From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
<akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <hughd@google.com>
Cc: <willy@infradead.org>, <david@redhat.com>, <21cnbao@gmail.com>,
<ryan.roberts@arm.com>, <ioworker0@gmail.com>,
<da.gomez@samsung.com>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/4] Support large folios for tmpfs
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 15:49:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <007880ac-d73f-4eef-9978-a4f844338522@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1728548374.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
On 2024/10/10 17:58, Baolin Wang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This RFC patch series attempts to support large folios for tmpfs.
>
> Considering that tmpfs already has the 'huge=' option to control the THP
> allocation, it is necessary to maintain compatibility with the 'huge='
> option, as well as considering the 'deny' and 'force' option controlled
> by '/sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/shmem_enabled'.
>
> Add a new huge option 'write_size' to support large folio allocation based
> on the write size for tmpfs write and fallocate paths. So the huge pages
> allocation strategy for tmpfs is that, if the 'huge=' option
> (huge=always/within_size/advise) is enabled or the 'shmem_enabled' option
> is 'force', it need just allow PMD sized THP to keep backward compatibility
> for tmpfs. While 'huge=' option is disabled (huge=never) or the 'shmem_enabled'
> option is 'deny', it will still disable any large folio allocations. Only
> when the 'huge=' option is 'write_size', it will allow allocating large
> folios based on the write size.
>
> And I think the 'huge=write_size' option should be the default behavior
> for tmpfs in future.
Could we avoid new huge= option for tmpfs, maybe support other orders
for both read/write/fallocate if mount with huge?
>
> Any comments and suggestions are appreciated. Thanks.
>
> Changes from RFC v2:
> - Drop mTHP interfaces to control huge page allocation, per Matthew.
> - Add a new helper to calculate the order, suggested by Matthew.
> - Add a new huge=write_size option to allocate large folios based on
> the write size.
> - Add a new patch to update the documentation.
>
> Changes from RFC v1:
> - Drop patch 1.
> - Use 'write_end' to calculate the length in shmem_allowable_huge_orders().
> - Update shmem_mapping_size_order() per Daniel.
>
> Baolin Wang (4):
> mm: factor out the order calculation into a new helper
> mm: shmem: change shmem_huge_global_enabled() to return huge order
> bitmap
> mm: shmem: add large folio support to the write and fallocate paths
> for tmpfs
> docs: tmpfs: add documention for 'write_size' huge option
>
> Documentation/filesystems/tmpfs.rst | 7 +-
> include/linux/pagemap.h | 16 ++++-
> mm/shmem.c | 105 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 3 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-16 7:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-10 9:58 Baolin Wang
2024-10-10 9:58 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/4] mm: factor out the order calculation into a new helper Baolin Wang
2024-10-10 9:58 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/4] mm: shmem: change shmem_huge_global_enabled() to return huge order bitmap Baolin Wang
2024-10-10 9:58 ` [RFC PATCH v3 3/4] mm: shmem: add large folio support to the write and fallocate paths for tmpfs Baolin Wang
2024-10-10 9:58 ` [RFC PATCH v3 4/4] docs: tmpfs: add documention for 'write_size' huge option Baolin Wang
2024-10-16 7:49 ` Kefeng Wang [this message]
2024-10-16 9:29 ` [RFC PATCH v3 0/4] Support large folios for tmpfs Baolin Wang
2024-10-16 13:45 ` Kefeng Wang
2024-10-17 9:52 ` Baolin Wang
2024-10-16 14:06 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-10-17 9:34 ` Baolin Wang
2024-10-17 11:26 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2024-10-21 6:24 ` Baolin Wang
2024-10-21 8:54 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2024-10-21 13:34 ` Daniel Gomez
2024-10-22 3:41 ` Baolin Wang
2024-10-22 15:31 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-23 8:04 ` Baolin Wang
2024-10-23 9:27 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-24 10:49 ` Daniel Gomez
2024-10-24 10:52 ` Daniel Gomez
2024-10-25 2:56 ` Baolin Wang
2024-10-25 20:21 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-28 9:48 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-31 3:43 ` Baolin Wang
2024-10-31 8:53 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-31 10:04 ` Baolin Wang
2024-10-31 10:46 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-05 12:45 ` Baolin Wang
2024-11-05 14:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-11-06 3:17 ` Baolin Wang
2024-10-31 10:46 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-28 21:56 ` Daniel Gomez
2024-10-29 12:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-22 3:34 ` Baolin Wang
2024-10-22 10:06 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2024-10-23 9:25 ` Baolin Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=007880ac-d73f-4eef-9978-a4f844338522@huawei.com \
--to=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=da.gomez@samsung.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox