From: Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: "Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slub: track number of slabs irrespective of CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 01:15:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <010001641fe92599-9006a895-d1ea-4881-a63c-f3749ff9b7b3-000000@email.amazonses.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180620224147.23777-1-shakeelb@google.com>
On Wed, 20 Jun 2018, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> For !CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG, SLUB does not maintain the number of slabs
> allocated per node for a kmem_cache. Thus, slabs_node() in
> __kmem_cache_empty(), __kmem_cache_shrink() and __kmem_cache_destroy()
> will always return 0 for such config. This is wrong and can cause issues
> for all users of these functions.
CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG is set by default on almost all builds. The only case
where CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG is switched off is when we absolutely need to use
the minimum amount of memory (embedded or some such thing).
> The right solution is to make slabs_node() work even for
> !CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG. The commit 0f389ec63077 ("slub: No need for per node
> slab counters if !SLUB_DEBUG") had put the per node slab counter under
> CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG because it was only read through sysfs API and the
> sysfs API was disabled on !CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG. However the users of the
> per node slab counter assumed that it will work in the absence of
> CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG. So, make the counter work for !CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG.
Please do not do this. Find a way to avoid these checks. The
objective of a !CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG configuration is to not compile in
debuggin checks etc etc in order to reduce the code/data footprint to the
minimum necessary while sacrificing debuggability etc etc.
Maybe make it impossible to disable CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG if CGROUPs are in
use?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-21 1:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-20 22:41 Shakeel Butt
2018-06-21 1:15 ` Christopher Lameter [this message]
2018-06-21 6:30 ` Shakeel Butt
2018-06-21 15:01 ` Michal Hocko
2018-06-22 15:33 ` Shakeel Butt
2018-06-22 15:46 ` [PATCH] kasan: depend on CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-06-22 15:58 ` Michal Hocko
2018-06-22 16:10 ` Shakeel Butt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=010001641fe92599-9006a895-d1ea-4881-a63c-f3749ff9b7b3-000000@email.amazonses.com \
--to=cl@linux.com \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox