From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9BF0C433EF for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 13:08:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 5CB2D6B0072; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 09:08:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 57AC86B0073; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 09:08:19 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 3F3BD6B0074; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 09:08:19 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (relay.hostedemail.com [64.99.140.28]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B0C76B0072 for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 09:08:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin01.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E283421898 for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 13:08:18 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79272050676.01.DFB0424 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by imf30.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6537C8000C for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 13:08:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1647954498; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=orishQn+wclGjtFFgDbZmXfA/JKSYgw35GI/WKD7gX4=; b=UzOpo/pNtgK3kpAXCokeKQI4FREGgT/HEkhi/3372k9+C3fzRhJfezzTahM4ZBi6DBJ1zv zVkThattw+CKTX7QPxMJ+x7Q2NIcVAVbGwZqyGpqUhM9Gg0f9EORRUNHspBjpLcH/90IKf AcdDL/4hgkmkI0MSWzZy70cqbw0ii0I= Received: from mail-wm1-f69.google.com (mail-wm1-f69.google.com [209.85.128.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-300-3cR9EY5QNqGD3RqQjeFLFg-1; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 09:08:16 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 3cR9EY5QNqGD3RqQjeFLFg-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f69.google.com with SMTP id n19-20020a7bcbd3000000b0038c94b86258so888049wmi.2 for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 06:08:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:organization:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=orishQn+wclGjtFFgDbZmXfA/JKSYgw35GI/WKD7gX4=; b=7c4vgQe1V8RXO3Pv7jV2m8YhKvWlM4//YjBD1KokscKR4Di1HdSpLwhtbkfXZzbY6z t/1q6wqAFoXGWtCtQaHOoEZ+W1ipdWgyqEYKSALyfZUIXGnVPC4FJxDSnptIZN4XnC6N b/nkMFQDFTSILBxPw9l9dXboDicNyaIzzvf6Qye1VRp4jeHSOMGBtoGcX9Z5T6wFmLQL NUXqUGU7X9wML4ONAOCP7jG/Bh23lrPQpm5RlCbiyOQyzDRZQ7K4ppAlOaosE6svO0ta 0uUJoEw00H3vmvx+Y66zKTz4j0sf0gU7llttwlDzCOvQaFaljbkCoErss15qiBKp1oya HoLA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530LBtDyQzCodYSappYOSB0GzIT2yfmYF7T0EjKmC5AcQsAntfNs ThPFjS62dgWJtLKMxP+oiv32thcjUYhxjcp9sbbjaCMGPtOofm1cL/h73b+Ajhr9hCQ0adHCs78 mm0SF30ZvnsE= X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c40f:0:b0:389:f3ad:5166 with SMTP id k15-20020a7bc40f000000b00389f3ad5166mr3672759wmi.63.1647954495395; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 06:08:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJycVf3WpHFnTxKZZR/Qx73w8NH+ILgxlEa4QnfmD7Tq1gtTbItNDzuVWuN5GFtXq/sjR1/www== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c40f:0:b0:389:f3ad:5166 with SMTP id k15-20020a7bc40f000000b00389f3ad5166mr3672723wmi.63.1647954495014; Tue, 22 Mar 2022 06:08:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2003:cb:c708:de00:549e:e4e4:98df:ff72? (p200300cbc708de00549ee4e498dfff72.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:cb:c708:de00:549e:e4e4:98df:ff72]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d20-20020a05600c34d400b0038caf684679sm2800030wmq.0.2022.03.22.06.08.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 22 Mar 2022 06:08:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <019a2159-57d6-c330-53c5-38458b6b5ec9@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 14:08:13 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.2 Subject: Re: [RFC 2/3] mm: export zap_page_range() To: Xiaoguang Wang , linux-mm@kvack.org, target-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, xuyu@linux.alibaba.com, bostroesser@gmail.com References: <20220318095531.15479-1-xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com> <20220318095531.15479-3-xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com> <37d6b269-dd9d-dbd1-74b1-4191cc3d4bf9@linux.alibaba.com> From: David Hildenbrand Organization: Red Hat In-Reply-To: <37d6b269-dd9d-dbd1-74b1-4191cc3d4bf9@linux.alibaba.com> X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspam-User: Authentication-Results: imf30.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b="UzOpo/pN"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=none (imf30.hostedemail.com: domain of david@redhat.com has no SPF policy when checking 170.10.133.124) smtp.mailfrom=david@redhat.com X-Rspamd-Server: rspam08 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 6537C8000C X-Stat-Signature: c5naunfr7exgg4yhm8ah69ffwaaketwp X-HE-Tag: 1647954498-526300 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000007, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 22.03.22 14:02, Xiaoguang Wang wrote: > hi, > >> On 18.03.22 10:55, Xiaoguang Wang wrote: >>> Module target_core_user will use it to implement zero copy feature. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Xiaoguang Wang >>> --- >>> mm/memory.c | 1 + >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c >>> index 1f745e4d11c2..9974d0406dad 100644 >>> --- a/mm/memory.c >>> +++ b/mm/memory.c >>> @@ -1664,6 +1664,7 @@ void zap_page_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start, >>> mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(&range); >>> tlb_finish_mmu(&tlb); >>> } >>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(zap_page_range); >>> >>> /** >>> * zap_page_range_single - remove user pages in a given range >> To which VMAs will you be applying zap_page_range? I assume only to some >> special ones where you previously vm_insert_page(s)_mkspecial'ed pages, >> not to some otherwise random VMAs, correct? > Yes, you're right :) I'd suggest exposing a dedicated function that performs sanity checks on the vma (VM_PFNMAP ?) and only zaps within a single VMA. Essentially zap_page_range_single(), excluding "struct zap_details *details" and including sanity checks. Reason is that we don't want anybody to blindly zap_page_range() within random VMAs from a kernel module. -- Thanks, David / dhildenb