linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* mmap002 execution time doubled... good or bad sign?
@ 2001-02-10 22:23 Roger Larsson
  2001-02-11  2:05 ` Marcelo Tosatti
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Roger Larsson @ 2001-02-10 22:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-mm

Hi,

I have been running various stress tests on disk for some time.
streaming write, copy, read, diff, dbench and mmap002

This is what I have seen:

>From 2.4.0 to 2.4.1 with Marcelos patch write were above 10 MB/s
and read >13 MB/s, dbench > 10 MB/s, mmap took around 2m30.

After 2.4.1-pre8 (did not test anything in between)
Write is at 9-10 [lost 1 MB/s] read is down to 11-12 MB/s [lost 2 MB/s]
dbench > 9 MB/s [one MB/s there too]

But the really strange one - mmap002 now takes > 4m30
Is this expected / good behaviour? mmap002 abuses mmaps...

/RogerL

-- 
Home page:
  none currently
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: mmap002 execution time doubled... good or bad sign?
  2001-02-10 22:23 mmap002 execution time doubled... good or bad sign? Roger Larsson
@ 2001-02-11  2:05 ` Marcelo Tosatti
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Marcelo Tosatti @ 2001-02-11  2:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Roger Larsson; +Cc: linux-mm


On Sat, 10 Feb 2001, Roger Larsson wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I have been running various stress tests on disk for some time.
> streaming write, copy, read, diff, dbench and mmap002
> 
> This is what I have seen:
> 
> >From 2.4.0 to 2.4.1 with Marcelos patch write were above 10 MB/s
> and read >13 MB/s, dbench > 10 MB/s, mmap took around 2m30.
> 
> After 2.4.1-pre8 (did not test anything in between)
> Write is at 9-10 [lost 1 MB/s] read is down to 11-12 MB/s [lost 2 MB/s]
> dbench > 9 MB/s [one MB/s there too]
> 
> But the really strange one - mmap002 now takes > 4m30
> Is this expected / good behaviour? mmap002 abuses mmaps...

These are probably Jens modifications to the block queuing mechanisms
since there were no VM changes from 2.4.1-pre8 to now in Linus tree.

Its not necessarily a bad thing, since Jens modifications make processes
throttle on IO sooner. 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2001-02-11  2:05 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-02-10 22:23 mmap002 execution time doubled... good or bad sign? Roger Larsson
2001-02-11  2:05 ` Marcelo Tosatti

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox