linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tianyang Zhang <zhangtianyang@loongson.cn>
To: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc.c: Avoid infinite retries caused by cpuset race
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 20:10:06 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <025e3f51-2ab5-bc58-5475-b57103169a82@loongson.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aAYXP4f417_bx6Is@harry>

Hi.

在 2025/4/21 下午6:00, Harry Yoo 写道:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 04:24:05PM +0800, Tianyang Zhang wrote:
>> __alloc_pages_slowpath has no change detection for ac->nodemask
>> in the part of retry path, while cpuset can modify it in parallel.
>> For some processes that set mempolicy as MPOL_BIND, this results
>> ac->nodemask changes, and then the should_reclaim_retry will
>> judge based on the latest nodemask and jump to retry, while the
>> get_page_from_freelist only traverses the zonelist from
>> ac->preferred_zoneref, which selected by a expired nodemask
>> and may cause infinite retries in some cases
>>
>> cpu 64:
>> __alloc_pages_slowpath {
>>          /* ..... */
>> retry:
>>          /* ac->nodemask = 0x1, ac->preferred->zone->nid = 1 */
>>          if (alloc_flags & ALLOC_KSWAPD)
>>                  wake_all_kswapds(order, gfp_mask, ac);
>>          /* cpu 1:
>>          cpuset_write_resmask
>>              update_nodemask
>>                  update_nodemasks_hier
>>                      update_tasks_nodemask
>>                          mpol_rebind_task
>>                           mpol_rebind_policy
>>                            mpol_rebind_nodemask
>> 		// mempolicy->nodes has been modified,
>> 		// which ac->nodemask point to
>>
>>          */
>>          /* ac->nodemask = 0x3, ac->preferred->zone->nid = 1 */
>>          if (should_reclaim_retry(gfp_mask, order, ac, alloc_flags,
>>                                   did_some_progress > 0, &no_progress_loops))
>>                  goto retry;
>> }
>>
>> Simultaneously starting multiple cpuset01 from LTP can quickly
>> reproduce this issue on a multi node server when the maximum
>> memory pressure is reached and the swap is enabled
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tianyang Zhang <zhangtianyang@loongson.cn>
>> ---
> What commit does it fix and should it be backported to -stable?
>
> There's a new 'MEMORY MANAGEMENT - PAGE ALLOCATOR' entry (only in
> Andrew's mm.git repository now).
>
> Let's Cc the page allocator folks here!

We first identified this issue in 6.6.52-stable , and through root cause 
analysis,

it appears the problem may have existed for a significant period.

However It is recommended that the fix should be backported to at least 
Linux kernel versions after 6.6-stable



  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-04-22 12:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-16  8:24 Tianyang Zhang
2025-04-21 10:00 ` Harry Yoo
2025-04-21 20:28   ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-04-23  2:38     ` Tianyang Zhang
2025-04-23 15:35       ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-05-14  7:15         ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-04-22 12:10   ` Tianyang Zhang [this message]
2025-04-23  0:11     ` Andrew Morton
2025-04-23  0:22       ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-05-11  3:07         ` Andrew Morton
2025-05-13 16:26           ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-05-13 19:16             ` Andrew Morton
2025-05-13 19:33               ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-05-14  7:34               ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-14 22:42                 ` Andrew Morton
2025-05-15  3:19                 ` Tianyang Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=025e3f51-2ab5-bc58-5475-b57103169a82@loongson.cn \
    --to=zhangtianyang@loongson.cn \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
    --cc=jackmanb@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox