH_FINISH command Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH v2 28/32] kvm: svm: Add support for SEV GUEST_STATUS command Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH v2 29/32] kvm: svm: Add support for SEV DEBUG_DECRYPT command Brijesh Singh
2017-03-16 10:54 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-16 18:41 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-17 11:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-02 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH v2 30/32] kvm: svm: Add support for SEV DEBUG_ENCRYPT command Brijesh Singh
2017-03-16 11:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-16 18:34 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH v2 31/32] kvm: svm: Add support for SEV LAUNCH_MEASURE command Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH v2 32/32] x86: kvm: Pin the guest memory when SEV is active Brijesh Singh
2017-03-16 10:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-16 18:17 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-03 20:33 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/32] x86: Secure Encrypted Virtualization (AMD) Bjorn Helgaas
2017-03-03 20:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-03 21:15 ` Brijesh Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=02c00224-6b4d-4256-ead0-854755d6d0ea@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexandre.bounine@idt.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=gary.hook@amd.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kuleshovmail@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=labbott@fedoraproject.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=msalter@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=piotr.luc@intel.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=simon.guinot@sequanux.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=toshi.kani@hpe.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xemul@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox