From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Arun KS <arunks@codeaurora.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Arun Sudhilal <getarunks@gmail.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: convert totalram_pages, totalhigh_pages and managed_pages to atomic.
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 01:39:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <02a1bfc2eed324f3d03aa4a7b5eb6fde4e4a3bdd.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181024082312.GD18839@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On Wed, 2018-10-24 at 10:23 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 23-10-18 23:26:16, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Wed, 2018-10-24 at 08:15 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Wed 24-10-18 10:47:52, Arun KS wrote:
> > > > On 2018-10-24 01:34, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > > Thank you -- I was struggling to figure out the best way to reply to
> > > > > this. :)
> > > > I'm sorry for the trouble caused. Sent the email using,
> > > > git send-email --to-cmd="scripts/get_maintainer.pl -i"
> > > > 0001-convert-totalram_pages-totalhigh_pages-and-managed_p.patch
> > > >
> > > > Is this not a recommended approach?
> > >
> > > Not really for tree wide mechanical changes. It is much more preferrable
> > > IMHO to only CC people who should review the intention of the change
> > > rather than each and every maintainer whose code is going to be changed.
> > > This is a case by case thing of course but as soon as you see a giant CC
> > > list from get_maintainer.pl then you should try to think twice to use
> > > it. If not sure, just ask on the mailing list.
> >
> > Generally, it's better to use scripts to control
> > the --to-cmd and --cc-cmd options.
>
> I would argue that it is better to use a common sense much more than
> scripts.
Common sense isn't common.
Perhaps you could describe some guidelines you
use to determine what you think is sensible to
send patches to maintainers and reviewers and
appropriate mailing lists.
Then compare those to the rules in the scripts
I suggested.
My suggestions:
o send to all top-level listed maintainers and
reviewers in MAINTAINERS for the specific files
in a patch
o cc all maintainers and reviewers that are upstream
paths for the files in a patch
o cc all the upstream mailing lists for the files
in the patch.
o do not generally use git-history to exclude authors
of patches like drive-by/whitespace cleanups
Other advanced possibilities for patches that
modify specific and perhaps complex logic blocks:
o cc the people that are not maintainers that
have modified the specific blocks or functions
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-24 8:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1540229092-25207-1-git-send-email-arunks@codeaurora.org>
[not found] ` <1540229092-25207-1-git-send-email-arunks-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
2018-10-22 18:11 ` Michal Hocko
[not found] ` <20181022181122.GK18839-2MMpYkNvuYDjFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org>
2018-10-23 4:46 ` Arun Sudhilal
2018-10-23 5:33 ` Michal Hocko
2018-10-23 6:13 ` Julia Lawall
2018-10-23 7:11 ` Arun Sudhilal
2018-10-25 5:31 ` Arun KS
2018-10-23 5:37 ` Huang, Ying
2018-11-22 1:33 ` Guo Ren
[not found] ` <c57bcc584b3700c483b0311881ec3ae8786f88b1.camel@perches.com>
[not found] ` <c57bcc584b3700c483b0311881ec3ae8786f88b1.camel-6d6DIl74uiNBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2018-10-23 4:48 ` Arun KS
2018-10-23 5:11 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2018-10-23 20:04 ` Kees Cook
2018-10-24 5:17 ` Arun KS
2018-10-24 6:15 ` Michal Hocko
2018-10-24 6:26 ` Joe Perches
2018-10-24 8:23 ` Michal Hocko
2018-10-24 8:39 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2018-10-25 9:21 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=02a1bfc2eed324f3d03aa4a7b5eb6fde4e4a3bdd.camel@perches.com \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arunks@codeaurora.org \
--cc=getarunks@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox