From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
To: 'Hiroshi Doyu' <hdoyu@nvidia.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kyungmin.park@samsung.com,
arnd@arndb.de, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, chunsang.jeong@linaro.org,
vdumpa@nvidia.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com, subashrp@gmail.com,
minchan@kernel.org, pullip.cho@samsung.com
Subject: RE: [v2 4/4] ARM: dma-mapping: IOMMU allocates pages from atomic_pool with GFP_ATOMIC
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:33:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <013c01cd8101$8ccfa020$a66ee060$%szyprowski@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1345702229-9539-5-git-send-email-hdoyu@nvidia.com>
Hi Hiroshi,
On Thursday, August 23, 2012 8:10 AM Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> Makes use of the same atomic pool from DMA, and skips kernel page
> mapping which can involve sleep'able operations at allocating a kernel
> page table.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@nvidia.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> index 7ab016b..433312a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> @@ -1063,7 +1063,6 @@ static struct page **__iommu_alloc_buffer(struct device *dev, size_t
> size,
> struct page **pages;
> int count = size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> int array_size = count * sizeof(struct page *);
> - int err;
>
> if ((array_size <= PAGE_SIZE) || (gfp & GFP_ATOMIC))
> pages = kzalloc(array_size, gfp);
> @@ -1072,9 +1071,20 @@ static struct page **__iommu_alloc_buffer(struct device *dev, size_t
> size,
> if (!pages)
> return NULL;
>
> - err = __alloc_fill_pages(&pages, count, gfp);
> - if (err)
> - goto error
> + if (gfp & GFP_ATOMIC) {
> + struct page *page;
> + int i;
> + void *addr = __alloc_from_pool(size, &page);
> + if (!addr)
> + goto error;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < count; i++)
> + pages[i] = page + i;
> + } else {
> + int err = __alloc_fill_pages(&pages, count, gfp);
> + if (err)
> + goto error;
> + }
>
> return pages;
>
> @@ -1091,9 +1101,15 @@ static int __iommu_free_buffer(struct device *dev, struct page **pages,
> size_t s
> int count = size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> int array_size = count * sizeof(struct page *);
> int i;
> +
> + if (__free_from_pool(page_address(pages[0]), size))
> + goto out;
> +
> for (i = 0; i < count; i++)
> if (pages[i])
> __free_pages(pages[i], 0);
> +
> +out:
> if ((array_size <= PAGE_SIZE) ||
> __in_atomic_pool(page_address(pages[0]), size))
> kfree(pages);
> @@ -1221,6 +1237,9 @@ static void *arm_iommu_alloc_attrs(struct device *dev, size_t size,
> if (*handle == DMA_ERROR_CODE)
> goto err_buffer;
>
> + if (gfp & GFP_ATOMIC)
> + return page_address(pages[0]);
> +
> if (dma_get_attr(DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING, attrs))
> return pages;
>
I've read the whole code and it looks that it starts to become a little spaghetti - there are too
many places altered by those atomic changes and it is hard to follow the logic at the first sight.
IMHO it will be better to add a following function:
static void *__iommu_alloc_atomic(struct device *dev, size_t size,
dma_addr_t *handle)
{
struct page *page, **pages;
int count = size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
int array_size = count * sizeof(struct page *);
void *addr;
int i;
pages = kzalloc(array_size, gfp);
if (!pages)
return NULL;
addr = __alloc_from_pool(size, &page);
if (!addr)
goto err_pool;
for (i = 0; i < count; i++)
pages[i] = page + i;
*handle = __iommu_create_mapping(dev, pages, size);
if (*handle == DMA_ERROR_CODE)
goto err_mapping;
return addr;
err_mapping:
__free_from_pool(addr, size);
err_pool:
kfree(pages);
return NULL;
}
and then call it at the beginning of the arm_iommu_alloc_attrs():
if (gfp & GFP_ATOMIC)
return __iommu_alloc_atomic(dev, size, handle);
You should also add support for the allocation from atomic_pool to __iommu_get_pages() function
to get dma_mmap() and dma_get_sgtable() working correctly.
> @@ -1279,7 +1298,8 @@ void arm_iommu_free_attrs(struct device *dev, size_t size, void
> *cpu_addr,
> return;
> }
>
> - if (!dma_get_attr(DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING, attrs)) {
> + if (!dma_get_attr(DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING, attrs) ||
> + !__in_atomic_pool(cpu_addr, size)) {
> unmap_kernel_range((unsigned long)cpu_addr, size);
> vunmap(cpu_addr);
> }
Are you sure this one works? __iommu_get_pages() won't find pages array, because atomic
allocations don't get their separate vm_struct area, so this check will be never reached. Maybe
a __iommu_free_atomic() function would also make it safer and easier to understand.
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski
Samsung Poland R&D Center
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-23 7:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-23 6:10 [v2 0/4] ARM: dma-mapping: IOMMU atomic allocation Hiroshi Doyu
2012-08-23 6:10 ` [v2 1/4] ARM: dma-mapping: Refactor out to introduce __in_atomic_pool Hiroshi Doyu
2012-08-23 6:10 ` [v2 2/4] ARM: dma-mapping: Use kzalloc() with GFP_ATOMIC Hiroshi Doyu
2012-08-23 6:10 ` [v2 3/4] ARM: dma-mapping: Refactor out to introduce __alloc_fill_pages Hiroshi Doyu
2012-08-23 6:10 ` [v2 4/4] ARM: dma-mapping: IOMMU allocates pages from atomic_pool with GFP_ATOMIC Hiroshi Doyu
2012-08-23 7:33 ` Marek Szyprowski [this message]
2012-08-23 6:43 ` [v2 0/4] ARM: dma-mapping: IOMMU atomic allocation Minchan Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='013c01cd8101$8ccfa020$a66ee060$%szyprowski@samsung.com' \
--to=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=chunsang.jeong@linaro.org \
--cc=hdoyu@nvidia.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=pullip.cho@samsung.com \
--cc=subashrp@gmail.com \
--cc=vdumpa@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox