From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <018401c1a57a$e8102590$3c00a8c0@baazee.com> Reply-To: "Anish Srivastava" From: "Anish Srivastava" References: <008301c1a4c1$a79f8fa0$3c00a8c0@baazee.com> <3C5076C1.DDEE200B@zip.com.au> Subject: Re: kernel 2.4.17 with -rmap VM patch ROCKS!!! Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 14:02:58 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrea Arcangeli , Rik van Riel , alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk List-ID: > The fact that the current stable version of the Linux kernel > can only achieve an eight-hour uptime on this class of machine > is a fairly serious problem, don't we all agree? > > We need a fix for 2.4.18. > > Did you test the -aa patches? No, I havent tried the aa patches. I belive the aa patches are to be integrated in the 2.4.18 official stable release. Since I am quite happy with the performance of my machine with the rmap patch......I will leave it as it is. Though, for your information I will be checking out the aa patches on my backup machine which is also of the same class. I will let you guys know the performance with the aa patches incorporated as soon as I set it up on the other machine. Regards, Anish -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/