From: "Sooyong Suk" <s.suk@samsung.com>
To: "'Suren Baghdasaryan'" <surenb@google.com>
Cc: "'Jaewon Kim'" <jaewon31.kim@gmail.com>,
"'Christoph Hellwig'" <hch@infradead.org>,
<viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
<spssyr@gmail.com>, <axboe@kernel.dk>,
<linux-block@vger.kernel.org>, <dhavale@google.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH] block, fs: use FOLL_LONGTERM as gup_flags for direct IO
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 15:38:37 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <014b01db8f2b$8ed1c740$ac7555c0$@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJuCfpHjV=nRmkAGrf-tyCxEEygZ0CuW-PRp+F_vHwFbfYS8dA@mail.gmail.com>
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2025 at 6:07 PM Sooyong Suk <s.suk@samsung.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Mar 7, 2025 at 12:26 AM Christoph Hellwig
> > > <hch@infradead.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 04:40:56PM +0900, Sooyong Suk wrote:
> > > > > There are GUP references to pages that are serving as direct IO
> > > buffers.
> > > > > Those pages can be allocated from CMA pageblocks despite they
> > > > > can be pinned until the DIO is completed.
> > > >
> > > > direct I/O is eactly the case that is not FOLL_LONGTERM and one of
> > > > the reasons to even have the flag. So big fat no to this.
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > Understood.
> >
> > > Hello, thank you for your comment.
> > > We, Sooyong and I, wanted to get some opinions about this
> > > FOLL_LONGTERM for direct I/O as CMA memory got pinned pages which
> > > had been pinned from direct io.
> > >
> > > > You also completely failed to address the relevant mailinglist and
> > > > maintainers.
> > >
> > > I added block maintainer Jens Axboe and the block layer maillinst
> > > here, and added Suren and Sandeep, too.
>
> I'm very far from being a block layer expert :)
>
> >
> > Then, what do you think of using PF_MEMALLOC_PIN for this context as
> below?
> > This will only remove __GFP_MOVABLE from its allocation flag.
> > Since __bio_iov_iter_get_pages() indicates that it will pin user or
> > kernel pages, there seems to be no reason not to use this process flag.
>
> I think this will help you only when the pages are faulted in but if
> __get_user_pages() finds an already mapped page which happens to be
> allocated from CMA, it will not migrate it. So, you might still end up
> with unmovable pages inside CMA.
>
Yes, you're right.
However, we can at least prevent issues from fault-in cases and mitigate
the overall probability of CMA allocation failure. And the pinned pages that
we observed from snapuserd was also allocated by fault-in.
> >
> > block/bio.c | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c index 65c796ecb..671e28966
> > 100644
> > --- a/block/bio.c
> > +++ b/block/bio.c
> > @@ -1248,6 +1248,7 @@ static int __bio_iov_iter_get_pages(struct bio
> *bio, struct iov_iter *iter)
> > unsigned len, i = 0;
> > size_t offset;
> > int ret = 0;
> > + unsigned int flags;
> >
> > /*
> > * Move page array up in the allocated memory for the bio vecs
> > as far as @@ -1267,9 +1268,11 @@ static int
> __bio_iov_iter_get_pages(struct bio *bio, struct iov_iter *iter)
> > * result to ensure the bio's total size is correct. The remainder
> of
> > * the iov data will be picked up in the next bio iteration.
> > */
> > + flags = memalloc_pin_save();
> > size = iov_iter_extract_pages(iter, &pages,
> > UINT_MAX - bio->bi_iter.bi_size,
> > nr_pages, extraction_flags,
> > &offset);
> > + memalloc_pin_restore(flags);
> > if (unlikely(size <= 0))
> > return size ? size : -EFAULT;
> >
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-07 6:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20250306074101epcas1p4b24ac546f93df2c7fe3176607b20e47f@epcas1p4.samsung.com>
2025-03-06 7:40 ` Sooyong Suk
2025-03-06 15:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-06 23:28 ` Jaewon Kim
2025-03-07 2:07 ` Sooyong Suk
2025-03-07 2:28 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-03-07 6:38 ` Sooyong Suk [this message]
2025-03-12 15:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-12 15:20 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-03-12 15:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-12 15:38 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-03-12 15:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-12 16:03 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-12 16:06 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-03-12 16:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-07 20:23 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-03-07 21:37 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-03-12 15:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-13 22:49 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-03-15 1:04 ` John Hubbard
2025-03-15 23:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-03-15 23:09 ` Zi Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='014b01db8f2b$8ed1c740$ac7555c0$@samsung.com' \
--to=s.suk@samsung.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dhavale@google.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jaewon31.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=spssyr@gmail.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox