linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Thoughts about RTCore and RTLinux
@ 2004-03-04 16:48 Mike Ji
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Mike Ji @ 2004-03-04 16:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org', 'linux-mm@kvack.org'

Hi, folks,

I happen to read some white papers related to RTLinux. Below is some of
my personal thoughts/questions. 

* RTLinux's so called realtime extension-RTCORE  **was* to address the
previous issue--Linux is not realtime supported, for example, fully
kernel-preemptive; posix realtime extension. 

* After linux 2.6, I did not see any outstanding reason that people
still need to use a RTLinux **patch** to achieve realtime applications.
I mean, why not just linux itself? Not needed RTCORE anymore.

* From os/kernel viewpoint, it is very hard for me to position RTCORE,
but a realtime patch. I mean, RTCORE is not able to be identified into any
well-known os architecture. 

* If there is a very high performance micro-kernel, say, L4 or
QNX/Neutrino, I personally think it is much better than the RTCORE stuff,
which HAVE TO bind a secondary os as running time environment.

Some personal thoughts,
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2004-03-04 16:48 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-03-04 16:48 Thoughts about RTCore and RTLinux Mike Ji

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox