linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, hughd@google.com
Cc: willy@infradead.org, ziy@nvidia.com, ljs@kernel.org,
	lance.yang@linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm: shmem: always support large folios for internal shmem mount
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2026 17:27:44 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <015de194-99b9-4f9e-8c89-d35807c6fd08@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1b3c0401-6d10-4a28-97c8-8e3858d8dc3d@kernel.org>



On 4/17/26 5:21 PM, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
> On 4/17/26 05:25, Baolin Wang wrote:
>> Currently, when shmem mounts are initialized, they only use 'sbinfo->huge' to
>> determine whether the shmem mount supports large folios. However, for anonymous
>> shmem, whether it supports large folios can be dynamically configured via sysfs
>> interfaces, so setting or not setting mapping_set_large_folios() during initialization
>> cannot accurately reflect whether anonymous shmem actually supports large folios,
>> which has already caused some confusion[1].
>>
>> As discussed with David[2], for anonymous shmem we can treat it as always potentially
>> having large folios. Therefore, always support large folios for the internal shmem
>> mount (e.g., anonymous shmem), and which large order allocations are allowed can be
>> configured dynamically via the 'shmem_enabled' interfaces.
>>
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/ec927492-4577-4192-8fad-85eb1bb43121@linux.alibaba.com/
>> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/875dc63b-0cd2-49e5-8b0d-3fb062789813@kernel.org/
>> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
>> ---
>> Changes from v2:
>>   - Always support large folios for internal shmem mount, per David.
>> Changes from v1:
>>   - Update the comments and commit message, per Lance.
>> ---
>>   mm/shmem.c | 13 +++++++++++--
>>   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
>> index 4ecefe02881d..769ef37b1ea9 100644
>> --- a/mm/shmem.c
>> +++ b/mm/shmem.c
>> @@ -3088,8 +3088,17 @@ static struct inode *__shmem_get_inode(struct mnt_idmap *idmap,
>>   	if (sbinfo->noswap)
>>   		mapping_set_unevictable(inode->i_mapping);
>>   
>> -	/* Don't consider 'deny' for emergencies and 'force' for testing */
>> -	if (sbinfo->huge)
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Always support large folios for the internal shmem mount (e.g.,
>> +	 * anonymous shmem), and which large order allocations are allowed
>> +	 * can be configured dynamically via the 'shmem_enabled' interfaces.
>> +	 *
>> +	 * For tmpfs, honour the 'huge=' mount option to determine whether
>> +	 * large folios are supported.
>> +	 *
>> +	 * Note: don't consider 'deny' for emergencies and 'force' for testing.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (sbinfo->huge || (sb->s_flags & SB_KERNMOUNT))
>>   		mapping_set_large_folios(inode->i_mapping);
> 
> Two questions from a non-fs person about the semantics here:
> 
> a) Can sbinfo->huge be triggered later, for example, through a remount
> (staring at shmem_reconfigure())

For tmpfs, yes.

> b) Do we cover all cases with the SB_KERNMOUNT where sbinfo->huge cannot
> be changed later?

For mounts with the SB_KERNMOUNT flag set, which is essentially the 
internal shmem mount, as we discussed, we don't care about sbinfo->huge. 
Because for the internal shmem mount, we always consider it as 
potentially having large folios.


  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-17  9:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-17  3:25 Baolin Wang
2026-04-17  9:21 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-17  9:27   ` Baolin Wang [this message]
2026-04-17  9:52     ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=015de194-99b9-4f9e-8c89-d35807c6fd08@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox