* Thoughts about RTCore and RTLinux
@ 2004-03-04 16:48 Mike Ji
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Mike Ji @ 2004-03-04 16:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org', 'linux-mm@kvack.org'
Hi, folks,
I happen to read some white papers related to RTLinux. Below is some of
my personal thoughts/questions.
* RTLinux's so called realtime extension-RTCORE **was* to address the
previous issue--Linux is not realtime supported, for example, fully
kernel-preemptive; posix realtime extension.
* After linux 2.6, I did not see any outstanding reason that people
still need to use a RTLinux **patch** to achieve realtime applications.
I mean, why not just linux itself? Not needed RTCORE anymore.
* From os/kernel viewpoint, it is very hard for me to position RTCORE,
but a realtime patch. I mean, RTCORE is not able to be identified into any
well-known os architecture.
* If there is a very high performance micro-kernel, say, L4 or
QNX/Neutrino, I personally think it is much better than the RTCORE stuff,
which HAVE TO bind a secondary os as running time environment.
Some personal thoughts,
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2004-03-04 16:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-03-04 16:48 Thoughts about RTCore and RTLinux Mike Ji
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox