linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: "Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slub: track number of slabs irrespective of CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 01:15:30 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <010001641fe92599-9006a895-d1ea-4881-a63c-f3749ff9b7b3-000000@email.amazonses.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180620224147.23777-1-shakeelb@google.com>

On Wed, 20 Jun 2018, Shakeel Butt wrote:

> For !CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG, SLUB does not maintain the number of slabs
> allocated per node for a kmem_cache. Thus, slabs_node() in
> __kmem_cache_empty(), __kmem_cache_shrink() and __kmem_cache_destroy()
> will always return 0 for such config. This is wrong and can cause issues
> for all users of these functions.


CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG is set by default on almost all builds. The only case
where CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG is switched off is when we absolutely need to use
the minimum amount of memory (embedded or some such thing).

> The right solution is to make slabs_node() work even for
> !CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG. The commit 0f389ec63077 ("slub: No need for per node
> slab counters if !SLUB_DEBUG") had put the per node slab counter under
> CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG because it was only read through sysfs API and the
> sysfs API was disabled on !CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG. However the users of the
> per node slab counter assumed that it will work in the absence of
> CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG. So, make the counter work for !CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG.

Please do not do this. Find a way to avoid these checks. The
objective of a !CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG configuration is to not compile in
debuggin checks etc etc in order to reduce the code/data footprint to the
minimum necessary while sacrificing debuggability etc etc.

Maybe make it impossible to disable CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG if CGROUPs are in
use?

  reply	other threads:[~2018-06-21  1:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-20 22:41 Shakeel Butt
2018-06-21  1:15 ` Christopher Lameter [this message]
2018-06-21  6:30   ` Shakeel Butt
2018-06-21 15:01   ` Michal Hocko
2018-06-22 15:33     ` Shakeel Butt
2018-06-22 15:46       ` [PATCH] kasan: depend on CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-06-22 15:58         ` Michal Hocko
2018-06-22 16:10         ` Shakeel Butt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=010001641fe92599-9006a895-d1ea-4881-a63c-f3749ff9b7b3-000000@email.amazonses.com \
    --to=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox